[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-199) Implement ReplicationManager to replicate ClosedContainers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547420#comment-16547420 ] Elek, Marton commented on HDDS-199: --- Rebased patch is uploaded... > Implement Replicatio

[jira] [Updated] (HDDS-199) Implement ReplicationManager to replicate ClosedContainers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Elek, Marton updated HDDS-199: -- Attachment: HDDS-199.011.patch > Implement ReplicationManager to replicate ClosedContainers > ---

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13688) Introduce msync API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547357#comment-16547357 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13688: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13076) [SPS]: Merge work for HDFS-10285

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547265#comment-16547265 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13076: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13736) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when 'dfs.namenode.block-placement-policy.default.prefer-local-node' set to false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] hu xiaodong updated HDFS-13736: --- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored node

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13736) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when 'dfs.namenode.block-placement-policy.default.prefer-local-node' set to false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] hu xiaodong updated HDFS-13736: --- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored node

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-255) TestOzoneConfigurationFields is failing as it's not able to find hdds.command.status.report.interval in config classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547224#comment-16547224 ] genericqa commented on HDDS-255: | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Su

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13688) Introduce msync API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547222#comment-16547222 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13688: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-249) Fail if multiple SCM IDs on the DataNode and add SCM ID check after version request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547220#comment-16547220 ] genericqa commented on HDDS-249: | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Su

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13688) Introduce msync API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547193#comment-16547193 ] Chen Liang commented on HDFS-13688: --- Post v001 patch for a Jenkins run. The main differ

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13688) Introduce msync API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chen Liang updated HDFS-13688: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Introduce msync API call > > >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13688) Introduce msync API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chen Liang updated HDFS-13688: -- Attachment: HDFS-13688-HDFS-12943.001.patch > Introduce msync API call > > >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13486) Backport HDFS-11817 (A faulty node can cause a lease leak and NPE on accessing data) to branch-2.7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547169#comment-16547169 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-13486: Thanks [~KarlManong] for raising the iss

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-13738: --- Description: Found an interesting bug. Execute following command as any non-privileged user:

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-249) Fail if multiple SCM IDs on the DataNode and add SCM ID check after version request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547150#comment-16547150 ] Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-249: - Fixed test case failures in patch v04.

[jira] [Updated] (HDDS-249) Fail if multiple SCM IDs on the DataNode and add SCM ID check after version request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Viswanadham updated HDDS-249: Attachment: HDDS-249.04.patch > Fail if multiple SCM IDs on the DataNode and add SCM ID check

[jira] [Updated] (HDDS-255) TestOzoneConfigurationFields is failing as it's not able to find hdds.command.status.report.interval in config classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Viswanadham updated HDDS-255: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestOzoneConfigurationFields is failing as it's not ab

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13622) dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547079#comment-16547079 ] Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-13622: -- Thanks [~kgyrtkirk] for creating the jira and [~shwe

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-13741) Cosmetic code improvement in XAttrFormat

Xiao Chen created HDFS-13741: Summary: Cosmetic code improvement in XAttrFormat Key: HDFS-13741 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13741 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13622) dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547013#comment-16547013 ] Shweta commented on HDFS-13622: --- [~xiaochen] I have submitted the patch. Please review. Tha

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-13622) dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547013#comment-16547013 ] Shweta edited comment on HDFS-13622 at 7/17/18 7:24 PM: Hi [~xiao

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-13622) dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547013#comment-16547013 ] Shweta edited comment on HDFS-13622 at 7/17/18 7:24 PM: Hi, [~xia

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13622) dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shweta updated HDFS-13622: -- Attachment: HDFS-13622.02.patch > dfs mkdir should not report the directory which to be created > -

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13076) [SPS]: Merge work for HDFS-10285

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16547008#comment-16547008 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13076: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-13150) [Edit Tail Fast Path] Allow SbNN to tail in-progress edits from JN via RPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik Krogen resolved HDFS-13150. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: HDFS-12943 Closing this as all sub-issues (HDFS-13607, HDFS

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13610) [Edit Tail Fast Path Pt 4] Cleanup: integration test, documentation, remove unnecessary dummy sync

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546979#comment-16546979 ] Erik Krogen commented on HDFS-13610: I just committed this based on [~shv]'s +1. Conf

