Re: Web candy

On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Peter da Silva wrote: My Macbook Pro just piped up and started complaining about the temperature. Both cores running at 80%, for I don't know how long. So I go to see who's responsible. Safari. Why? Well, because I don't have a Flashblock for Safari (need to look

Re: Web candy

* Peter da Silva [2009-03-04 14:00]: > Well, because I don't have a Flashblock for Safari (need to > look for that again). http://github.com/rentzsch/clicktoflash/tree/master Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: Web candy

On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Peter da Silva wrote: My Macbook Pro just piped up and started complaining about the temperature. Both cores running at 80%, for I don't know how long. So I go to see who's responsible. Safari. Why? Well, because I don't have a Flashblock for Safari (need to look

Re: Apple Mail "security"

Phil Pennock writes: > Who runs the hotspot? Well in the UK it sounds like it's mainly going to be unwitting BT Business Broadband customers who didn't spot paragraph 4 of an upgrade announcement -- and so didn't opt out of BT turning them into a hotspot: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/2

Web candy

My Macbook Pro just piped up and started complaining about the temperature. Both cores running at 80%, for I don't know how long. So I go to see who's responsible. Safari. Why? Well, because I don't have a Flashblock for Safari (need to look for that again). Hidden away in the tabs was one

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On 2009-03-04, at 02:53, Joshua Juran wrote: Does mentioning PHP run afoul of Godwin's Law now? Only a Nazi would say something like that.

Re: Apple Mail "security"

Peter Corlett writes: > On 4 Mar 2009, at 10:56, Matthew King wrote: > > [ Assuming you meant to send this to the list and now find some > > combination of your MUA and the list software more hateful than you > > did previously. ] > > [ Correct. Reply-To: munging considered less hateful than not

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On 2009-03-04, at 02:14, Joshua Juran wrote: On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Léon Brocard wrote: 2009/3/4 Phil Pennock : You truly are unable to have a rationale debate Please stop. You're not hating software. For example, I hate software. Especially software that pretends to be a web fra

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On 4 Mar 2009, at 10:56, Matthew King wrote: [ Assuming you meant to send this to the list and now find some combination of your MUA and the list software more hateful than you did previously. ] [ Correct. Reply-To: munging considered less hateful than not doing so. ] [...] [1] As an aside,

Re: Apple Mail "security"

[ Assuming you meant to send this to the list and now find some combination of your MUA and the list software more hateful than you did previously. ] Peter Corlett writes: > On 4 Mar 2009, at 08:35, Matthew King wrote: >> Joshua Juran writes: > [...] >>> PHP. >> Is that the "Mornington Crescent

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Matthew King wrote: Joshua Juran writes: On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Léon Brocard wrote: 2009/3/4 Phil Pennock : You truly are unable to have a rationale debate Please stop. You're not hating software. For example, I hate software. Especially software that

Re: Apple Mail "security"

Joshua Juran writes: On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Léon Brocard wrote: 2009/3/4 Phil Pennock : You truly are unable to have a rationale debate Please stop. You're not hating software. For example, I hate software. Especially software that pretends to be a web framework. Or software that r

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Léon Brocard wrote: 2009/3/4 Phil Pennock : You truly are unable to have a rationale debate Please stop. You're not hating software. For example, I hate software. Especially software that pretends to be a web framework. Or software that requires me to decide upo

Re: Apple Mail "security"

2009/3/4 Phil Pennock : > You truly are unable to have a rationale debate Please stop. You're not hating software. For example, I hate software. Especially software that pretends to be a web framework. Or software that requires me to decide upon a schema at the beginning and then makes it hard t

Re: Apple Mail "security"

On 2009-03-03 at 13:12 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Phil Pennock wrote: > > On 2009-03-03 at 00:00 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> Phil Pennock wrote: > >>> On 2009-03-02 at 18:36 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Francisco Olarte Sanz wr