Re: [hlds_linux] Re: HLDS vs SRCDS bandwidth usage (e-Plutonia)

2005-07-07 Thread e-Plutonia
Oh my, just a quick recap, how many snapshots / second on HLDS again? i've not slept for a while as some might be able to tell =( On 7/7/05, e-Plutonia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tickrate 33 > 100 does not entirely fix it. > > On 7/7/05, devin812 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Message: 1 > > >

Re: [hlds_linux] Re: HLDS vs SRCDS bandwidth usage (e-Plutonia)

2005-07-07 Thread e-Plutonia
tickrate 33 > 100 does not entirely fix it. On 7/7/05, devin812 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Message: 1 > > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:01:30 -0700 > > From: e-Plutonia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > > Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS vs SRCDS bandwidth usage > > Reply-To

[hlds_linux] Re: HLDS vs SRCDS bandwidth usage (e-Plutonia)

2005-07-07 Thread devin812
> Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:01:30 -0700 > From: e-Plutonia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS vs SRCDS bandwidth usage > Reply-To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > Another thing is, SRCDS seems to have some sort of a bug in which