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13610) [Edit Tail Fast Path Pt 4] Cleanup: integration test, documentation, remove unnecessary dummy sync

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik Krogen updated HDFS-13610: --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: HDFS-12943 Status: Reso

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13076) [SPS]: Merge work for HDFS-10285

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rakesh R updated HDFS-13076: Attachment: HDFS-13076-HDFS-10285-00.patch > [SPS]: Merge work for HDFS-10285 > ---

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13523) Support observer nodes in MiniDFSCluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546859#comment-16546859 ] Erik Krogen commented on HDFS-13523: Thanks for working on this [~zhengxg3]! A few co

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13740) Prometheus /metrics http endpoint for monitoring integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13740: --- Summary: Prometheus /metrics http endpoint for monitoring integration (was: Prometheus /metrics http

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-13740) Prometheus /metrics http endpoint for metrics monitoring integration

Hari Sekhon created HDFS-13740: -- Summary: Prometheus /metrics http endpoint for metrics monitoring integration Key: HDFS-13740 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13740 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546607#comment-16546607 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13738: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yuen-Kuei Hsueh updated HDFS-13738: --- Attachment: HDFS-13738.001.patch Target Version/s: 3.0.0 Status: Patch

[jira] [Work started] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HDFS-13738 started by Yuen-Kuei Hsueh. -- > fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546554#comment-16546554 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-13738: Thanks for proposing the fix! Added you

[jira] [Assigned] (HDFS-13738) fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is not privileged.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei-Chiu Chuang reassigned HDFS-13738: -- Assignee: Yuen-Kuei Hsueh > fsck -list-corruptfileblocks has infinite loop if user is

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Request to be able to disable Rack Local Write preference / Send All Replicas to differ

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Request to be able to disable Rack Local Write preference / Write All Replicas to diffe

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance ac

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546265#comment-16546265 ] Hari Sekhon edited comment on HDFS-13739 at 7/17/18 10:54 AM: -

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance leaves last data replica at risk, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across Da

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Summary: Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenanc

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance risks losing last remaining replica, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenance risks losing last remaining replica, 2. avoid Major Storage Imbalance across

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Summary: Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - 1. Rack-by-Rack Maintenanc

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - Whole Rack Maintenance without risk of only 1 remaining replica, and avoid Major Storage Imbalance acros

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Description: Current HDFS write pattern of "local node, rack local node, other rack node" is good fo

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13736) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when 'dfs.namenode.block-placement-policy.default.prefer-local-node' set to false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546391#comment-16546391 ] genericqa commented on HDFS-13736: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - Whole Rack Maintenance without risk of only 1 remaining replica, and avoid Major Storage Imbalance acros

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hari Sekhon updated HDFS-13739: --- Summary: Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid 2 issues - Whole Rack Maintenance wit

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13736) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when 'dfs.namenode.block-placement-policy.default.prefer-local-node' set to false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] hu xiaodong updated HDFS-13736: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 2.7.5) 3.2.0 Status: Patch Availabl

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13736) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when 'dfs.namenode.block-placement-policy.default.prefer-local-node' set to false

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] hu xiaodong updated HDFS-13736: --- Attachment: HDFS-13736.001.patch > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault can not choose favored nodes when > '

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13583) RBF: Router admin clrQuota is not synchronized with nameservice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546282#comment-16546282 ] Yiqun Lin commented on HDFS-13583: -- Hi [~dibyendu_hadoop], {quote} I am not aware if we

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid Major Storage Imbalance across DataNodes caused by uneven spread of Datanodes across Racks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546265#comment-16546265 ] Hari Sekhon commented on HDFS-13739: There are a couple of other good examples of whe

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-13739) Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid Major Storage Imbalance across DataNodes caused by uneven spread of Datanodes across Racks

Hari Sekhon created HDFS-13739: -- Summary: Option to disable Rack Local Write Preference to avoid Major Storage Imbalance across DataNodes caused by uneven spread of Datanodes across Racks Key: HDFS-13739 URL: https:

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-181) CloseContainer should commit all pending open Keys on a datanode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546152#comment-16546152 ] Mukul Kumar Singh commented on HDDS-181: Thanks for working on this issue [~shashik