Hi,
>> very slow. After we made the insert operation in the AVL tree
>> hyperstrict and a few similar changes, our program behaved very
>> well and is surely faster than if written in C using naive data
>> structures and algorithms. We used combinators like strict2 f x
>> y =
Jan de Wit wrote:
> I think hyperstrict means that a function completely evaluates *all*
> of its arguments before the body of the function, as opposed to only
> some of them. [...]
Hmm, at the moment I've got no cunning books around, but my
understanding of `hyperstrict' was the following: A fun
Hi All,
> I find this interesting. It would be nice if you would like to explain me
> what you mean by " hyperstrict"
>
I think hyperstrict means that a function completely evaluates *all* of its
arguments before the body of the function, as opposed to only some of
them.
A function f taki
In the vein of benchmarking,
For those of you who follow comp.arch (or am I the only one?), you
have probably noticed the discussion about Stalin vs. C compilers.
For those who don't, it's basically one particular Scheme program
where compiled Scheme beats a naïve rewrite in C with orders of
mag
Jan Brosius writes:
> Recent (really recent ) benchmarks are not available ont the
> Haskell website as far as I know
Yes, it would be nice to see some recent benchmarks and interlanguage
comparisons reported in an article. The pseudoknot article is already very
outdated, and Clean in particula
"Jan Brosius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NO, NO and NO , please read only what I have written.
You mean, apart from
>>> This seems that Haskell cannot be considered as a language for real
>>> world applications but merely as a toy for researchers .
? I could have sworn you were saying her
- Original Message -
From: Ch. A. Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: speed of compiled Haskell code.
> Hi,
>
> Jan> Haskell code optimised by strictnes annotions in functions or
> Jan> in datastructures are ? ti
- Original Message -
From: Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jan Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: speed of compiled Haskell code.
> "Jan Brosius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
