> so know i can go back to my first feeling... that is yours, nathan.
> i thought exactly what you said (windows forwarding broadcast packets, and
> linux not), then was very disappointed about the all-seeing-eye "finding"
> (displaying) my lan server.
Yep. This question comes up all the time; I
> regardless, my comments on how Linux
> broadcast packets work are correct.
(unless recent 2.4 releases have fixed it; I havent upgraded)
Regards
Nathan
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://
>
> explain to me
>
> :-P
>
> -- djeyl
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nathan O'Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 9:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Linux broadcast packets
>
&g
Most of that's wrong; so just to set the record straight --
The linux kernel does not pass received broadcast packets to applications
bound to a particular interface. Windows does. Hence, servers with a
specified IP running under windows will show up in the the game browser, but
those running u
> And why do you think that it is
> all about the Admins and not about the players?
/me hands over a cluepon
Allowing administrators to configure daemons to their liking is just good
etiquette; particularly if you want those administrators to use your
software.
In regards to your silly comment,
I dont see why you need to be a lawyer to discuss legal issues. We
obviously arent giving legal advice, just discussing the law as we
understand. The only reason I can see to complain about that is if the
people doing so have absolutely no understanding of the law
Regards
Nathan
- Original
> Wouldn't they be stuck, though, if OfficeXP already works on OSX? I'm
> not a programmer, but I do see your point. Quick question: if an app
> works in OSX on the current hardware, does that app have to be
> completely rewritten for a different hardware platform even though it's
> still runing
7 matches
Mail list logo
