=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.4
=
A Mac OS X installer package for Mac OS 10.3 (Panther) is available at
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.4
=
A Mac OS X installer package for Mac OS 10.3 (Panther) is available at
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.4
=
A Mac OS X installer package for Mac OS 10.3 (Panther) is available at
On Friday 25 February 2005 19:14, Daan Leijen wrote:
Announcement: wxHaskell version 0.9
Could you (or anyone else) please give me a summary on how exactly I have to
patch the makefile[.lib] so that I can compile this ghc-6.4? I found the
discussion a bit confusing, because there were so many
Interesting. In that case, I would agree that portability seems like
another reason to define a Bounded instance for Double. That way users
could call 'maxBound' and 'minBound' rather than 1/0 and -(1/0)...
Frederik
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:10:33AM +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Haskell
=
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.4
=
A Mac OS X installer package for Mac OS 10.3 (Panther) is available at
And what would you have minBound and maxBound be?
I guess you could use +/- the maximum value representable.
Going for infinity is rather dodgy, and assumes an FP
representation that has infinity.
-- Lennart
Frederik Eaton wrote:
Interesting. In that case, I would agree that portability
I may be barking up the wrong tree here, but I think the key to this
discussion is that real numbers are not bounded, while doubles are
bounded. One cannot say what the smallest or largest real number are,
but one can say what the smallest or largest double are (and it is
unfortunately
I agree with all of that. :)
-- Lennart
Thomas Davie wrote:
I may be barking up the wrong tree here, but I think the key to this
discussion is that real numbers are not bounded, while doubles are
bounded. One cannot say what the smallest or largest real number are,
but one can say what
I'm wondering if there is any port of Haskell to Embedded
systems. Any hint welcomed
nhc has been used for a number of embedded projects.
As mentioned by Don Stewart, my group at Macquarie has a project to
port nhc98 to Palm OS (not quite embedded but some similar issues). An
older port
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:08:26PM +, Thomas Davie wrote:
I may be barking up the wrong tree here, but I think the key to this
discussion is that real numbers are not bounded, while doubles are
bounded. One cannot say what the smallest or largest real number are,
but one can say what
Michael Vanier wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:39:21 -0800
From: Sean Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
As an aside, I kept all of the exercises in revision control. So I can
look back at what I first wrote and my later changes. A habit I plan to
keep as I move on to other
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:01:17 -0800
From: Sean Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Michael Vanier wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:39:21 -0800
From: Sean Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
As an aside, I kept all of the exercises in revision control. So I can
look back
Jeff,
Perfect explanation.
I got gummed up in the syntactic sugar and thought that = was
sugar for the do notation, not vice versa. Thank you for the reminder and
clarification.
- Alson
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
