Re: [homenet] [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-09: (with BLOCK)

2014-10-02 Thread Sheng Jiang
I am fully agree with Brian and Kathleen. It is well understood that the new WG would study on existing solutions and ongoing proposals to make sure it is necessary to create new mechanisms. Coordination and awareness is essential for the ANIMA group. Best regards, Sheng __

Re: [homenet] [Anima] Ted Lemon's Block on charter-ietf-anima-00-09: (with BLOCK)

2014-10-02 Thread Sheng Jiang
I also think ISP networks and enterprise networks are different from home networks. Although many requirements may looks similar, particularly considering the auto operation target, there are many preconditions are different. It could result on different solution though some components may be r

Re: [homenet] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-10-28 Thread Sheng Jiang
Hi, Benoit and all, Reply in lines. On 29/10/2014 09:13, Benoit Claise wrote: >Dear all, > >[sorry for double-posting, but we need the specific feedback from the >HOMENET community] > >1. scope >I finished reading the ANIMA mailing list and, based on the feedback, >Joel, Ted, and I would like to

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-10-30 Thread Sheng Jiang
>I would personally rather drop prefix management. At least, the current >proposed solution is DHCPv6 PD plus lot of marketing plus one extra thing >(role) minus tons of existing functionality. I would rather stick the role >into PD, >than reinvent the protocol. DHCPv6 PD has only solve the prefi

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-10-31 Thread Sheng Jiang
>-Original Message- >From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon >Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 6:32 PM >To: Sheng Jiang >Cc: Benoit Claise; homenet@ietf.org; Markus Stenberg; an...@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [Anima] [homenet] ANIMA scope + h

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-10-31 Thread Sheng Jiang
prefix delegation work. Best regards, Sheng From: Ted Lemon [mel...@fugue.com] Sent: 31 October 2014 22:34 To: Sheng Jiang Cc: Benoit Claise; homenet@ietf.org; Markus Stenberg; an...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Anima] [homenet] ANIMA scope + homenet

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-11-01 Thread Sheng Jiang
t: 31 October 2014 23:47 To: Sheng Jiang Cc: Benoit Claise; homenet@ietf.org; Markus Stenberg; an...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15 On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote: > The current general mechanism are too general to work for

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-11-01 Thread Sheng Jiang
; Ted Lemon; Benoit Claise; homenet@ietf.org; an...@ietf.org; Sheng Jiang Subject: Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15 On 01/11/2014 12:28, Ralph Droms wrote: > > > >> On Oct 31, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: >> >>> On Oct

Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

2014-11-01 Thread Sheng Jiang
participation in this discussion. Best regards, Sheng From: homenet [homenet-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Ted Lemon [mel...@fugue.com] Sent: 01 November 2014 20:31 To: Sheng Jiang Cc: Benoit Claise; homenet@ietf.org; Markus Stenberg; an...@ietf.org Subject