K. Mike Bradley
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Dave I know peeps here will hate me for continuing on with this but this is
a forum for issues like this and I must make a point.
A Dual Xeon (which is a Pentium 3) does not
Is this debate still going on? Geez.
Adam
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
pff, what does this "Shane Robinett" guy know anyway. Not like he hosts a
major server company or knows much about computers anyway. He's probably
balding for that matter.
-coldfusioN
>From: "Shane Robinett&qu
I stand corrected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald Holl
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
To my knowledge all the new Dual Xeons have HyperThreading.
I
True, P4 is a radical new core.
Hey this is all good discussion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 1:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
For
Nope, Agent BeNT has a link to Intel.
I guess Intel must have made a new core for the latest P3 Xeon's.
Show how out of touch I am ... I can't keep up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mark duffy
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [
Ok enough... Time for the THWACK Stick!
__
*--- |__| \ /\ / /_\ | |/ |*
| | | \/ \/ / \ |__ |\ |
o
>
__
*--- |__| \ /\ / /_\ |
products/server/processors/server/xeon/index.htm?ii
d=ipp_srvr_proc+xeon512kb&
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 1:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or
e.
omfg I can't believe this discussion is still going on.
-Original Message-
From: Shane Robinett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Mike - if you are going to make up stuff, atle
> >From: "Shane Robinett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 14:18:25 -0400
> >
> >Mike - if you are going to make up stuf
p/processors/pentium4HTXE/
Info about XEON =
http://www.intel.com/products/server/processors/server/xeon/
- Original Message -
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or
/xeon/
- Original Message -
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> To my knowledge all the new Dual Xeons have HyperThreading.
> I have multipl
I run a dual xeon box and it has htand a xeon is a xeon.This
link is from intel's website,imagine that I found some information on a
chipset I'm wondering about off the internet!(Note the sarcasim)And from
the makers website.Wow this internet thing is great!!
http://www.intel.com/products/s
To my knowledge all the new Dual Xeons have HyperThreading.
I have multiple Dual Xeon servers to prove it.
- Original Message -
From: "K. Mike Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Window
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: 03 July 2004 16:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Dave I know peeps here will hate me for continuing on with this but this is
a forum for issues like this and I must make a point.
A Dual Xeon (which is a Penti
D] On Behalf Of David Fencik
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
I'd like to add that I have said that hlds is not multi-threaded, which is,
in fact, false. It is not coded in a way to take advantage of
hyperthreading, ho
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
You clearly dont understand how HT works. Here's a brief overview:
HT makes a single CP
rver would run better on a single
proc system with hyperthreading enabled, but don't have the means or
desire to test.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
You clearly dont understand how HT works. Here's a brief overview:
HT makes a single CPU core look like two CPU's it does this so that
the OS can schedule additional tasks on the second "virtual" CPU
and hence make use of potentially idle execution units in the
"physical" CPU.
The problem comes fr
;t talking about MPing results anyway, he was talking about HTing, which
does not help hlds at all.
-Original Message-
From: K. Mike Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
I am going t
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Actually although the game engine starts 4 threads the core engine ISN'T
multi-threaded and it highly depends on your setup if HT will help. We've
benchmarked it having a detrimental effect in some situations, so please
c
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Dude We covered that and it IS multi threaded, (i.e.: there IS more
than on thread) plus there are also operating system threads as well.
I don't know that much about HT but I do know that being able to r
Actually although the game engine starts 4 threads the core engine
ISN'T multi-threaded and it highly depends on your setup if HT will
help. We've benchmarked it having a detrimental effect in some
situations, so please check your facts before spouting off on one :P
Steve / K
- Original Me
QED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fencik
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Hlds is NOT multithreaded and there is NO benefit from running HT with it.
I don't joke. It lags a bit, and is steady though. I'll tar an example kit
for you guys.
- Original Message -
From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Window
Check out this FPS
http://www.jointopsthegame.com/default.asp
It bosts of 150 player servers for the retail and a 100 player server for the
demo version.
