Would hardly call you a normal human being. But that's what makes it
interesting.
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: msleeper
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:16:52
To: ; Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing
list
Subject: Re: [hlds
Yes they are. It only took me a couple minutes to rattle it off (big thumbs =
repetitive Deletes...;)
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Cc2iscooL
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:13:04
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Su
Eeew :P
On 4/29/09, Robert Whelan wrote:
> Dingleberries pwn all :p
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Cc2iscooL
> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:13:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Harddrives which to choose
>
> Blackberr
Dingleberries pwn all :p
From: Cc2iscooL
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:13:04 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Harddrives which to choose
Blackberries are easy to type on :)
On 4/29/09, msleeper wrote:
> Did it ta
Blackberries are easy to type on :)
On 4/29/09, msleeper wrote:
> Did it take you an hour to type that on your super awesome mobile
> device?
>
> Sent from my PC like a normal human being
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 02:12 +, xt...@shaw.ca wrote:
>> Bad mathematics there... 500Gb should read
There was already a plugin to workaround this issue, but I had made a
new one before I noticed. You can find mine on the second page of this
thread:
http://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=90791
On the first page is basically the same thing done a different way. Mine
does provide a variabl
Dunno about that, my client machine runs RAID10 with 4 1TB drives:
Intel® Core™ i7-965 Extreme Quad Core w/ HT (8MB, 45nm, 3.2GHz O/C'd to 3.73GHz)
6GB Corsair Dominator Tri-Channel DDR3 at 1066MHZ (3x2GB DIMM)
Intel X58 Extreme DX58SO SLI®-based Motherboard
Dual nVidia® GeForce® GTX 280 – 1024MB
Did it take you an hour to type that on your super awesome mobile
device?
Sent from my PC like a normal human being
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 02:12 +, xt...@shaw.ca wrote:
> Bad mathematics there... 500Gb should read 146GB as end result for mirrored
> (ex146GB) array.
>
>
> Sent from my Blac
Bad mathematics there... 500Gb should read 146GB as end result for mirrored
(ex146GB) array.
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: xt...@shaw.ca
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:18:18
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject:
That's ok sir.
The word usage I had used could have been mistaken for others. What I was
actually defining *Expensive is not in dollars, so to say, but rather the disk
cost ie. RAID1 is a mirrored set so you start out with 2x 146GB disks and end
usable disk capacity is only 500GB. Since RAID1
This is a strange one that I just got:
L 04/29/2009 - 22:43:27: "XBullitt68<310>"
disconnected (reason "Disconnect by user.")
L 04/29/2009 - 22:43:37: World triggered "" (Infected "0") (Survivor "0")
L 04/29/2009 - 22:43:37: Team "Infected" scored "0" with "1" players
L 04/29/2009 - 22:43:37: Team
Rosewill.
Actually the speed we won't notice, since it was IDE... so that explains
most of it I guess.
HDD's are getting cheaper and cheaper.
But i did forget about the cost if the actual hard drives, sorry for rushing
to conclusions.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Cc2iscooL wrote:
> What kin
What kind is it?
On 4/29/09, Jake E wrote:
> Yes. RAID is simple > Go into you're RAID Bios, press the magic "RESTORE"
> Button (that's what it is in my case...)
>
> As for the person who said:
>
> "RAID10 is just too expensive a solution for an app that has small
> writes/read"
>
> I recently bo
Expensive, as in the minumum amount of disks required for a RAID10 array and
expensive as in the end disk capacity. I would not touch and RAID card that
was $10 as it is, more than likey, gonna fail on rebuild, impact your server
performance as it is offloading all commands to system processors
Indeed. Unplug drive, plug in drive. Drive rebuilds from exisiting
parity/mirror. All of 10 seconds if your slow...;)
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: msleeper
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:08:47
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 serve
Yes. RAID is simple > Go into you're RAID Bios, press the magic "RESTORE"
Button (that's what it is in my case...)
As for the person who said:
"RAID10 is just too expensive a solution for an app that has small
writes/read"
I recently bought a RAID Card for my dad's corp (for the machine that pol
Depends on the controller really. Some are as easy as putting in the
new hdd and hitting a button, but they're expensive.
On 4/29/09, msleeper wrote:
> Right because restoring from RAID is a walk in the park.
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:00 -0500, Cc2iscooL wrote:
>> But that's too much work fo
We've released the online tool at
http://www.specialattack.net/spa_tf2_game_menu_generator
Please notice it's still in development and suggestions are welcome. One
of the things we're still going to add is the option to remember your
profile.
