Re: Is the Gnu diction Package is bison and flex Candidate=

2007-08-02 Thread Hans (Req man)
Hans Aberg schreef: example 1: be able to = IdentifierBeginnerInstancesAdvised user action --- --- to be able to Yes be able to (weak definition) From the descripti

Re: Help .....

2007-08-02 Thread Joel E. Denny
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Arun K V wrote: > My requirement is a thread safe parser using lex and yacc. > Should I use a > > pure-parser > > push_pull > > Or something else? %pure-parser > Do I have to do this manually in the generated file, or is there a switch > that I can give to flex to get it

Re: Is the Gnu diction Package is bison and flex Candidate=

2007-08-02 Thread Hans Aberg
On 3 Aug 2007, at 00:13, Alfonso Urdaneta wrote: Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. The version I'm familiar with is "Time flies like the wind, fruit flies like bananas". A quick netsearch gives that both version are attributed to Groucho Marx, with no reference. As

Re: Is the Gnu diction Package is bison and flex Candidate=

2007-08-02 Thread Alfonso Urdaneta
Hans Aberg wrote: Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. The version I'm familiar with is "Time flies like the wind, fruit flies like bananas". -- alfonso e. urdaneta _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ This e-mail and any files tran

Re: Is the Gnu diction Package is bison and flex Candidate=

2007-08-02 Thread Hans Aberg
On 2 Aug 2007, at 21:33, Hans (Req man) wrote: This spelling out all possibilities brought to my mind the usage of flex and bison in one of my projects in the early nineties: Generalization example 1: 1. 'able to' /* I am able to ... */ 2. 'able to/*

Is the Gnu diction Package is bison and flex Candidate=

2007-08-02 Thread Hans (Req man)
Hi! Currently I am a user of the Gnu diction program. I am translating diction and style. Release 1.11 RC3 provides Dutch messages and can check the diction and style of Dutch documents. From the Gnu website http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/diction.html: "diction - Checks text for readability an

Re: Bison Version Compatibility

2007-08-02 Thread cwcaceres
Thank you to those who replied. I've decided to use Bison 2.1 and Flex 2.5.4. In case anyone wanted to know, there were problems compiling using VS 2003 (something about the iostream library) that went away when I used Dev-C++. Though I will probably use VS 2005 later on. cwcaceres wrote: > >

Re: Bison Version Compatibility

2007-08-02 Thread Matt Cupp
I've never used Bison++/Flex++, so I'm no use there. The C files are completely compatible with C++ and I've found unless you need multiple concurrent instances or thread safe, they work just fine. I just have my output files name with a .cpp and .hpp extensions. Hope that helps... Matt On 8/1/