Hi,
I am writing a small program using LDAP hackage. A weird problem occured.
When the code was run by runhaskell, things were fine, worked as expected.
But when ghc compiled (no any args), and ran, I got this: LDAP
error: ldapSimpleBind: LDAPException LdapServerDown(-1): Can't contact
LDAP s
Can you paste your code somewhere? I'm using the LDAP package at work (for
authenticating a Yesod app) and a quick test of the basic LDAP package in GHCi
works for me:
λ> import LDAP
λ> ldap <- ldapInit "10.0.0.12" ldapPort
λ> ldapSimpleBind ldap "geva" "**"
λ> let desiredAttr = LDAPAtt
Hi there,
The code could not be simpler. Just ldapInit, ldapSimpleBind.
I just found that the code works with ghci, too. So to sum up,
ghci/runhaskell works, ghc not.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Vincent Ambo wrote:
> Can you paste your code somewhere? I'm using the LDAP package at work (
If it is simple then please paste it somewhere. Perhaps stackoverflow
would be a better medium for this discussion.
-Thomas
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> Hi there,
> The code could not be simpler. Just ldapInit, ldapSimpleBind.
> I just found that the code wor
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds <
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> The code could not be simpler. Just ldapInit, ldapSimpleBind.
> I just found that the code works with ghci, too. So to sum up,
> ghci/runhaskell works, ghc not.
A possibility that occu
Versions:
libldap2 2.4.28
LDAP 0.6.6
ghc 7.4.1
Code below:
import LDAP
main :: IO ()
main = do
let domain = "vancloa.cn"
bindDN = "CN=wangshida.admin,OU=admin_accounts,DC=vancloa,DC=cn"
bindPW = ""
baseDN = Just "DC=vancloa,DC=cn"
ldapFilter = Just ("(&(sAMAccou
on GHC-7.4.1, and maybe the others haven’t
either.)
Chris
From: haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org
[mailto:haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Allbery
Sent: 25 May 2012 04:21
To: Magicloud Magiclouds
Cc: Haskell-Cafe
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference
ery
> Sent: 25 May 2012 04:21
> To: Magicloud Magiclouds
> Cc: Haskell-Cafe
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and
> compile?
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> The cod
10:12
To: Chris Dornan
Cc: Brandon Allbery; Haskell-Cafe
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and
compile?
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed reply. I am using ghc 7.4.1 and LDAP 0.6.6.
When you said "configuration of the OpenLDAP client library", may I
about? (I don’t think I have tested this on GHC-7.4.1, and maybe the others
>> haven’t either.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org
>> [mailto:haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org]
om: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 May 2012 10:12
> To: Chris Dornan
> Cc: Brandon Allbery; Haskell-Cafe
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and
> compile?
>
> Hi,
> Sorry for the delayed reply. I am
t;>
>> Chris
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 27 May 2012 10:12
>> To: Chris Dornan
>> Cc: Brandon Allbery; Haskell-Cafe
>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the d
> Sorry for the wrong information. I made a mistake when did the test.
> After more testing, I think it is a bug of ghc 7.4.1. Until now, I cannot
> find a way to make ghc 7.4.1 compiled binary work.
It sounds like this should be looked at further. Somebody should verify try to
repeat what you
> Sorry for the wrong information. I made a mistake when did the test.
> After more testing, I think it is a bug of ghc 7.4.1. Until now, I cannot
> find a way to make ghc 7.4.1 compiled binary work.
I have set up this test on 7.4.1 and I cannot recreate the problem -- compiling
and running an e
Interesting. I have this code tested in Debian unstable/stable, CentOS
6.1, all 64 bit, with two different version of libldap2.
At first, Debian-s were installed with 7.4.1, CentOS with 7.2.2. Only
in CentOS the code connected after compiled.
Then I removed 7.4.1 from Debian stable and installed 7.
On 29 May 2012 02:21, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> Interesting. I have this code tested in Debian unstable/stable, CentOS
> 6.1, all 64 bit, with two different version of libldap2.
> At first, Debian-s were installed with 7.4.1, CentOS with 7.2.2. Only
> in CentOS the code connected after compile
I will send the header and object files off list.
Here is the test program I am using:
import LDAP
main :: IO ()
main =
do putStrLn "domain>"
domain <- getLine
putStrLn "bindDN>"
bindDN <- getLine
putStrLn "bindPW>"
bindPW <- getLine
putStrLn
A little information.
I did not notice the gcc/binutils versions. But in CentOS, the ghc
7.2.2/7.4.1 were all compiled myself with all default configurations.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Chris Dornan wrote:
> On 29 May 2012 02:21, Magicloud Magiclouds
> wrote:
>> Interesting. I have this c
ing the problem.
>>
>> Did you try to running the variants that read address, account and passwords
>> from standard input? Did it show the same perverse behaviour?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Magicloud Magic
gt;>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 01 June 2012 02:01
>>> To: Chris Dornan
>>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and
>&g
e big difference here is: the failed one sent unbindRequest before
>>>> got bindResponse success.
>>>> Just a clue, I have no idea what is going on
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Chris Dornan wrote:
>>>>> No problem -- I have at
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:41:43AM +0800, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> Sorry for the attachments. They are wireshark files.
May I suggest not sending multi-megabyte files of limited interest down
a widely subscribed list? Contrary to popular belief, bandwidth, time
and spool storage isn't free.
Sorry for that. The problem got solved yesterday.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Lars Viklund wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:41:43AM +0800, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>> Sorry for the attachments. They are wireshark files.
>
> May I suggest not sending multi-megabyte files of limited inte
23 matches
Mail list logo