Cheers,
P.s. Read the little manual posted with it an
Right because restoring from RAID is a walk in the park.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 18:00 -0500, Cc2iscooL wrote:
> But that's too much work for us lazy server admins.
>
> On 4/29/09, msleeper wrote:
> > Yeah I have to agree, this whole RAID thing is a bit overkill. Your hard
> > drive dies? Pay you
But that's too much work for us lazy server admins.
On 4/29/09, msleeper wrote:
> Yeah I have to agree, this whole RAID thing is a bit overkill. Your hard
> drive dies? Pay your host the $20 to replace your drive and re-install.
> It's a game server, it will take like 30 minutes.
>
> On Wed, 2009
From a quick look at it, it seems very possible. As I understand it,
once it reaches the set time (default is 5 AM), it checks every 5
minutes to see if the server is ready (ie. empty or filled with bots) to
restart. The way its set up, most of the code is already there; you
might need a varia
This may be a symptom of the problem, but I notice (as of right now) two of
our populated servers are reporting 3/4 players (numplayers = 2, maxplayers
= 4) through a query response.
However, the player list portion of the query response lists (confrication,
Zoey, Louis, Raven) - There's two bot n
I think they finally learnt - that's why there's now a CS1.6 beta
-Original Message-
From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Munra
Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2009 7:56 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re
It sounded to me that they genuinely didn't know about this bug at all until
a couple days ago. He stated that they hadn't found this bug in their
testing, and had asked us for server logs showing the servers going into
this "bot hibernation" state.
Aaron Rapp
-Original Message-
From: h
And here we go. It's the TF2 mapchange bug all over again! Where's Karl?
These kids need some schooling on how to properly repeat the same
problem daily.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:56 -0400, Munra wrote:
> It be nicer If they did some testing before releasing Don't you think?
>
> - Original Me
It be nicer If they did some testing before releasing Don't you think?
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Rapp"
To: "'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list'"
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] L4D bots after hibernation
>I know this is being looked int
I'm a bit of a noob with sourcemod plugins, is it possible to modify this to
check every five minutes:
https://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=87291
and change map, not restart?
This would fix this issue (well kinda...)
Cheers, Phil
___
To unsubs
I know this is being looked into at Valve. There's no ETA yet, though.
They've procured some server logs from a couple people on the list.
Aaron Rapp
-Original Message-
From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Cc2iscooL
Sent: W
Agreed. I took Sourcemod off my servers because I thought it might have been
causing issues.
Even on vanilla servers it does this.
Fix pl0x.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Johan Andersson wrote:
> Bumping this issue to the top because it's very annoying.
>
> It happens every few hours now.
>
Bumping this issue to the top because it's very annoying.
It happens every few hours now.
--
From: "-xL-Trinidad"
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:31 PM
To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list"
Subject: Re: [hlds] L4D bots after hiberna
Yeah I have to agree, this whole RAID thing is a bit overkill. Your hard
drive dies? Pay your host the $20 to replace your drive and re-install.
It's a game server, it will take like 30 minutes.
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 06:51 -0700, Robert Whelan wrote:
> Its a game server...lol 10K SAS 146GB would d
Its a game server...lol 10K SAS 146GB would do you fine. Otherwise a WD Black
I have 13 servers easily running off ours (Dual Xeon 5335 Quad Core Clovertown
Processors)
Create an Image, you can always upgrade if needed...
From: "xt...@shaw.ca"
To: xt...@shaw.
Ack, replying to my reply, it seems I went off on a different tnagent than what
was asked.
You have a fairly *beefy server. I would not make the disk subsystem the choke
point for future growth. I would also not go overboard with disks or expensive
RAID sets. I would recommend 10K SAS (146/3
IMO, RAID1 would be sufficient especially with the IOPs current SAS/SCSI or
even SATA drives provide. If RAID5 is required for critical uptime then I
would go as far as to suggest RAID6 just because of the shorter rebuild time
and higher success rate for rebuilds as there are 2 parity stripes t
Is there really any reason to use expensive setups when it comes to
storage? The harddrive is barley used at all except when the server
change level but the clients have to do that as well so it's not like
they have to wait for the server, the server will be finished in time
even with an average co
What happened to RAID 6?
Noone liked those $3,000 controllers?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Yaakov Smith wrote:
> That's the beauty of RAID5 - you're only in trouble if 2 HDDs fail at once.
> If you're worried about that, then that's what RAID10 is for.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
36 matches
Mail list logo
