Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-22 Thread Nathan Taylor
]] On Behalf Of Paul Samways Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? I know, but I felt like asking now while the panic is still fresh ;) - Original Message - From: Nathan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-22 Thread botman
Yea, how do change from SDK to SDK because I have a lot of uncommented spagetti code that seems to blend in nicely with the current HalfLife code (there should be a 'highlight changes' button). There is. It's called BeyondCompare... http://www.scootersoftware.com/ ...just compare all the

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-22 Thread Tim Holt
- From: Paul Samways [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 5:44 PM Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? Out of curiosity, how much work are we looking at to get mods moved over to the new SDK. I realise it's a ways off but I presume you can gauge

RE: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Leon Hartwig
]] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 12:40 PM To: HL coders Subject: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? Since there were changes to the interface my guess is that there will be an update to the SDK when 1109 got released. I would like to suggest to base future updates of the SDK on the conversions

RE: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Leon Hartwig
:40 PM To: HL coders Subject: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? Since there were changes to the interface my guess is that there will be an update to the SDK when 1109 got released. I would like to suggest to base future updates of the SDK on the conversions of botman and Will Day which

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Florian Zschocke
Leon Hartwig wrote: As for compilers, I'm already making the changes so both GCC 2.91.66 and GCC 2.95.2 will build the SDK. So, you can look forward to that. I certainly am. Anxiously. :) As for other compilers (MingW and Borland would be the only other likely candidates), that may or

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Paul Samways
) fills me with an 'oh great, another way to fall behind the curve' type feeling ;) - Original Message - From: Leon Hartwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 8:48 PM Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? This is a multi-part message in MIME format

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Nathan Taylor
: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? Out of curiosity, how much work are we looking at to get mods moved over to the new SDK. I realise it's a ways off but I presume you can gauge it in some vague sense. eg. next to none, a whole lot, etc. Just the idea of a new SDK (and one that's been

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Paul Samways
I know, but I felt like asking now while the panic is still fresh ;) - Original Message - From: Nathan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:51 PM Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? You still have till 1.1.1.0 for that. Woah I like

Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Nathan Taylor
: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? I know, but I felt like asking now while the panic is still fresh ;) - Original Message - From: Nathan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:51 PM Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? You still have

RE: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109?

2002-04-21 Thread Philip (Fiber)
Samways Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Updated SDK for 1109? I know, but I felt like asking now while the panic is still fresh ;) - Original Message - From: Nathan Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10