"S.D.Mechveliani" wrote:
> When processing this tree, it would be natural to write in each node
>m + b and min [m,b].
>
> The former is "necessary" due to the infix-binary tradition.
> The latter uses [,] because it is good to have one function min for a
> list an
Sun, 21 May 2000 11:53:39 +0400 (MSD), S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> The economy of names is more important.
Convenience of programming is important too. Many Prelude functions
are unnecessary, but are convenient. (++) and concat are not needed
(you can write flip (foldr (:)) for
On my proposal for minBy, gcd ... :: [a] -> a
and remark on +, && ... being the exceptions
Matt Harden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 19 May 2000
>> (+), (&&) ... are different. Because they have classical tradition
>> to be applied as binary infix o
