Jonathan Stowe wrote:
But hey on the bright side it looks like you now know what it thinks
your password is :-)
Or would've been, because it didn't think it knew the address at all.
The bug's been leaned on to produce a more obvious error, but I haven't
fixed the cause as I don't know what wa
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 11:45 -0700, David King wrote:
> I changed my email address subscribed to this list a while ago, and
> after the "the verdamnit subscription database got truncated while
> doing a server move", I was re-subscribed under both addresses, so I
> tried to unsubscribe the old
It was thus said that the Great David Cantrell once stated:
>
> The hateful software part of it is, of course, that the software decides
> to waste the time of people posting to mailing lists to which its master
> has subscribed by ignoring the List-Id header. But tbh, I hate Daniel
> more than I
I changed my email address subscribed to this list a while ago, and
after the "the verdamnit subscription database got truncated while
doing a server move", I was re-subscribed under both addresses, so I
tried to unsubscribe the old address. Tough luck, looks like /usr/
local/bin/tequila is
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> This:
>
> > Thank you for your email to dan...@kickidle.com...
>
> The hateful software part of it is, of course, that the software decides
> to waste the time of people posting to mailing lists to which its master
> has subscribed
> > > a) I DO NOT respond to the challenge when the mail is legit.
> > Nor do I, although I will once I get the challenge from Fuckwit
> > about my message moaning about him.
> well, if you do get one; nowadays most of them seem not to send
> challenges to mail addresses they've already sent a chal
Hi David,
* David Cantrell [2007-04-03 16:00]:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:32:57PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> > a) I DO NOT respond to the challenge when the mail is legit.
>
> Nor do I, although I will once I get the challenge from Fuckwit
> about my message moaning about him.
well, if you
MS Word is supposed to support footnotes. By "support", I mean "make it possible
to insert footnotes and automatically maintain their numbers when more footnotes
are added/deleted". By "supposed", I mean that there's an "Insert footnotes" dialog.
So I open that dialog, and talk to it, and say t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 03:32:57PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> a) I DO NOT respond to the challenge when the mail is legit.
Nor do I, although I will once I get the challenge from Fuckwit about my
message moaning about him.
> b) I ALWAYS respond to the challenge when the mail is spam.
Never.
Hi David,
* David Cantrell [2007-04-03 15:15]:
> This:
>
> > Thank you for your email to dan...@kickidle.com...
> > ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AND HIT SEND.
> > The long version:
> > Thanks for your email! However, I now get over 150 spam
> > emails a day. That's just too many to
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:10:45 +0100, David Cantrell
wrote:
Hmm, the subject made me want to post something non-software related, but
that would be OffTopic and probably inappropriate to use in a follow-up
on this mail ...
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
This:
> Thank you for your email to dan...@kickidle.com...
> ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AND HIT SEND.
> The long version:
> Thanks for your email! However, I now get over 150 spam emails a day.
> That's just too many to handle. And unfortunately, my automatic filters like
>
Dear pg_dump,
Further to our recent encounter, which I shall summarise thus:
% pg_dump --no-owner --clean --create foo > foo.sql
pg_dump: [archiver] -C and -c are incompatible options
If you're going to bitch at me for passing in incompatible options,
you could do worse than t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:57:04AM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
> Well, the message was ranked 2.6 by a DEAR_SOMETHING heuristic, and ended
> up classified as "spam" (5.3) due to the combined efforts of other
> incomprehensible mail-header heuristics. Is it really that bad to start a
> message w
Yossi Kreinin wrote:
Is it really that bad to start
a message with "Dear Something", and even if it is, is it really more
typical of spam messages than other messages?
Tangential, but I was reflecting on why I find Email has become a more
tiresome medium to use over the years. I have looked
Yossi Kreinin wrote:
Well, the message was ranked 2.6 by a DEAR_SOMETHING heuristic, and
ended up classified as "spam" (5.3) due to the combined efforts of
other incomprehensible mail-header heuristics. Is it really that bad
to start a message with "Dear Something", and even if it is, is it
real
Yesterday I saw a spam filter insert a "PROBABLY-SPAM" warning into the subject
line of an innocent message. It also appended what looked like detailed
reasoning to the body of the message: a list of UNDERSCORE_SEPARATED heuristic
names accompanied by a score value. It also said that the overall
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> World of Warcraft, that exquisitely designed casino with elves sucking in
> billions of man-hours from all across the globe. And they deserve it. If
> you've never played it, I'd suggest getting yourself a 10 day trial just to
> see what a really well designed and easy
18 matches
Mail list logo
