joe_null wrote:
Would you please explain that from a thorough and factual basis that I
can understand?
Nom matter how rudimentarily done, is that even possible? ;)
Yes, it is. Quite so :P
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list pre
deacon wrote:
>>Would you please explain that from a thorough and factual basis that I
>>can understand?
Nom matter how rudimentarily done, is that even possible? ;)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit
Simon Garner wrote:
The only problem will be where to get the CPU usage data from. To make
the results really meaningful we need to have people posting numbers
from older versions of HLDS (3.1.1.0) as well for comparison
What does legacy software have to do with it? We're faced with the
current ve
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 0x2e
->Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:52 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: RE:[OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
.
->
->As a side note, try renicing
lol - ok then...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:29 AM
Subject: RE: RE:[OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> >Our issues arised after seeing hlds 3111d on Intel vs. the AMD
* Simon Garner [2003-09-24 18:06]:
>
> I wouldn't expect to see Valve fix it until somebody can pinpoint that
> the problem is reproducable and quantifiable on X hardware with Y
> configuration running Z version of HLDS with ABC options. As long as we
> keep sending mixed messages to them, they wo
1 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> PS - one last thing all you small time server admins (like myself) out
there
> making all your money off cs servers. 3 words. Class Action Lawsuit. If my
> business fails because of this and I cant find customers qu
>Dust2
You should try this on Aztec or similar map because it's the one causing the
issues, that and airstrip.
Jeremy
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listi
-
From: "James Sykes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> Ignore the last mail - clicked send by accident!
>
> >I would appreciate feedback a
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> Same here on the CPU usage - we've had no complaints yet.
>
> Britt
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kevin J. Anders
this stats output for a default rh9 install on a dual xeon 2ghz with 1.5
gb of ram.
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
48.50 37.65 45.28 40 106 49.84 17
map is aztec
jake
Matthew Donnon wrote:
Alfred: All the testing machines you have listed are AMD based, or
old
Dust2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2003 01:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
What map is this on?
Jeremy
-Original Message-
Ive
uick enough to
> make money still then i will look into this. My wife works at a lawfirm.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Sykes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:57 PM
> Subject: RE: [OT] [h
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Matthew Donnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't describe the p3 architecture as anywhere near current and
> in fact group it with p2/athlon as a more efficient per mhz chip than
> p4.
>
> Specifically, have you tested with the p4 cor
>
>> Alfred: All the testing machines you have listed are AMD based, or
>> older intel base. Given that all these architectures are more
>> efficient per clock cycle is HLDS really emphasising the calc per
>> clock cycle disparity between intel/amd cpus?
>> Is there any oppurtunity for Valve testin
Here you basically say, that you won't bother to actually fix anything, since
the hl-engine is about to die anyway?
(Since you're only willing to change compiler, not the actual source.)
And btw, I assume you use gcc 2.95 now, are you aware that it doesn't even
have athlon optimizations?
gcc 3.3 wi
> Alfred: All the testing machines you have listed are AMD based, or
> older intel base. Given that all these architectures are more
> efficient per clock cycle is HLDS really emphasising the calc per
> clock cycle disparity between intel/amd cpus?
> Is there any oppurtunity for Valve testing on a
ouch!
so the nix version is using approx 10 MORE% cpu with 25% FEWER players compared
to the win32. Thats not such a good advertisement for the linux port on intel
hardware.
You dont perchance happen to have an AMD based machine to perform the same testing
on?
I do, but am lacking the pipe to test
What map is this on?
Jeremy
-Original Message-
Ive just tested 1.6 on a dual 2.4ghz windows 2000 server :
Sys_ticrate 100:
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
34.54 88.42 113.58 250 300 92.71 19
33.72 91.46 119.78 250 300 92.25 19
25.00 89.28 117.
Same here on the CPU usage - we've had no complaints yet.
Britt
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to C
at Valve says: "Good
things come to those that wait":-)
Britt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> PS - one la
91283 90.92 14
43.25 51.10 63.03 91283 91.12 14
43.80 50.12 61.70 91283 83.35 14
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Donnon
Sent: 24 September 2003 00:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] [
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Donnon
Sent: 24 September 2003 00:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
>HLDS shows the CPU usage for the processor it currently resides
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
->[EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:28 PM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
->
->How long is v
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] [hlds_linux] Valve's Response to CPU Usage
> PS - one last thing all you small time server admins (like myself) out
there
> maki
25 matches
Mail list logo
