On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:40:07AM -0500, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
James Clark wrote:
3110b here.
Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?
Probably =P (game cstrike) (version 46/3.1.1.0/2147)
What ever that is? It's been ages since I did the last update - just
sitting tight till one point six, man
[EMAIL PROTECTED] previously said:
Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking
with the 3110beta ? I've been watching and see different opinions and
info posted regarding the differences and it seems that CPU usage is
still a concern regarding these new releases. Is
Scott Pettit wrote:
I'm running 3111c1. The way I see it is that we just have to move on
with the times and realise that games and the way they run changes.
We don't *have* to yet, thankfully. 3110c still works and is currently
the best choice :\ I can only hope that HL2's server will be
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Britt wrote:
Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking with the
3110beta ?
I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted regarding the
differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a concern regarding these
James Clark wrote:
3110b here.
Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
On Monday, June 16, 2003 4:59 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Britt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking
with the 3110beta ?
I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted
regarding the differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a
6 matches
Mail list logo
