On 2008 Aug 6, at 2:02, Ketil Malde wrote:
Ben Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Can I convert my working repos to darcs-2?
No. You cannot push or pull between darcs-2 format repos and
darcs-1 or
hashed format repos. This might not be optimal but is
understandable, since
the theory
Ben Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can I convert my working repos to darcs-2?
> No. You cannot push or pull between darcs-2 format repos and darcs-1 or
> hashed format repos. This might not be optimal but is understandable, since
> the theory underlying the darcs-2 repository format is
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
(Hm, I feel a blog rant coming on.)
I take it you mean as the perfect example of how to kill off interest in
your own project :-) I can't help thinking this was so obviously going
to happen that it must have been Davids intent at the time he wrote
that announceme
Ketil Malde wrote:
> The consequences of moving to the darcs-2 format are a bit unclear to
> me. For instance, I'd like to keep my main (export) repo in darcs-1
> format, in order to make it as accessible as possible (Ubuntu still
> ships with darcs-1.0.9, and that's a fairly cutting edge
> distrib
Andrew Coppin wrote:
> Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
>> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
>> convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*. I had to
>> point out that it was a *relea
Ashley Moran wrote:
> On Aug 03, 2008, at 3:36 pm, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> I think this view is probably coloured by your background in web
>> development. I have used git for about a year now, and never visited
>> GitHub. I'm not saying you have to like git, but it does have other
>> features
Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Aug 03, 2008, at 5:36 pm, Ketil Malde wrote:
>> Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
>> which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
>> from the tarball. (Anybody with write access to the front page
On 2008 Aug 3, at 19:16, Ben Franksen wrote:
The naive way to emulate your split feature would be to create a
branch
where you delete all the stuff you don't want and then maybe move the
subproject to a new directory (nearer the top-level). This doesn't
work,
however, at least not in pract
Luke Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "I would contribute to darcs if only..."
>>
>
> I haven't used darcs much, so it's possible that I'll be forced to start
> contributing by my own binding hypothetical.
>
> I would contribute to darcs
I've been lurking on this thread, collecting the valuable feedback. Thanks
all.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
>
> Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like it's
>>
On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
it's slow or buggy. I
Oh, two more under "buggy":
(a) as mentioned by others, the ghc repos often cause darcs2 to spin
without doing anything. (This may secretly be the netwo
On 2008 Aug 3, at 5:35, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
it's slow or buggy. I
slow: see ghc moving away from darcs. once you reach a certain
number of patches, it becomes *very* slow --- even with darcs 2's
speedups.
buggy: t
Excerpts from Andrew Coppin's message of Sun Aug 03 04:35:32 -0500 2008:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but... I was under the impression that Darcs is
> a revision control system. It controls revisions.
>
> Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
> it's slow or buggy. I
Trent W. Buck wrote:
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*. I had to
point out that it was a *release* announcement -- how could a d
On Aug 03, 2008, at 5:36 pm, Ketil Malde wrote:
Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
from the tarball. (Anybody with write access to the front page who
can make a note of minimum version required
Gwern Branwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just darcs get http://darcs.net, so I would guess it was either temporary
> or a problem on your end.
Seems I needed a newer darcs - the one shipped with Ubuntu is 1.0.9,
which appears to be too old, and it works when I build a new 2.0.2
from the tar
On Aug 03, 2008, at 3:36 pm, David Bremner wrote:
I think this view is probably coloured by your background in web
development. I have used git for about a year now, and never visited
GitHub. I'm not saying you have to like git, but it does have other
features other than a snazzy web site.
H
On 2008.08.03 16:26:32 +0200, Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled 0.7K
characters:
> "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>
> >> I don't know why, but a lot of people
At Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:23:21 +0100,
Ashley Moran wrote:
>
> GitHub is responsible for git's popularity. Git is so popular not
> because it's the best, but because it has the best Web 2.0 site. I
> work primarily in web development and it did occur to me to have a
> stab at darcshub, but I didn't
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
>> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their
>
On Aug 03, 2008, at 12:53 pm, Lele Gaifax wrote:
I fail to see what's so cool with GitHub: a quick overview didn't
reveal anything that couldn't be done with, say, Trac+Darcs. Can you
elaborate on that?
Hi Lele
It probably doesn't do anything you couldn't in Trac+darcs. But
that's not the
Sorry for the duplication, I'm now on the haskell-cafe list and wanted
to track the other half of this thread.
On Aug 03, 2008, at 8:36 am, Don Stewart wrote:
And all this delay while the git juggernaut takes over the internet.
That's the biggest tragedy. It's the same disappointment I h
On 2008 Aug 3, at 1:17, Trent W. Buck wrote:
"Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their
face to
That wou
trentbuck:
> "Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
>
> I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
> impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
> convince them that darcs was still bei
"Neil Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The darcs 2.0 announcement read like an obituary
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*.
25 matches
Mail list logo
