Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Jan 18, at 13:47, Matti Niemenmaa wrote:
3. Coadjute keeps track of command line arguments (see docs for
details): for me this is really a killer feature, I don't know of
anything else which does this.
It's been done many times before; it never
Paul Moore wrote:
2009/1/18 Matti Niemenmaa matti.niemenmaa+n...@iki.fi:
Announcing the release of Coadjute, version 0.0.1!
[...]
Portability is striven towards in two ways:
Is it intended to work on Windows? (I don't want to spend time
downloading and trying to set it up if it was never
Excerpts from Matti Niemenmaa's message of Sun Jan 18 19:47:46 +0100 2009:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Matti Niemenmaa schrieb:
Announcing the release of Coadjute, version 0.0.1!
Web site: http://iki.fi/matti.niemenmaa/coadjute/
Hackage:
Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Excerpts from Matti Niemenmaa's message of Sun Jan 18 19:47:46 +0100 2009:
3. Coadjute keeps track of command line arguments (see docs for
details): for me this is really a killer feature, I don't know of
anything else which does this.
ocamlbuild does
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Matti Niemenmaa schrieb:
Announcing the release of Coadjute, version 0.0.1!
Web site: http://iki.fi/matti.niemenmaa/coadjute/
Hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/Coadjute
snip
How does it compare to
Matti Niemenmaa schrieb:
Anyway, hake looks interesting but it's not a replacement for Coadjute;
and neither is Coadjute for hake. To be completely honest I'm not sure
what use case hake is meant to solve: how does it improve over plain make?
It seems to be programmable, and thus may better
On 2009 Jan 18, at 13:47, Matti Niemenmaa wrote:
3. Coadjute keeps track of command line arguments (see docs for
details): for me this is really a killer feature, I don't know of
anything else which does this.
It's been done many times before; it never seems to catch on. My
