Saint K, you are a Saint ^^
Thanks much!!
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
We've released the online tool at
http://www.specialattack.net/spa_tf2_game_menu_generator
Please notice it's still in development and suggestions are welcome. One
of the things we're still going to add is the option to remember your
profile.
Cheers,
P.s. Read the little manual posted with it an
We've released the online tool at
http://www.specialattack.net/spa_tf2_game_menu_generator
Please notice it's still in development and suggestions are welcome. One
of the things we're still going to add is the option to remember your
profile.
Cheers,
P.s. Read the little manual posted with it an
I've been running 4 tf2 servers and a few l4d servers on previous gen
opterons (2220 and similar). I haven't been impressed compared to the
same gen xeons. We're lucky to get a full 24 slot server per core
without noticing problems. 32 slot is not possible. Centos 5,FYI
Been very happy w
>From my personal experience Intel processors (especially the C2D/Q's) run a
lot better than the Opterons in terms of performance.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:41 PM, David A. Parker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Sorry about the bump...)
>
> Asking about the X4200 was probably too specific. Can anyone comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
I actually am running it on an X2200 M2 running Ubuntu Server 8.04. Dual quad
Opterons running ESX Server, besides (for some Windoze guests). It runs well.
Bill
David A. Parker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Sorry about the bump...)
>
> Asking about the
Hi,
(Sorry about the bump...)
Asking about the X4200 was probably too specific. Can anyone comment on
running HLD/SRCDS on the AMD Opteron platform in general? Any
performance issues, pros or cons, etc.?
Thanks,
Dave
David A. Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone h
On 29.04.2009 20:28, Barny wrote:
> To be honest (considering that I'm neither
> a Linux, nor a HLDS expert), for me it seems that L4D/HLDS will consume
> all the resources quickly what you provide to it, although it can
> operate very nice with moderate hardware like as I described above.
>
I
I use one virtual L4D server (Xen, Linux as both the host and guest OS),
which mainly operates in campaign mode, so serves up to 4 players. The
host machine is an old IBM server with dual 1.3GHz P3 CPU (Coppermine)
and a RAID5 array with SCSI disks, 3 units. The virtual (guest) machine
has the
Good point. I don't want to find myself in need of a better server in
6-month so a year even. I'd like to be able to leave this server
running for quite a long time.
Would I maybe be better off getting a machine like I listed to JUST run
TF2 (1 game) and then another same or even with less pow
Are we talking about a multi-core like Dual Core or Quad Core? I am
trying to watch how much I spend, but I don't want to spend too little
and get screwed in a few months or a year. Right now my group only
plays L4D (some of us have been playing TF2 for a long time), but we are
slowly getting
Assuming you're talking about the old single core Xeons here, but
depending on the player slots on TF2, but a machine with those specs
really won't be up to scratch at all. To give you an indication,
anything over 16 players on a TF2 server running on a 3.4Ghz Xeon causes
noticeable in-game pe
I have a dual xeon 3ghz, which runs 6 l4d's forked. if its really busy, it
could hold up to 3/4 vs games with 8 players, and the others filled with
4.. at that point i see it sometimes hit 0% idle, maybe you could do more
and i have a bad setup.. but anything more then that will show ingame..
So s
13 matches
Mail list logo
