Abigail:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:41:17PM +0200, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
>> Joshua Juran:
>>> [2] Fetishes include extensionless filenames
>> Ok, I’ll bite.
>> I might’ve used extensionless filenames on my Linux desktop out of
>> æsthetic reason
Joshua Juran:
> [2] Fetishes include extensionless filenames
Ok, I’ll bite.
I might’ve used extensionless filenames on my Linux desktop out of
æsthetic reasons (which you might call fetishes and I’ll be happy about
it), and I stopped because Nautilus wouldn’t create picture previews
when the fil
Your Mutt munges my Mutt’s UTF-8. Hate.
Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:50:23AM +0100, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
> > Aristotle Pagaltzis:
> > > I used to use it back when I was on Win95. It was the best Win32
> > > GUI MUA around, by a margin
Aristotle Pagaltzis:
> I used to use it back when I was on Win95. It was the best Win32
> GUI MUA around, by a margin. (The next best choice was Outlook
> Express...)
You’re forgetting Pegasus Mail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_Mail
As for the original topic, looking at my ~/.mailfilter
Denny:
> The reason reply-to munging is more often useful than harmful, is
> that people more often wish to continue list discussions on the list
That’s why my MUA asks me whether I want to reply to the list when
I reply to an email from a list. I’m sorry if some other MUAs don’t,
but it’s a pers
