ok cool - how would you compare this plugin vs. -pingboost 1 or 3 ?
Please dont beat me up if this has already been answered :P
Pro's / Con's ?
Reason I ask - I am forced to use -pingboost 1 on CPU's with 128k Cache and
256k Cache- the 512k cache CPU's scream and dont require any pingboosting
Yes,
It works with Cheating Death and in VAC secure mode.
Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:
Does it work with the server being secure?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.co
Does it work with the server being secure?
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Judge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: -pingboost 3 and low sys_ticrate RE: [hlds_linux] Re: The best
OS for the server debian/freebsd
> I am still
I am still using HLDSPingBooster, and it seems to be working fine under
both 1.5 and 1.6 (I forgot to remove it from my startup script).
The link is http://www.udpsoft.com/booster/
Your mileage may vary.
My stats are at: http://www.axia.org.uk/cstats/
That's retarded. Has Valve made any statement on this?
James Sykes wrote:
HLTV will run - but only connect to the same class C as the
games-servers.
Eg hltv -1.1.1.10 > hlds - 1.1.1.20 and not 2.2.2.2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jus
Are they connecting to servers on the same subnet, or to remote servers?
DLinkOZ wrote:
I have multiple HLTV servers running on one box, no changes were made from
pre-STEAM configurations. Just updated them from 3.1.1.0 to current and off
they went.
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mit
HLTV will run - but only connect to the same class C as the
games-servers.
Eg hltv -1.1.1.10 > hlds - 1.1.1.20 and not 2.2.2.2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Mitchell
Sent: 13 October 2003 01:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hl
I have multiple HLTV servers running on one box, no changes were made from
pre-STEAM configurations. Just updated them from 3.1.1.0 to current and off
they went.
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:50 P
Yo. Has anybody found a way to get hltv to run over the internet? From
what I can tell (and from looking at old posts), hltv will only run on a
LAN. That's ridiculous, especially for us hosting companies.
Justin
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list prefere
/quote Britt Priddy (PZGN)/end quote
> When I use pingboost 1 or pingboost 3 on a P4 1.7ghz - 1gig ddram - I see
> alot of choke -
For me choke was almost all client-side. If you make changes on the fly
in game you can really see dramatic changes in connection quality by
messing with the various
/quote Daniel Stroven/end quote
> BP
>
> What did you change on your servers?
No flames, I'm always ready to be reasonable when a serious discussion is
at hand :)
The difference is all in -pingboost 3. It's been on and off semi-randomly
in an attempt to see if anybody actually noticed. I see so
Does anyone have a method of converting a war3users.ini file to a .sql file
so I can import all of my users?
Mike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hl
Here is what found...
"cl_updaterate 20 Ranged 10-101
Number of updates client will request from the server each second. In
general, the more players in the game, the lower this should be. If you are
getting choke, lower this value until you have none.
cl_cmdrate 30 Ranged 10-101
Number of times p
Do you have any 'base line' suggestions for adjusting the rate /
cl_updaterate / cl_cmdrate ? next to the defaults?
Thanks J!
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: -pingboost 3 and low sys_ticrate RE: [h
You see choke because your server is outperforming your client. Choke IS NOT
a bad thing. Just adjust your rates to your client only recieves the number
of updates it can handle.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Britt
Priddy (PZGN)
Sent
When I use pingboost 1 or pingboost 3 on a P4 1.7ghz - 1gig ddram - I see
alot of choke - with one 20 player server running - CPU has 256k cache - I
do not see this or need pingboost on CPU's using 512k cache nor on Intel
Celerons 1.7ghz having 128k cache (using Pingboost 1) - no choke occurs...
Us
BP
What did you change on your servers? Looks to me like you started testing
higher hz kernels. In game pings on your servers have been drastically
reduced...like you would see going from 100hz to higher hz kernel.
Previous pings in game on your servers were 80-100 with spikes above that.
In th
17 matches
Mail list logo
