Re: [Heb-NACO] help identifying word?

>From Shimon Kummer of NLI: יזיי"א= י'ראו ז'רע י'אריכו י'מים א'מן [cid:image001.jpg@01DA17E4.D78D6080] Dr. Ahava Cohen|Head Catalogui

Re: [Heb-NACO] Direct link to NLI authority file?

Mazal, the Israeli authority file, is available within the Community Zone of Alma (listed as NLI) and through the Union List of Israel OPAC at https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://uli.nli.org.il/F/?func=find-b-0&local_base=nlx10&con_lng=eng__;!!KGKeukY!y5Sp7g8XkbigpThQTYkSRTsmFjDxEiZcycWtCo7pReSRus

Re: [Heb-NACO] BFM: גפרית

Israeli pride is invested in our own authority system, Mazal (מאגר זהויות לאומי). We use LC to enhance the latin character side of our multiscript authorities through VIAF, but we do not use LC to manage authorities in our catalogs. Therefore the majority of our time is allotted to maintaining

Re: [Heb-NACO] [EXT] - Re: 046 Hebrew date coding in NARs

Yossi cited our old work practice of 5000 and adding 1240, so I thought I'd chime in with NLI's current policy within our authority database – like the recommendation which started this thread, if all we have is a Hebrew date we do code the two possible dates in 046. It takes an extra few second

Re: [Heb-NACO] Sacred work

While the RSC hasn't finalized plans for the Community Resources, a list of Jewish scared texts has been the example we've using for over a year when discussing future Resources tab content. IFLA Cataloging Section has also expressed an interest in publishing a subset of this kind of list (the

Re: [Heb-NACO] Sacred work

The new Toolkit is deliberately vague because the RSC is trying to move content which is biased in favor of a specific religion/cultural group out of the basic Toolkit and into the Resources tab. We know that religious works is an area which does require guidelines in the basic Toolkit, but at t

Re: [Heb-NACO] RAS Catalogers Winter Meeting - call for agenda items

The new Toolkit's Community Resources section and the Judiaca/Hebraica community – what sort of content should be in the section and who should be responsible for it. From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu] On Behalf Of Neil Manel Frau-Cortes via Heb-naco Sent: Tuesday, December

Re: [Heb-NACO] question regarding apparently duplicated NLI records

About #1091807807 I can say that this is not the same record as exists in our catalog. Our record is not hybrid and is correctly coded HEB (as well as $$e rda, which has dropped off the OCLC record). We have a 264#1 and not a 260 and, as evidenced by the 751, the place of publication is Tel Aviv