On 22 Sep 2020, at 17:18, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hiya,
On 22/09/2020 22:08, Lee, Yiu wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the notes. Actually, we believe that there are good
privacy reasons to randomize mac-address. This BoF isn't trying to
"fix" randomized mac-address. On the contrary, we want the
On 15 Mar 2019, at 8:34, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
PIE [...] lends itself better for implementation in existing
hardware,
or hardware with small modification.
Could one of you please explain why?
With the caveat that I have never worked with any of this har
On 30 May 2018, at 19:39, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 31/05/2018 08:53, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Well, let me invent something. I throw together my network and
it
names the printers as printer1 and printer2. Being a stickler,
I decide to rename them as Printer 1 and Printer 2. I m
Silly question:
Isn’t the border defined by a link and not a router? What if you have uplinks
to two different ISPs on the same router?
This seems to assume there’s only one border link on a router, and that router
connects to only one external entity.
On Oct 27, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Michael Klobe
On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Rene Struik wrote:
> It seems that the cryptographic literature needs to be rewritten now ...
>
> ==
> Anything you can do with a cert, you can do with raw public keys, and you
> don't need CA's. See RFC4871 for an example.
I would have thought it was the opposite
On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 06:57 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:02 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>> My machines have names. Those names don't change as I move around
>>> the world. Random DHCP servers at coffee shops DO NOT have the
>>> abilit
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> I've been rereading the charter and the -arch document and they both
> seem to make a presumption that we actually know what the problems
> are in a homenet. At the very least, I'm not convinced that we've captured
> what those problems are. Th
On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:13 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Not sure if this is on or off-topic for this working group but here's a
> recent extension to my home network setup:
>
> http://thingsonip.blogspot.fr/2012/03/smart-igloos.html
>
I assume you need special protocols to get through - does that me
On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:16 PM 3/13/12, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 Mar 2012, at 15:22, Fred Baker wrote:
>>
>>> ICANN is now selling "dotless" names. A name without dots has a defined
>>> behavior in most DNS resolvers; they find a way
On Oct 26, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Wassim Haddad wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
> Title: Ensuring Home Network Visibility to Home Gateway
>
> This memo describes a mechanism designed to increase the home gateway
> visibil
On Aug 7, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Looks obvious, but is it?
>
Yes.
> In one hand, we want the capability to reach anywhere we're allowed to from
> home. OTOH, if anything in my home is reachable from anywhere, we are back to
> the firewall paradigm.
>
Why? You a
11 matches
Mail list logo