Quoting "Darren J. Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have always been in favor of huge maps and tons of players. I think
> Battlefield 1942 has
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If this is true it really could change the face of it. Imagine running huge
game, with each server running a portion of the map. You could have a map
like Manhattan, or Hollywood with hundreds of players. I know crazy
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Harwood
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
The game is essentially single threaded, multiple processors/hyperthreading
will have minimal
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Harwood
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
No, it will share the work between the virtual CPUs, which in theory will be
slightly slower than using a single CPU but most likely un
! LOL
Mike ParaDOX Munoz
www.paradisesgarage.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If this is true it really could change the face of it. Imagine ru
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
LOL.. you are joking right?
-Original Message-
From: James Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
LOL.. you are joking right?
-Original Message-
From: James Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
I got a hlds server to work through distributed computing via linux.
- Original
I got a hlds server to work through distributed computing via linux.
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Harwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> No, it will s
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fencik
Sent: 24 June 2004 20:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Let me offer a better example. If you have hyperthreading on, hlds will
be restricted to using
hyperthreading.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
It doesn't always work out that way was
Really it doesn't help. Trust me on this one.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Dave,
When your HLD
It doesn't always work out that way was my simple point.
-Original Message-
From: K. Mike Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If you have two processors then two thread
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: 24 June 2004 18:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If you have two processors then two threads can simultaneously run ...
One
OS and one APP thread.
It's mo better
Same I think with HT in
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Last I looked there were 5 on both my boxes.
(that's with a bunch of addons loaded as well which might account for the
other 2, I've never seen the thead count higher then 5 though. But simply
having 5 t
TECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: 24 June 2004 17:36
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Last I looked there were 5 on both my boxes.
(that's with a bunch of addons loaded as well which might account for
the
other 2, I've never seen
MP or HT neccessarly.)
-Original Message-
From: K. Mike Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Dave,
When your HLDS.exe is running,
Get a process viewer and you will see more tha
or so) and HT would
still help any box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fencik
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Hlds is NOT multithreaded and there is NO
Hlds is NOT multithreaded and there is NO benefit from running HT with
it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003
Original Message -
> From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:07 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
>
>
> > Yes service pack 4 did address as I recall one tiny issue with HT.
&g
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> Yes service pack 4 did address as I recall one tiny issue with HT.
> win2k however does not take advantage of HT reguardless. I think someone
> mentioned that it didn't &#
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Napier, Kevin
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 12:07 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Yes service pack 4 did address as I recall one tiny issue with HT.
win2k however does n
f Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Intel says to disable HT if u run w2k. There are know issues. The code
IS
not optimized for HT ... HT did not exist when w2k was written.
I had problems with my new de
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Intel says to disable HT if u run w2k. There are know issues. The code
IS
not optimized for HT ... HT did not exist when w2k was written.
I had problems with my new dell server running w2k and Dell told me to
disable
> > as for whoever said xp for win servers, i would like u to send me some
of
> > that fine jamacian weed you're smoking, cuz im out at the moment.
> You have no clue what you are talking about, get your knowledge to a
reasonable level, and point out
> the facts on which you build your above state
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
In Greg's post it didn't state if Win2kPro supported HT. Does it?
- Original Message -
From: "[YG]Sharza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
In Greg's post it didn't state if Win2kPro supported HT. Does it?
- Original Message -
From: "[YG]Sharza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: SV: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> > nope, 2k does not support hyperthreading
> Yes
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jules (aka
Buddha-Pest)
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Re: Windows 2003 and seat requirements? [was Re: [hlds]
Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?]
"Benjamin "Woodie" de Bos" <[EMAIL PROTE
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jules (aka
Buddha-Pest)
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows 2003 and seat requirements? [was Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or
Windows 2003?]
"Z Teknology HLDS Email&quo
hlds
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Re: Windows 2003 and seat requirements? [was Re: [hlds]
Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?]
> "Benjamin "Woodie" de Bos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks much :)
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "K. Mike Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> After you turn off all the crap that comes with 2000 or 200
"Benjamin "Woodie" de Bos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| that means Per seat licensing
|
| So you have 5 seats to connect in active directory state
|
| nothing to do with processes...
yes, i understand that it's nothing to do with processes :) i meant, how
many con
Message -
From: "Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mirror.valve.hlds
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Windows 2003 and seat requirements? [was Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or
Windows 2003?]
> "Z Teknology
"Z Teknology HLDS Email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Anybody have experience hosting with win2k or win2k3 and see any big
| differences? Going to run 3-4 CS servers on it and a 7 person personal
| ventrilo...CPU isn't an issue, just which OS is better, any thought
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roc
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If cost is NOT an issue would 2003 then be the way to go?
