Hi John,
I am reading your RSA code as suggested.
1) Do you have an example code that uses your RSA API?
2) a ForeignPtr is created in function createPkey and "returned" to the
caller. I am trying to follow which function(s) GC the associated heap. ??
3) My assertion: It seems in my Posix a
Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
>> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
>> convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*. I had to
>> point out that it was a *relea
Ashley Moran wrote:
> On Aug 03, 2008, at 3:36 pm, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> I think this view is probably coloured by your background in web
>> development. I have used git for about a year now, and never visited
>> GitHub. I'm not saying you have to like git, but it does have other
>> features
Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Aug 03, 2008, at 5:36 pm, Ketil Malde wrote:
>> Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
>> which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
>> from the tarball. (Anybody with write access to the front page
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On 2008 Aug 3, at 19:16, Ben Franksen wrote:
>> The naive way to emulate your split feature would be to create a
>> branch
>> where you delete all the stuff you don't want and then maybe move the
>> subproject to a new directory (nearer the top-level). This doesn't
Hi PJ,
On 2/08/2008 4:09 AM, you wrote:
I am having issues getting hdbc/odbc working on windows.
When using GHC, I am not able to compile a simple program. It ends up
with linker errors like
[...]
Is there an easy workaround for this? Or am I doing something wrong?
MySetup
===
Windows XP S
John Goerzen wrote:
> I'm interested in writing a library to work with IMAP servers.
>
> I'm interested in thoughts people have on parsing libraries and methods.
> I'm a huge fan of Parsec overall -- it lets me have a single-stage
> parser, for instance. But it isn't sufficiently lazy for this t
On 2008 Aug 3, at 19:16, Ben Franksen wrote:
The naive way to emulate your split feature would be to create a
branch
where you delete all the stuff you don't want and then maybe move the
subproject to a new directory (nearer the top-level). This doesn't
work,
however, at least not in pract
david48 wrote:
> for each package you have to type (*) :
>
> runhaskell Setup.hs configure
> runhaskell Setup.hs build
> sudo runhaskell Setup.hs install
>
> (*) sometimes it'll be Setup.lhs, I'm annoyed that it's not always the
> same name, can't rely on shell history :(
Same here; my solution
Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "I would contribute to darcs if only..."
>>
>
> I haven't used darcs much, so it's possible that I'll be forced to start
> contributing by my own binding hypothetical.
>
> I would contribute to darcs
lutzsteens:
> Hi,
>
> I have IntMap String with about 40,000 entries. After saving it to disk
> (via Data.Binary) the file is 3.5 Mb small. However if I load it and
> save it back again my program needs 180 MB memory. Is there anything I
> do wrong or does the map really need that much memory?
Derek Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dusek wrote:
>> What about the part that reads:
>>
>> The unique arrow f making this diagram commute is then
>> correspondingly denoted f1 ∐ f2 or f1 ⊕ f2 or f1 + f2 or
>> [f1, f2]
>>
>> This would seem to say that [f,g] and f+g are the
Hi,
I have IntMap String with about 40,000 entries. After saving it to disk
(via Data.Binary) the file is 3.5 Mb small. However if I load it and
save it back again my program needs 180 MB memory. Is there anything I
do wrong or does the map really need that much memory?
The (simple) program
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:45 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> Dear Haskellers,
>
> I would like to take an informal poll for the purposes of darcs
> recruitment. Could you please complete this sentence for me?
>
>"I would contribute to darcs if only..."
>
> The answers I am most interested in hearin
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:03 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
> What about the part that reads:
>
> The unique arrow f making this diagram commute is then
> correspondingly denoted f1 ∐ f2 or f1 ⊕ f2 or f1 + f2 or
> [f1, f2]
>
> This would seem to say that [f,g] and f+g are the same thing
>
I've been lurking on this thread, collecting the valuable feedback. Thanks
all.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
>
> Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like it's
>>
What kind of performance do you actually need? Can your network
connection actually sustain the bandwidth of your synthetic benchmarks?
This is just an exercise at the moment, so no particular performance
goal beyond "how fast can it go".
(tested using apache-bench, loopback interface, amd64
On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
it's slow or buggy. I
Oh, two more under "buggy":
(a) as mentioned by others, the ghc repos often cause darcs2 to spin
without doing anything. (This may secretly be the netwo
On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
it's slow or buggy. I
slow: see ghc moving away from darcs. once you reach a certain
number of patches, it becomes *very* slow --- even with darcs 2's
speedups.
buggy: t
On 2008 Aug 3, at 13:15, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"I would contribute to darcs if only..."
