On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:41:02PM +0200, Ronny Schedel wrote:
> the sv_downloadurl is not protected. If I use
> developer 1 on clientside, there is a debug
> message with the full download URL. This needs
> to be fixed. Also banner.gif is requested from
> the webserver, but is never shown clientsi
Ronny Schedel wrote:
Hello,
the sv_downloadurl is not protected.
For this, you can use NoSeeVar:
http://www.100acrebloodbath.com
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view th
Rob wrote:
I also hope that you would agree that sv_downloadurl is a phenomenal asset
for servers wanting to run custom content and also keep players on there
server providing that good .res files are included on the server. This
coupled with a good map vote system keeps our server hopping most of
Hello,
the sv_downloadurl is not protected. If I use
developer 1 on clientside, there is a debug
message with the full download URL. This needs
to be fixed. Also banner.gif is requested from
the webserver, but is never shown clientside.
cu
Ronny
___
To
I had Qwest for 3 years. The only latency issue I had was where a 50ms delay
just hopping into their system.
I consider that to be a huge latency issue. This happens in Seattle also. 50ms
/minimum/ ping to anywhere is outrageous.
The peering issue is even bigger, though, imho.
Admittedly, my measly
try to put metamod and booster_mmon the server..
- Original Message -
From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10:56 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Server FPS 64
It's a well known windows kernal vs motherboard combo issue.
I'll bet device
--
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
OK then.
I did some more checking and ran ResGen on cs_office to verify what you are
saying. You are correct on this one. On the stock maps the overview info is
not included. Frankly this isn't a big problem for us since we have a 1.6
server
- Original Message -
From: "Edge100x" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] [OT]Where to go for bandwidth?
> > qwest offers 896 up and 1.5M down, for $28a month, plus ISP fees, about
> > $50/month.
>
> Trust me, you're not miss
http://www.cyberonic.com/cyb_redirect.cgi?goto=internet_for_home1.html%3
bint_for_home_dsl.shtml
This is a Dsl Company
You can get 6.0 mbps download and 768 Kbps Up load For 59.99
Or 1.5 mbps down and 768 up for 39.99 I wish
I wish I could Get this service OMG it would be great
-Original Me
It's a well known windows kernal vs motherboard combo issue.
I'll bet device manager\computer\shows a different kernel type on each box.
acpi systems have a different default accuracy mmtimer clock in windows for
some reason.
As you noted, certain applications can force the systemtimer to a lower
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi, I´m from brazil, and my english is very poor, but I will try explain.
This is my server.
Motherboard Intel P865 Pearl c/ SATA
CPU Pentium 4 HT 2.6 Ghz
1GB DDR PC3200 400 mhz
VGA ATI Radeon 9800 12
I second that!
I paid cash for Firedaemon. I'd certainly be willing to do the same for
this.
-Original Message-
From: voogru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Hlds_proc B3
I have to say, this tool is very well done, I
Right now Charter is offering 3000 down/256 up for 39.95 a month.Not sure
how good it would be to run a server of of though,not enough bandwidth even
if it was stable at 256.
BeNt
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archiv
I have to say, this tool is very well done, I'm currently using it on my
windows box.
Much better than serverdoc!
Good job.
Do you accept donations? :P
- voogru.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Harwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
14 matches
Mail list logo
