On 2007-09-27 at 06:56 -0500, tgies wrote:
>
> #FF
> Comic Sans MS
> Hello
> . Oh my God.
Youshouldbegratefulthat
thisisnotMathML
.
&emdash;Phil
On 9/27/07, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> One of us must be. Perhaps it was my sarcasm, perhaps I completely
> misunderstood your point. To help clear this up:
Okay, see, I thought you were being sarcastic the other way around,
because I can't imagine why anyone would honestly think that.
tgies
On 27 Sep 2007, at 11:04, Earle Martin wrote:
In the old Mac OS, you'd get folders called "Copy of Foo-Bar-0.1" and
"Copy 2 of Foo-Bar-0.1", etc. Whoever replaced this behavior with the
current braindead one is a goddamn moron.
Still does when you copy files. The borkheaded logic is somewhere i
On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:10, Tony Finch wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I would like, at this point, to pimp YAML a little.
Not at all over-engineered!
Also I'm wary of any technology that calls itself "yet another"
something.
(Yeah yeah, I know YAML officially stand
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> I would like, at this point, to pimp YAML a little.
Not at all over-engineered!
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY, BACKING NORTHEASTERLY FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SLIGHT OR
MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY P
On 9/27/07, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >
> > I would like, at this point, to pimp YAML a little.
>
> Not at all over-engineered!
>
Ingy tried to make XML refugees feel at home.
--
There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is
'dead'. --
On 9/27/07, Adam Atlas wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2007, at 13:33, Sean Conner wrote:
>
> > So, you're saying you would rather have:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Ick. Or does it go:
> >
> > [...]
> >
>
> Ick indeed!
>
> I think a decent rule of thumb is that attributes are for parameters
> that a
a followup from another group. plenty of hate here.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:22:13PM -, camrex_chi wrote:
> I think you will find that files in:
> C:\Program Files\\server1\ are not being read as you think.
>
> Instead it is reading the files located in:
> C:\Users\\AppData\Local\VirtualSt
On 27 Sep 2007, at 13:33, Sean Conner wrote:
So, you're saying you would rather have:
[...]
Ick. Or does it go:
[...]
Ick indeed!
I think a decent rule of thumb is that attributes are for parameters
that are not displayed to the user directly, while sub-elements are
It was thus said that the Great Daniel Pittman once stated:
> "Tony Gies" writes:
> > On 9/27/07, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> ...you were going so well and then, suddenly...
> >
> > I think one of us is missing something here, because you appear
> > actually to be agreeing with me completely?
>
>
It's the same for Oracle 9i and 10g, I'm afraid.
We've had to change our security spec/docs so we can "minimize less" by
requiring X11 libraries to be installed on our systems. The DBAs want to
keep that stuff around, too, for OEM and friends.
On 9/27/07, Roger Burton West wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:51:11AM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote:
>Requiring a GUI
>to do things on a Unix system is a special kind of hate.
See also Oracle. Somewhere I still have my "how to install Oracle 8 on a
sanely-configured Unix system, and what you'll have to install
beforehand and remove a
Dear Siebel,
When I run the installer on my Solaris box as "./setupsol -console" I expect
that the installer remains in a CLI-mode. This does not mean execute the
first half of the install process from the command line and then launch a
portion of the X-windows installer. I just happened to have E
"Tony Gies" writes:
> On 9/27/07, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> ...you were going so well and then, suddenly...
>
> I think one of us is missing something here, because you appear
> actually to be agreeing with me completely?
One of us must be. Perhaps it was my sarcasm, perhaps I completely
misunde
On 9/27/07, tgies wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > Erm... you do actually know that this - why do the SGML-derived mark-up
> > languages have both elements and attributes and what should be an
> > element and what should be an attribute - is an argument (or a religious
> > war, wh
On 9/27/07, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> ...you were going so well and then, suddenly...
I think one of us is missing something here, because you appear
actually to be agreeing with me completely?
tgies
On 9/27/07, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Erm... you do actually know that this - why do the SGML-derived mark-up
> languages have both elements and attributes and what should be an
> element and what should be an attribute - is an argument (or a religious
> war, whichever way you look at it) that has
tgies writes:
> Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
> can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
> raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
> procedural imperative programming languages. Fine. Fine. I suppose I
On 9/27/07, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Yes, Windows has introduced the hateful concept of blocking OUTGOING ports to
> prevent virus laden machines from spreading their ooze.
Or nosy software "phoning home" with juicy data about users' machines.
Which is also hateful.
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> tgies wrote:
>> Attention jerks,
>> Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
>> can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
>> raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
>> procedural imperativ
Today I found out that certain Ruby environments (I discovered this
playing around with XChat's Ruby scripting plugin, as an exercise in
determining whether or not this Ruby tripe the kids won't shut up
about is any good), when asked to unload a given module/script
containing a single static method
tgies wrote:
> Attention jerks,
> Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
> can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
> raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
> procedural imperative programming languages. Fine. F
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:56:06AM -0500, tgies wrote:
> Attention jerks,
> Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
> can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
> raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
> procedural
Struan Donald wrote:
> I might be a bit old fashioned but I've always thought the point of
> firewalls was to stop software on other computers connecting to my
> computer (or network but let's not run just yet).
>
> Symantec seems to find this rather a narrow definition and is keen to
> stop softw
Attention jerks,
Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
procedural imperative programming languages. Fine. Fine. I suppose I
can't
Attention jerks,
Okay, so you're going to use XML for every imaginable thing which you
can possibly contrive a way to use XML for, including uncompressed RGB
raster images, large relational databases, and the syntax for new
procedural imperative programming languages. Fine. Fine. I suppose I
can't
You may have a tarball you wish to open, named, say,
Foo-Bar-0.1.tar.gz. If you double-click it, it expands to a folder
called, predictably, Foo-Bar-0.1. However, if you then double-click it
again (without removing the first expanded folder), it produces a
folder called... Foo-Bar-0.2. Again? Foo-B
On 26/09/2007, Struan Donald wrote:
>
> I might be a bit old fashioned but I've always thought the point of
> firewalls was to stop software on other computers connecting to my
> computer (or network but let's not run just yet).
>
> Symantec seems to find this rather a narrow definition and is kee
I might be a bit old fashioned but I've always thought the point of
firewalls was to stop software on other computers connecting to my
computer (or network but let's not run just yet).
Symantec seems to find this rather a narrow definition and is keen to
stop software on my computer connecting to
29 matches
Mail list logo
