"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A good analysis of were C# fits re Java and C++ is at
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/09/1612254&mode=thread
Wherein we read:
> One new feature that I mentioned already was that of copy-by-value
> objects. This seemingly s
On 09-Aug-2000, Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hopefully that won't be the case. However, I feel uncomfortable with
> the whole .NET/C# situation. Like clockwork, MS releases yet another
> new product that they claim will change the world. Meanwhile, there is
> no C# implementati
Theodore Norvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I've been following this discussion, but there are so many new buzzwords
> coming out of microsoft that it's a bit confusing for those not
> in the know.
That's part of the masterplan ;-)
> Is there a quick way to summarize the relationships
> bet
Norman Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody know of work using monads to encapsulate a source of
> random numbers? A quick web search suggested Haskell 98 did not take
> this path. I'd be curious for any insights why, or any suggestions
> about a `randomness monad'.
My guess as t
> > Does anybody know of work using monads to encapsulate a source of
> > random numbers?
> Is the global random number generator, in section 17.3 of the Haskell
> 98 library report, the sort of thing you're after?
No; that appears to embed a generator in the IO monad.
Not what I'd hope
Norman Ramsey writes:
> Does anybody know of work using monads to encapsulate a source of
> random numbers? A quick web search suggested Haskell 98 did not take
> this path. I'd be curious for any insights why, or any suggestions
> about a `randomness monad'.
>
>
> Norman
Hi.
Is the
Does anybody know of work using monads to encapsulate a source of
random numbers? A quick web search suggested Haskell 98 did not take
this path. I'd be curious for any insights why, or any suggestions
about a `randomness monad'.
Norman
> So if all of you could get your weight together and publish an
> experts' report on how the platform could be improved so that
> your efforts could add value for its customers, that might have
> quite some influence if you do it early enough (ask the Pizza
> shop what it
"Craig Dickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Leaving just a few random quotes, snipping lots of good and accurate
technical-historical stuff]
> Nigel Perry wrote:
>
> > > NGWS
> >
> > An older temporary name for .NET. NGWS? Never Goes Wonderfully Sucks?
> > I think somebody shot the marketing
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 20:27:14 +0100, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> In the language I had in mind, I would expect to be able to "retrieve" the
> () from any product, at any position
I still prefer the list-like non-associative treatment of tuples.
It needs not type system extensions.
The
[discussion of benefits and otherwise of .NET, C#, ..]
They have definitely managed to attract some attention, haven't they?-)
If we put language and other wars aside for the moment, there are a few
questions that haven't come up yet, the answers to which would interest
me (and seem relevant for
[a while ago]
From: Tom Pledger
> Claus Reinke writes:
> > - one would think that () simply takes its role as a unit, so that
> > (),a == a == a,()
> > but if we know x::() does that imply that x,a == a ?
> > x could be bottom, and the equations for the unit look strict in
> > their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) writes:
> Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:17:15 +0200, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> > Haskell#
> This is what worries me: modifying a bunch of languages to make them
> incompatible with the rest of the world
How did they say on segfault.org:
Micros
Nigel Perry wrote:
> > NGWS
>
> An older temporary name for .NET. NGWS? Never Goes Wonderfully Sucks?
> I think somebody shot the marketing guy and replaced him, she then
> came up with ".NET" :-)
Next Generation Windows Services (I think), as opposed to older generations
such as the Win32 APIs
At 11:01 am -0230 9/8/00, Theodore Norvell wrote:
>I've been following this discussion, but there are so many new buzzwords
>coming out of microsoft that it's a bit confusing for those not
>in the know. Is there a quick way to summarize the relationships
>between
> .NET
The name for a whol
I've been following this discussion, but there are so many new buzzwords
coming out of microsoft that it's a bit confusing for those not
in the know. Is there a quick way to summarize the relationships
between
.NET
NGWS
C# (which I've discovered is intended to be pronounc
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000 16:53:42 -0400 you wrote:
> Armin,
>
> Is HDoc also designed to work with the February 2000 version of Hugs98?
>
> Will it work under Linux and MacOS as well as under Win 32 (including Windows 2000)?
>
> --Benjamin L. Russell
HDoc should run on any version of Hugs98 as it
At 4:09 pm + 8/8/00, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
>Tue, 8 Aug 2000 09:17:15 +0200, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
>> You hit the nail right on the head wrt to Haskell and .NET. This is
>> precisely why I am working on Mondrian, which also goes under the name
>> Haskell#, a pur
18 matches
Mail list logo
