Corey,
Glad to know our tax dolloars are being spent well heh. Seriously
though, no, the webserv shouldnt affect gameplay much at all in that
case, only when someone is connected to it and not much even then
(depending on the amount and size of the stuff you host, of course)
You should be able t
On that note...I have a dual core, dual cpu Opteron 1U sitting next to me
(Tyan GX28 B2881) shipping next week to Equinix in Chicago for game hosting.
OS = Win2k3 Enterprise Server x64. I'll be happy to post results once it's
in colo. As for compatability so far...flawless. Little game I had to pla
I have ran Intel and AMD prefer the AMD for the 64 Bit Processor and looking
to expand to the Dual Core. But just a Preference. As for operating
Systems, Lynux, Unix, AIX, Windows. Each have thier benefits But host Game
on Win X64... Just hate having the Guns and no ammo to drive the 64 Bit
Proc
WOW... talk about the firing line... I host an SRCDS Server on WinX64 no
problems.. all as a hobby. Thank you to those that Came to the call when I
was setting up my HTTP Web Server which is hosted on Lynux.
My best recommendation as a HOBBY... find the platform you are most
comfortable in worki
I have used both IIS and Apache for a couple of years, on both small
do-it-yourself home-brew web pages, and large scale commercial servers. I've
found that if you are having performance problems, switching to/from
apache/IIS isn't likely to make much difference. If you are really serving
enough d
Wait is a script command, who does the waiting depends on who runs the
script. If you run it from your console directly with the "exec" command
then it is relative to your client. If you run "rcon exec script" then
it will run on the remote server (and the wait will be relative to its
FPS).
- Alfr
I don`t think you can do wait server side.. wait is a client-side command...
as far as I know
- Original Message -
From: "Whisper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] How Long is 1 Wait in SRCDS?
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alt
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Sorry, now you have confused the issue
Is it the fps value returned by an stats or rcon stats command?
or
Is it the fps value as defined by fps_max?
The way I interpreted Alfred's explanation, is that it would be based on
actual server fps, wh
Not really. fps_max 30, do 30 waits, and that's 1 second.
- Original Message -
From: "Whisper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] How Long is 1 Wait in SRCDS?
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Makes it a lot more dif
doh, no, slipped my mind. out the door to go do some work right now,
I'll leave myself a note to email Alfred or someone about that when I
get home...
On 8/5/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Makes it a lot more difficult to try to wor
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Makes it a lot more difficult to try to work out how many waits you ought to
have in a script.
BTW, have you found out what the difference between server fps and tickrate
actually means yet?
On 8/6/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd always thought it was a fixed period too, surprised that it's just
until the next frame. Serves its purpose I suppose.
On 8/5/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Thanks Clayton
> I found it too luckily :)
--
Clayton Macleod
_
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks Clayton
I found it too luckily :)
On 8/6/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in case you missed it, it was accidentally in the TFC thread...
>
> The "wait" command delays execution until the next frame. So the
> duration o
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks Alfred
On 8/6/05, Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The "wait" command delays execution until the next frame. So the
> duration of a wait depends upon your frame rate.
>
> - Alfred
>
> Original Message
> From: [EMAIL P
in case you missed it, it was accidentally in the TFC thread...
The "wait" command delays execution until the next frame. So the
duration of a wait depends upon your frame rate.
- Alfred
On 8/5/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Than
:) easy to do. On higher volume sites you find people with http
pipelining switched on and other goodies like that which will
effectively DoS an XP based server, however the TCP level restrictions
for incomplete sockets is far more of a restriction than the version
of IIS itself.
On 8/5/05, Dustin
I have been a professional Tomcat (apache) developer aswell as being
involved in both consultancy and development cycles of some very major
.NET deployments (supported by IIS). Both were large collaborative
projects and both came to fruition.
On 8/5/05, Hemminger Corey SrA 735 CES/CEUD
<[EMAIL PRO
The "wait" command delays execution until the next frame. So the
duration of a wait depends upon your frame rate.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 4:38 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Su
Thank you for the correction, I had forgoten that XP ended up with a
connection limitation.