I haven't used darcs much, so it's possible that I'll be forced to
start contributing by my own binding hypothetical.
I would contribut
Excerpts from Andrew Coppin's message of Sun Aug 03 04:35:32 -0500 2008:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but... I was under the impression that Darcs is
> a revision control system. It controls revisions.
>
> Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
> it's slow or buggy. I
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:31 +, Roly Perera wrote:
> Daniel Fischer web.de> writes:
>
> > Which implementation are you using?
> > IIRC, GHC didn't have it in Control.Monad before the 6.8 branch.
>
> Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's not in the Prelude but it is in Control
Ketil Malde wrote:
(Anybody with write access to the front page who
can make a note of minimum version required to 'darcs get' the
repository?)
I've submitted a patch. For reference, here's how to change the website:
0. get yourself a working darcs 2 by installing a binary or building the
sou
What about the part that reads:
The unique arrow f making this diagram commute is then
correspondingly denoted f1 ∐ f2 or f1 ⊕ f2 or f1 + f2 or
[f1, f2]
This would seem to say that [f,g] and f+g are the same thing
-- but if I've understood Derek Elkins' remarks, the latter is
Trent W. Buck wrote:
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*. I had to
point out that it was a *release* announcement -- how could a d
bradypus:
> Suppose I've:
>
> f = map g
>
> I want to know how much time it takes (interpreted mode) to fully
> process list xs (at least 1e6 elements) with function g. Is it
> sufficient to execute:
>
> *Main> last . f $ xs
>
> (x.xx secs, yyy bytes)
>
> Are there any hidden difficu
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Arie Groeneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, should go the forum.
>
> Ok, thanks. In this case the list consists of 6-digit alphanumeric
> codes. So doing something like:
>
> foldl1 (\x y -> g y) xs
No, that still doesn't force elements. Let's say g is (+
Am Sonntag, 3. August 2008 19:03 schrieb Jason Dusek:
> So I guess the Wikipedia page has an error in it?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coproduct#Definition
One typo, it must be f_j = f o i_j instead of f_j = i_j o f, apart from that
it looks correct.
Didn't go through the examples, thoug
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Haskellers,
>
> I would like to take an informal poll for the purposes of darcs
> recruitment. Could you please complete this sentence for me?
>
> "I would contribute to darcs if only..."
>
I haven't used darcs much, so
On Aug 03, 2008, at 5:36 pm, Ketil Malde wrote:
Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
from the tarball. (Anybody with write access to the front page who
can make a note of minimum version required
So I guess the Wikipedia page has an error in it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coproduct#Definition
--
_jsn
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Derek Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The notation f+g is the notation for the functorial action of
> + : CxC -> C on arrows, that is, if f : A -> B and g : C -> D
> then f+g : A+C -> B+D.
So [f,g] and f+g different. I assumed that the functorial
action of + on arrows was to take ((A -> C)
Arie,
foldl1 is not strict in its function argument. Using it will cause stack
overflows for large lists.
For example:
GHCi, version 6.8.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package base ... linking ... done.
Prelude> foldl1 (+) [0..100]
*** Exception: stack overflow
foldl1
Gwern Branwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just darcs get http://darcs.net, so I would guess it was either temporary
> or a problem on your end.
Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
from the tar
On Aug 03, 2008, at 3:36 pm, David Bremner wrote:
I think this view is probably coloured by your background in web
development. I have used git for about a year now, and never visited
GitHub. I'm not saying you have to like git, but it does have other
features other than a snazzy web site.
H
Daniel Fischer web.de> writes:
> Which implementation are you using?
> IIRC, GHC didn't have it in Control.Monad before the 6.8 branch.
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not in the Prelude but it is in Control.Monad in base version 3
> and later. You're probably using an older G
Am Sonntag, 3. August 2008 16:52 schrieb Roly Perera:
> > I'm obviously missing something basic here but I don't seem to be able to
> > use the >=> operator which is apparently defined in the Prelude and also
> > in Control.Monad.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't very clear in my original posting. What I meant
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 14:52 +, Roly Perera wrote:
> > I'm obviously missing something basic here but I don't seem to be able to
> > use
> > the >=> operator which is apparently defined in the Prelude and also in
> > Control.Monad.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't very clear in my original posting. What I
On 2008.08.03 16:26:32 +0200, Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled 0.7K
characters:
> "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>
> >> I don't know why, but a lot of people
> I'm obviously missing something basic here but I don't seem to be able to use
> the >=> operator which is apparently defined in the Prelude and also in
> Control.Monad.