I'm asking because I was going to try 2003 and now want to be sure to I'm
makin
PS: from my last post:
Of course if you have a P4 and 2003, HT would only improve things.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003
end, so a reinstall gives you another 6 months.
- Original Message -
From: "Roc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> Thank you Sir
>
> Regards
> - Original M
Thank you Sir
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> 2000 vs 2003 if cost is a non issue use 2003.
> As for hlds
sday, June 15, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> 2000 vs 2003 if cost is a non issue use 2003.
> As for hlds it really makes very little difference.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 20
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> I think you mean 'making it expensive..' not useless.
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multi
2000 vs 2003 if cost is a non issue use 2003.
As for hlds it really makes very little difference.
-Original Message-
From: Roc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
If cost is NOT an issue
ent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> I think you mean 'making it expensive..' not useless.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Hartland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:07 AM
&
I think you mean 'making it expensive..' not useless.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Hartland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Not true as far as I know it isn't hyp
blem built in with 2k.)
Hope this helps alittle more.
BeNt
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Not true as far as I know it is
Not true as far as I know it isn't hyperthread "aware" but that doesn't
stop u using it. The difference is that the scheduler it will treat the logical
CPU's as real CPU's and as we all know this isn't the case.
The result is that it "may" not extract as good as performance as
a hyperthread aware O
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Wow, thought 2k did support HT. Is there gonna be anyproblems if i have a HT
support processor and m
Perhaps it's http://www.proshostudios.com/ from his email address.
- Original Message -
From: "Guido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 08:57 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> Greg, thanks. Nice
I've hosted with Win2000 for a few years, and never once had any problems.
Win2003 represents an unknown, and for that reason I'd stick with Win2000
unless you have time to play with it. At my last job they converted a few
boxes from Win2000 to Win2003, and started having performance problems with
Greg, thanks. Nice company there, you have a site?
- Original Message -
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:40 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> First off,
>
> I run a network of
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guido
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
Wow, thought 2k did support HT. Is there gonna be anyproblems if i have a HT
support processor and motherboard but no
Wow, thought 2k did support HT. Is there gonna be anyproblems if i have a HT
support processor and motherboard but not the OS?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or
The leased server route frees you up of having to buy the os. I know we're
going with 2k3 64 (or were I should say till recent news from VALVe about
win64 hlds not being even a thought at this point), through the planet,
there is no license to buy. Now we're looking at suse or *nix though, since
am
like u to send me some of
that fine jamacian weed you're smoking, cuz im out at the moment.
- Original Message -
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> Wait. Does Win2k Pro support HT?
I doubt it. HT wasn't around when Windows 2000 came out so it would seem to make sense
that Windows 2003 can take advantage of HT and therefore perform better.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view th
Wait. Does Win2k Pro support HT?
- Original Message -
From: "[YG]Sharza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: SV: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> > ok again im gonna say go with 2000 because newer windows these days lake
> > actua
ok again im gonna say go with 2000 because newer windows these days lake
actual cpu and memory to run as where 2000 is so old but still good it
really needs nothing hence server has more to use
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> I've run both with a dual xeon with ht and to tell you the truth I saw no
> difference in the two as far as hlds is concerned.But I would go with
etwork like" I
don't see how as 2k3 is basically the same thing with newer version of the
same software.(ie: IIS,DNS,POP3,ect,ect)
BeNt
- Original Message -
From: "Z Teknology HLDS Email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
ive used both and honestly, i saw 0 difference.
2k3 supports hyperthreading tho, so if ur cpu supports it, id go with 2k3.
otherwise ones
ive used both and honestly, i saw 0 difference.
2k3 supports hyperthreading tho, so if ur cpu supports it, id go with 2k3.
otherwise ones about as good of a choice as the other.
- Original Message -
From: "Z Teknology HLDS Email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday,
If there is no monthly price difference go with 2003.
> me myself iv used 2000 its more network-like and runs smoth on all cpu's so
> im gonna say go for 2000
What is "more network-like"?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
me myself iv used 2000 its more network-like and runs smoth on all cpu's so
im gonna say go for 2000
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
86 matches
Mail list logo
