Rodrigo Morales writes:
> [...]
> | 140M/gnu/store/qp8msw5js3gdpdlq1r8nxz4frnzc39lh-inkscape-1.1.1
> | 181M/gnu/store/3a7a5i1f4c917vlnzyy9d68s55ijiq50-inkscape-1.2.1
>
> I want to run v1.1.1 because I want to do some experiments to test the
> performance of these two versions. Preferably,
I think the following is the information you are looking for:
"Each /package/ may specify a simple package name, such as guile, optionally
followed by
an at-sign and version number, such as guile@3.0.7 or simply guile@3.0. In the
latter case,
the newest version prefixed by 3.0 is selected.”
I
"W. T. Meyer" writes:
> Is there a quick way in Guix to figure out which package provides which
> file similar to what other package managers provide with dnf
> provides/apt-file search/nix-locate etc.?
There's an open patch for a guix index command mention on the
guix-patches mailing list:
ht
The /gnu/store of my system contains two versions (1.1.1 and 1.2.1) of
Inkscape that are already built (see last two lines below)
,
| find /gnu/store -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -name '*inkscape*' -exec du
-hs {} + | sort -h
`
,
| 4.0K/gnu/store/500rmmh2b0m4abmhs3pv5888kfj7jmdh-inksca
Hi everyone,
Is there a quick way in Guix to figure out which package provides which
file similar to what other package managers provide with dnf
provides/apt-file search/nix-locate etc.?
So far I haven't found a command doing this reading documentation, but
maybe there's a way to query the subst
Hi everybody,
I use guix on trisquel 11. I have the following packages installed:
glibc-locales 2.35out
/gnu/store/03v1svhv6wj9pd6awpdi5zn4wd31b23f-glibc-locales-2.35
fontconfig 2.14.0 out
/gnu/store/90jrg5z1ywz5hpwka832q0g4skbaa4dj-fontconfig-2.14.0
gajim-omemo 2.8.15
Hi Wolf,
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 22:55, wolf wrote:
>
> On 2023-05-31 18:47:03 +0100, Graham Addis wrote:
> > I could use the equivalent format for --entry-point
> >
> > --entry-point executable --entry-point param1 --entry-point param2
> >
> I think that is a reasonable idea. Only downside is tha
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 23:04, wolf wrote:
> I did not know Guix does not currently support the shell form. In that light
> I
> think it should not be implemented, since once your idea (arguments for entry
> point) is implemented, it will be trivial for end-user to emulate it if so
> desired.
Tha