From: James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Web server
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:36:17 +0100
On 8/5/05, Dustin <[EMAIL
I have used both, but used Linux very little (mostly to teach my self how to
setup web services). Mostly IIS becasue the clients I contact for required a
windows based solution, and the ease of using IIS out wieghts the fight with
the client to switch to Lunix. All fairness aside, what ever the cl
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks anyway
On 8/6/05, Brian M Frain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know they are pretty quick, you can test it yourself by making a
> bind and running additional waits till it is noticable, it takes quit
> a few. I am sorry that isn't exactl
I know they are pretty quick, you can test it yourself by making a
bind and running additional waits till it is noticable, it takes quit
a few. I am sorry that isn't exactly what you are looking for, the
best I can say it you will need around 10-20 before it begins to show.
It's been a few months s
Just curious, but how many people have used both. These fights are
starting to sound like all the other fan boy fights like windows or
Linux, Intel or AMD, NVIDIA or ati. In most of those cases I've found a
lot of people have only used one product for so long that they get
attached and no matter wh
Well I'm In the US Air Force and currently stationed in Ramstein
Germany. I have a DSL connection with 6mbs dl and 786kbs upload and am
working on getting them to bump up my upload speed some more. But I
figured I could run a 16 player server and have just a simple mainly
text based site with only
I dont see why abandoning TFC is such a problem, qwtf is much better. :P
On 8/5/05, Napier, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FF is about as close to it as we'll probably get. BF2 is awesome, hopefully
> the first round of bugs will be gone by the end of the summer. I'd love to
> see a tf2 mo
At times I wonder if this mailing list is more for bitch fests than
explaining and figuring out problems with "HLDS/SCRDS"
Geezit seems at times this list likes to blow up and it always ends up
being a linux vs. unix enviroment.When in the end it ends up being the end
user making the differen
FF is about as close to it as we'll probably get. BF2 is awesome, hopefully
the first round of bugs will be gone by the end of the summer. I'd love to see
a tf2 mod ontop of bf2 though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Newbould
Sent:
What a joke.. There are plenty of multi-million\billion companies running IIS.
James's first response said it best.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Clayton Macleod
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 9:54 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subjec
like I said, both camps claim better performance. You just happen to
be in the IIS camp. There are just as many in the apache camp that
show apache performing better. The fact that you were able to get
better performance out of IIS doesn't necessarily mean anything more
than you have more IIS knowl
On 8/5/05, Hemminger Corey SrA 735 CES/CEUD
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I'm looking at doing this currently as a hobby and a learning
> experience.
No problem.
> I have just started reading into setting up a CSS dedicated
> server, and when a couple of parts that are on order come in I plan
On 8/5/05, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure about the Apache, but I use IIS 6 and 5 for both Windows Server
> 2003 and Windows Server 2000/Windows XP PRO and have had well over 100
> connections at a time. So I don't belive he will have a limitation there.
There are some major limitati
On 8/5/05, Whisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> It amuses me that some people think that there are not people on this list
> who aren't dealing with >100,000 hits a day, and who's web traffic is
> measured in terabytes/month.
Glad you are amu
says you ;)
On 8/5/05, James Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> End of discussion.
--
Clayton Macleod
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
On 8/5/05, Clayton Macleod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, multi-million/multi-billion dollar companies are worried about
> paying for iis, you're right...
Actually, many of them are. The reason is that in fact, it's not just
IIS you buy is it? And you wouldn't want to host off of un-managed
wor
Well I'm looking at doing this currently as a hobby and a learning
experience. I have just started reading into setting up a CSS dedicated
server, and when a couple of parts that are on order come in I plan to
get that running and then from the same box as the CSS server I would
run a Web Server fo
Yeah TF2 will come out just after Duke Nukem Forever
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Macleod
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2005 1:32 p.m.
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] Has VALVe abandoned TFC for good?
but, but, they
- Original Message -
From: "Whisper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It amuses me that some people think that there are not people on this list
who aren't dealing with >100,000 hits a day, and who's web traffic is
measured in terabytes/month.
Yeah no joke.
37 matches
Mail list logo
