Adrian Hey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
My objection to the use of GC (and by implication all current Haskell
implementations) in embedded systems would be that if your program is
sufficiently complex/powerful that it can't be implemented as some kind
of _finite_ state machine, then it can never
On 10-Aug-2000, Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can download it here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/#sdk
There is a C# compiler and runtime environment in the SDK.
Thanks for the link! Unfortunately, its click-through
license forbids disassembly, reverse
Byron Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
At 05:21 AM 8/11/2000 +0100, you wrote:
On Fri 11 Aug, Byron Hale wrote:
Also, garbage collection is unlikely to satisfy any need
for automatic memory management in real-time systems for the foreseeable
future because an extra thread on a single
On 11-Aug-2000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ketil Malde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A good analysis of were C# fits re Java and C++ is at
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/09/1612254mode=thread
On 02-Aug-2000, Doug Ransom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The PDC slides and white papers should be available if you dig
through this site:
http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/default.asp
In particular http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp.
However, as seems to be usual (%*^#*^#@!) for
| -Original Message-
| From: Jan Skibinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 3:11 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: doubles
|
|
|
|
| Aha . And how many digits will GHC offer me?
|
| I would think that you will get
At 4:59 pm -0230 10/8/00, Theodore Norvell wrote:
With Haskell# or Mondrian: Can I use C# to create an instance of
a Haskell class? Can I use Haskell to extend a C# abstract class?
I suspect the answer to both these questions is currently no.
If future versions of .NET and Haskell variants change
-Original Message-
From: Fergus Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:18 AM
...
In particular http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp.
However, as seems to be usual (%*^#*^#@!) for MS, this page is NOT
written in portable HTML. Certainly
Antony Courtney wrote:
But Java also has a way to do "rampant pointer-level
optimization": You declare a method as "native" and
then implement it in C.
That's hardly the same thing, though. Of course an FFI allows you do to all
sorts of things, but at least it's very clear, from the fact
On Fri 11 Aug, Byron Hale wrote:
Also, garbage collection is unlikely to satisfy any need
for automatic memory management in real-time systems for the foreseeable
future because an extra thread on a single processor is still
non-deterministic.
I don't buy this: for a long time the
On 11-Aug-2000, R.S. Nikhil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fergus Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:18 AM
...
In particular http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp.
However, as seems to be usual (%*^#*^#@!) for
Sengan wrote:
I don't buy this: for a long time the embedded hard realtime people
refused to use CPUs with cache because they would be
"non-deterministic".
They finally gave up, realizing that CPU's with caches are much faster.
If garbage collection is relatively cheap and makes it 10x
George Russell wrote:
(Is there anything better than Baker's train algorithm?)
Sorry, I meant "treadmill" not "train". The train algorithm is an almost-bounded
garbage collection algorithm. (However it fails to be
properly bounded if you have large numbers of in-pointers to a node.)
Replying to Fergus Henderson's complaints about non-portable HMTL in the web
document at http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp, R. S. Nikhil
writes:
And is Netscape Communicator 4.61 on Linux (bugs and all) a definitive
test of portable HTML? :-)
No. A definitive test
I wrote:
... http://validator.w3.com/ ...
which should be http://validator.w3.org/. Sorry about that ...
--
John David Stone - Lecturer in Computer Science and Philosophy
Manager of the Mathematics Local-Area Network
Grinnell College - Grinnell, Iowa 50112 -
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, R.S. Nikhil wrote:
And is Netscape Communicator 4.61 on Linux (bugs and all) a definitive
test of portable HTML? :-)
Actually it seems to be quite readable by lynx...
-Sylvan
--
Do, or do not. There's no try. -Yoda
Sylvan Ravinet: http://www.ravinet.com/sylvan/contact
Sylvan Ravinet wrote:
Do, or do not. There's no try. -Yoda
Pedantic not to be, but in contractions speak, does Yoda not. Is quote, "Do,
or do not. There is no 'try'."
Craig
No. A definitive test is to submit the page to the validator at the World
Wide Web Consortium's web site (http://validator.w3.com/), which (not
surprisingly) finds 455 HTML errors, beginning with the absence of a document
type declaration.
I bet you that 99% web pages on
On 11-Aug-2000, Sylvan Ravinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, R.S. Nikhil wrote:
And is Netscape Communicator 4.61 on Linux (bugs and all) a definitive
test of portable HTML? :-)
Actually it seems to be quite readable by lynx...
Yes -- that's the worst part. In Lynx and
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:06:55 -0500
John David Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replying to Fergus Henderson's complaints about
non-portable HMTL in the web
document at http://commnet.pdc.mscorpevents.com/sessions.asp,
R. S. Nikhil
writes:
And is Netscape Communicator 4.61 on Linux (bugs
20 matches
Mail list logo