Sorry, I wasn't very clear in my original posting. What I meant to say is that
the compiler seems to be unable to find a defin
Hi,
I'm obviously missing something basic here but I don't seem to be able to use
the >=> operator which is apparently defined in the Prelude and also in
Control.Monad.
My imports are:
import Prelude hiding (abs, lookup, init)
import Data.Maybe
import Data.List as List hiding (lookup, insert, d
At Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:23:21 +0100,
Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> GitHub is responsible for git's popularity. Git is so popular not
> because it's the best, but because it has the best Web 2.0 site. I
> work primarily in web development and it did occur to me to have a
> stab at darcshub, but I didn't
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
>> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their
>
On Aug 03, 2008, at 12:53 pm, Lele Gaifax wrote:
I fail to see what's so cool with GitHub: a quick overview didn't
reveal anything that couldn't be done with, say, Trac+Darcs. Can you
elaborate on that?
Hi Lele
It probably doesn't do anything you couldn't in Trac+darcs. But
that's not the
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 19:13 -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
> My measurements show that a simple dummy server (accept, forkio,
> recv byte) handles roughly 7500 requests/connects per second,
> the server/client that do real messages do about 4500 req and
> connections per second. If all requests are on
Sorry for the duplication, I'm now on the haskell-cafe list and wanted
to track the other half of this thread.
On Aug 03, 2008, at 8:36 am, Don Stewart wrote:
And all this delay while the git juggernaut takes over the internet.
That's the biggest tragedy. It's the same disappointment I h
Sorry, should go the forum.
Ok, thanks. In this case the list consists of 6-digit alphanumeric
codes. So doing something like:
foldl1 (\x y -> g y) xs
will do the job?
=@@i
Bulat Ziganshin schreef:
Hello Arie,
Sunday, August 3, 2008, 1:56:43 PM, you wrote:
*Main>> last . f $ xs
this way
Hello Arie,
Sunday, August 3, 2008, 1:56:43 PM, you wrote:
*Main>> last . f $ xs
this way you will get only "spin" of list computed, not elements
itself. something like sum should be used instead
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
newsham:
Anyone interested in critiquing some code? I'm looking for ideas
for making it faster and/or simpler:
What optimisation and runtime flags did you use (-threaded or not?)
currently "ghc -O --make $< -o $@". For some measurements I tried
-threaded which seemed to have a slight slowdo
Suppose I've:
f = map g
I want to know how much time it takes (interpreted mode) to fully
process list xs (at least 1e6 elements) with function g. Is it
sufficient to execute:
*Main> last . f $ xs
(x.xx secs, yyy bytes)
Are there any hidden difficulties involved?
Reason is: compar
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 00:52 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
> Derek Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Dusek wrote:
> > > the unique arrow that goes from A+B to C+C is f+g -- but
> > > that would make C+C just the same as C.
> >
> > The unique arrow is f* : (A,B) -> (C,C), -not- an arrow A+B ->
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:04:28 -0500
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The braces mean that the given number of octets follows after the CRLF
> at the end of the given line. We could even see:
>
> A283 SEARCH {4} {21}
> TEXTstring not in mailbox
I don't think it's quite that bad. The
Derek Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dusek wrote:
> > the unique arrow that goes from A+B to C+C is f+g -- but
> > that would make C+C just the same as C.
>
> The unique arrow is f* : (A,B) -> (C,C), -not- an arrow A+B ->
> C+C. An arrow f : A+B -> C does -not- uniquely determine an
> a
On 2008 Aug 3, at 1:17, Trent W. Buck wrote:
"Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their
face to
That wou
trentbuck:
> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>
> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
> convince them that darcs was still bei
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 23:40 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote:
> Derek Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [id,id] is the counit.
> > [id,id] : C+C -> C
> > Given a function f : A+B -> C there exists a unique function
> > f* : (A,B) -> (C,C) that is a pair of functions
> > h : A -> C and k : B -> C such t
"Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*.
57 matches
Mail list logo
