Re: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-29 Thread WILLIAM DESALVO
What type of tissue cassette is being used? What type of insert or wrap is used. If one cassette processes correctly and the next to it does not, hard to say tissue processor is causing issue. Sounds like a water problem and it could be water trapped in cassette. Check the rest of you process

[Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-29 Thread Burnett, Brandy
We are having similar issues with our tissue. Any troubleshooting insight would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of Sue [suetp...@comcast.net] Sent:

[Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-24 Thread Tony Henwood (SCHN)
This seems like a classic case of drying of biopsies prior to fixation. This can occur if biopsies are placed on absorbent paper (or on disinfecting alcohol swabs, heaven forbid). From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu

[Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-22 Thread Morken, Timothy
One pathologist said it looks like the tissue has been cooked. Which could also be drying artifact after bx, before formalin. The only issue is we can have two biopsies right next to one another in the basket one looks good and one looks bad. My director also thinks it is the processors.

RE: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-22 Thread Arbaugh, Roberta
find a problem with the processor. Hope this help, Roberta -Original Message- From: Morken, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mor...@ucsf.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:16 AM To: Sue; Lisa Roy Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact One pathologist said

Re: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-22 Thread Sue
we do not use freeze spray in the lab at all. this issue has really gotten me bummed out since it is so sporadic. I am going to try to see if it is associated to one day in particular. it is one PA but multiple techs have identified the issue. ___

RE: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-22 Thread Jennifer MacDonald
, Timothy' timothy.mor...@ucsf.edu, Sue suetp...@comcast.net, Lisa Roy ro...@labcorp.com Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Date: 04/22/2015 11:32 AM Subject:RE: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact Sent by:histonet-boun

Re: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-22 Thread mucram11
, Timothy'; Subject:RE: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact Our pathologists also complained about some of the GI biopsies looking burnt. We tracked all of the problem cases back to one histotech. The histotech was causing the burn artifact with excessive use of freezing spray. From: Arbaugh

RE: [Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-21 Thread Joelle Weaver
When I had this occur recently and sporadically, it was a collection issue. Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC From: lbla...@digestivespecialists.com To: ro...@labcorp.com; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:48:07 -0400 CC: Subject: [Histonet] RE

[Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-21 Thread Podawiltz, Thomas
I had this issue a couple of years back. Found out that there was a delay of over an hour from the time the specimen was collected to the time it was being put into fixative. Tom Tom Podawiltz HT (ASCP) AP Section Head LRGHealthcare -Original Message- From:

[Histonet] RE: Nuclear Artifact

2015-04-21 Thread Blazek, Linda
The first place I would look is to what may be happening before they reach me. If it's only one site with an issue, it sounds more like an issue at collection. Linda -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On