Hello!
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 01:52:20AM -0800, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
Yes, afraid so. However, I'm currently testing some changes I've
made to drop that DLL dependency. Included in that batch of
changes is the support for generating using DLLs too.
(prepare for ghc compiled
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 12:13:21PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
[...]
Absolutely not. It sounds like you're thinking you can call foo, have it
generate a list of unknown type but known length, and then assign a type
afterwards. You can't do that.
Yes you can, as there IS a value that
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 02:34:44PM -0800, Fritz K Ruehr wrote:
[...]
I highly recommend browsing the prelude for ideas on how to use
Haskell. A few of the definitions are written in a more subtle
fashion than you might want for this purpose (usually for generality
or or efficiency),
Hello again!
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Steve Frampton wrote:
[...]
1. Can I perform multiple statements on one line? Eg.
foo :: Int - [Char]
foo 0 = []
foo x = b = x - 5 * 3; c = b * 5; foo(x - b * c)
(The above is just a silly example...but you catch my
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:51:29PM +, P.C.Callaghan wrote:
I'm compiling the latest version (ie, cvs diff is silent).
The latter doesn't imply the first, as cvs diff (w/o any further
options) diffs between the version your checkout is based on
and your checkout itself. NOT: between
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 01:14:43AM +1100, Jason Stokes wrote:
Hi, this is kind of a novice question, but I hope it's OK to ask it here: what
precisely is the semantics of a generator? The Haskell report mentions them,
but doesn't explain their semantics.
See section 3.11,
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 06:36:57AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I propose to remove Show (IO a) as well as Show (a-b),
for the same reason
Looks good. But then, IMHO, interpreters should have special handling
for those types instead (run anything of type IO a, not only IO (),
as in
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 06:34:26AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
[...]
li Fix defn of ttrange/tt for ttInt/tt, ttInteger/tt,
ttChar/tt.
With Haskell 98 dot-dot notation, we must write:
pre
range (m,n)
| m n = [m..n]
| otherwise = []
/pre
Shouldn't
Hello!
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:38:32AM -0800, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
Felix Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try to create a fresh source tree, since it looks as if you've
got "old" sources hanging about in yours (i.e., Literal is no
more, it's Const
Hello!
Only a few comments to your mappings.
On Fri, Nov 13, 1998 at 10:02:02AM -0500, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
[...]
Java Haskell
--- ---
Class Module
Static method function
And IO tagged result,
Hello!
On Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 12:36:44AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
[...]
To quote from somewhere deep within the Prelude:
instance Show (a - b) where
showsPrec _ _ = showString "function"
[meta-comment: could we just do away with this one? Beyond giving
rise
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 01:44:58PM +0200, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Your thought would destroy equational reasoning! For example you
would be able to define different equalties on the same data
structure. So Red==Black could be False in one place and True
in another place. Does
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Ralf Comtesse wrote:
[...]
M.hs:8:19: parse error on input: "`"
You must compile the green-card / H/Direct generated sources with
-fglasgow-exts.
[...]
Regards,
Felix.
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 01:16:49PM +0400, S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
[...]
At least, i think, this will be a good idea to consider the values
like [1..] as the defined results.
It *is* defined, when you consider "you can compute the WHNF in
finite time" as defined.
The WHNF of [1..] is
Hello!
On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
[...]
The plan is to use something like
data Integer = Small Int# | Big { ... }
where '...' is the GMP representation. You then need a full set of
[...]
Sounds fine. Just a question, will there remain an Int
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 27, 1998 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Tina Yu wrote:
Hello,
I would like to include Array in Haskell 1.4 Standard Libraries
to be part of the language I define :
data Expression = Constant String
|Array Int Expression
Small mistake here: "Array" is a
Hello!
Distribution changed to glasgow-haskell-users, because that's no
additional bug.
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 07:05:59PM -0700, Shin-Cheng Mu wrote:
Thanks to all of you replied. The compilation worked, with
-monly-2-regs.
BTW, my Linux distribution is RedHat 5.1 and gcc version is
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 07:51:25PM +0800, Shin-Cheng Mu wrote:
Hello, my Hero Haskell Hackers, :)
Compiling GHC 3.02 for i386 Linux, the make process stops
at the point when compiling ghc/lib/posix/PosixProcPrim.lhs.
The error message generated is attached below.
I tried the patch
18 matches
Mail list logo
