Eric (Deacon) wrote:
As far as Outlook and swiss cheese, I've never fallen prey to any...ANY
.vbs or other types/instances of virii, worms, malicious code, etc.
Perhaps I'm just a smart user that way, or perhaps I'm the luckiest guy
in the world (I'll argue against that, heh), but...
Most
The biggest problem is that most users are not and the preconfig that
comes with M$ software is even worse then a Redhat installation :D
It's costing companies and everyday users a lot of agony and money
every
year, that M$ is so negligent in general with security :(
You shouldn't have to
Well, I have barely used OE, but i think you mean Outlook has more
features for message filtering, not more robust. I routinely have to
manually move HLDS messages into the folder I have set up for them
because the filter doesn't work.
Then there's something wrong with the filter. I've
Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg wrote:
I doubt you would want e-mail client advice from me, I use pine from
commandline ffs...
Isn't being insuccecptable from any .vbs viruses nice? :)
And what would a .vbs virus do in Mozilla mail???
--
/Stefan
Software never has bugs. It just develops random
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
so tell me what some good clients are and why. i just switched from
outlook to mozilla.
Ouch...I've never heard one review or even one individual say anything
good about mozilla's email client other than it sometimes works.
Been working for me for more then 2 years
Well, even if a luser executed it, as long as it was in a windows
enviorment, it would still execute, granted, being *nix/*bsd'ish, it would
be ineffective anyways.
I should have clairified
Thanks
-a-
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Stefan Huszics wrote:
Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg wrote:
I doubt you
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Then there's something wrong with the filter. I've never had that
problem. 100% of emails from this list head into my HLDS Linux
folder. This is how I have my filter set up:
http://www.firekite.com/store/filter.gif I'm interested to see really
what the problem is.
Wouldn't use a M$ mailclient unless someone payed me to do it. Most of
their software looks mostly like swiss chease regarding security
aspects.
Next you're going to tell me that an insecure linux box (RedHat,
anyone?) isn't a hacker's playground...
It's up to the system's administrator to
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, m0gely wrote:
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, m0gely (apparantly) wrote (but eric snipped it):
so tell me what some good clients are and why. i just switched from
outlook to mozilla.
Pine of course..
Ouch...I've never heard one review or even one
Eric (Deacon) writes:
Not ALL Microsoft products are bad or evil. Some are poorly written
hacks. Some are great.
Of course M$ has some best-of-breed software. Anytime something better peeks
over the horizon, M$ buys them up and shuts them down. That's how the
monopoly is maintained. The
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Brian A. Stumm wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
so far i have had no problems. it seams to be really fast, and has
features to be very competetive with outlook interms of what i use.
basically for pop3 email and a good address book.
So when
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Mad Scientist wrote:
Eric (Deacon) writes:
Not ALL Microsoft products are bad or evil. Some are poorly written
hacks. Some are great.
Of course M$ has some best-of-breed software. Anytime something better peeks
over the horizon, M$ buys them up and shuts them
There is a difference between them! LookOut express (free) has good
handling of the filtering of email. LookOut (pay for) is crap at it.
Heh...when was the last time you used either of these products? When
was the last time you tried to make up some supposedly clever
bastardization of a linux
Isn't that what media player 9 is supposed to do to real?
MP9 is the first thing I've ever seen that makes me want RealPlayer
more. RealPlayer sucks absolute ass. It's horrible as a standard and
worse as an application. It takes over your computer whether you want
it to or not, digs deep in
14 matches
Mail list logo
