I also know how
much I dislike it like when helpdesk staff give out my email
address or email addresses of others in the NOC to users, who
end up emailing me with problems that are not my department to
answer.
Hoo boy, man...I tell you what, I'm right with you on that one. There
are times
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 10:49, Rene Luckow wrote:
I haven't tried about VAC, but I have written eric a couple of times, and git
answers within a day... dunno with VAC though
I'll agree to the extend that the normal cs(l)user has no idea what VAC is,
and how it works, ppl still mail me to
Hi there -
Up till now I have banned players that VAC detects, no questions
asked... as it is usually someone with an obviously moronic name and/or
behavior. Recently a regular player and admin was detected and banned
for 24 hours by VAC.
Assuming of course he is the innocent guy I perceive him
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 22:12, Mike Guadagnino wrote:
Hi there -
Up till now I have banned players that VAC detects, no questions
asked... as it is usually someone with an obviously moronic name and/or
behavior. Recently a regular player and admin was detected and banned
for 24 hours
Unfortunately this is the ONLY thing that has not been discussed so far,
forgive me if I disagree.
Nobody said a WORD about possible causes for illegitimate ban, nobody
STATED for how long bans last (ok, there was ONE person who said that, but
we need confirmation) and there was NOTHING
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:41:16PM +0100, Rene Luckow wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 22:12, Mike Guadagnino wrote:
Hi there -
Up till now I have banned players that VAC detects, no questions
asked... as it is usually someone with an obviously moronic name and/or
behavior. Recently
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:18, James Clark wrote:
Doesn't mean it can't be discussed again =)
Get him to remove and reinstall CS, that should fix it. He's got
24hrs to do something other than play the game.
This is the problem as I see it though. why should he have to stop
playing for 24
Thank you.
Before posting I read through the archives (several months of them!),
at least as much as I could before concluding that even if there were
discussions relating to my questions, it might be beneficial for a
really good overview.
Additionally, I think it would great to hear from those
Mike Guadagnino wrote:
Thank you.
Before posting I read through the archives (several months of them!),
Is there a way to search the archives? Rather than to just surf
through them? A search feature would be just grand.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:35:45PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:18, James Clark wrote:
Doesn't mean it can't be discussed again =)
Get him to remove and reinstall CS, that should fix it. He's got
24hrs to do something other than play the game.
This is the
nobody STATED for how long bans last
Yes. Eric did.
(ok, there was ONE person who said that, but we need confirmation)
and there was NOTHING conclusive about it
Eric, IMO would be a trust worthy source...
Maybe a lot of topics mentioning VAC, but very little VAC-related.
If you haven't
You HAVE to be kidding... Everybody complaining about something is
definitely NOT doing something about it.
Except for pressure which does not seem do be working very well, since we
haven't heard a word from VALVe, so far. But that's their natural position;
Collect data from our feedback and
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 13:27, James Clark wrote:
nobody STATED for how long bans last
Yes. Eric did.
A search of the archives brings up this dated Oct 8th
We'll make sure that anyone who was falsely detected during this period
isn't banned from secure servers for 24 hours.
Thats the only
Get him to remove and reinstall CS, that should fix it. He's got
24hrs to do something other than play the game.
This is the problem as I see it though. why should he have to
stop playing for 24 hours because of something not his fault.
Why? Because the system is not perfect. The system
clan wars
were out of commission. This is an issue that needs to be addressed.
-Original Message-
From: Capriotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC detections
You HAVE to be kidding... Everybody
to compare:
http://stats.clanlynx.org/cheaters.php
-Original Message-
From: Destroyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] VAC detections
I am wondering if this sudden increase in vac detections
16 matches
Mail list logo
