Scott,
and this recording was done using the Leloir score of the Haydn (? I have to
check myt books when home !). And, how do you know, that Kling added notes
to Mozarts say K.495, as the first movement & the main part of the 2nd
movement are not preserved as autograph , but just in the earliest e
Hans (and list):
Apologies for the delay, as I have been out of town
the past several weeks. Professor Pizka, I do not
believe I compared my own reduction with the Leloir or
Musica Rara editions. My words were "I'd wager that my
reduction is better" - at no time did I write "I have
seen these redu
Scott, if you have not seen the Leloir or Musica Rara piano reduction, how
does it come that you compare your edition with others ? This is something
strange. I do not know any other edition of the double concerto in question.
And regarding the Mozart concertos: I have had the chance to listen to m
Scott, if you have not seen the Leloir or Musica Rara piano reduction, how
does it come that you compare your edition with others ? This is something
strange. I do not know any other edition of the double concerto in question.
And regarding the Mozart concertos: I have had the chance to listen to m
All:
As stated before, I have seen neither the Leloir (full
score or piano reduction - in fact, I was unaware of
their existence prior to being kindly informed by
Professor Pizka) nor the Musica Rara scores to the
Haydn double concerto. Certainly, my intention is not
to plagarize the work of other
The second transcriber ought to be safe from a copyright
infringement suit if whatever is new and creative in the
first transcriber's version is avoided. The two
transcriptions could very well resemble each other in many
ways without copyright infringement, because both are based
on and resemble H
If -- contrary to the facts of Mr. Pappal's case -- the
second transcriber has access to the work of the first, he
can still make and copyright his own transcription, freely
making use of the objective or "factual" information in the
first transcription. However, in that case, coincidences in
th
Hans Pizka wrote:
>
> Sorry, Amy, if Scott uses the scores available on the
> market (edited by Edmond Leloir - former KaWe or the
> other score from Musica Rara) instead of any score from
> complete Haydn Works (I do not know it yet), he is
> breaching the copyright law, as he is using copyright
ver,
> he's not breaking copyright, is he?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Hans Pizka
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 7:36 PM
> To: The Horn List
> Subject: Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano
sn't. Check out
http://www.law.cornell.edu/topics/copyright.html for more detailed
information.
Sean
message: 5
date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
from: Scott Pappal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
subject: Re: [Hornlist] haydn concerto piano reduction
All and professor Pizka:
I appreci
nlist] haydn concerto piano reduction
Hello Scott,
the piano reduction for that double concerto is not #out of print since
long#, very sorry, it is available at any time in Edmond Leloirs
reduction
from the original score, which is protected under copyright. It is K.100
or
K.099 as full score & the
The original versions of Haydn's works are long since in the
public domain. The particular piano reduction referred to
by Professor Pizka may still be protected by copyright.
However, if you have prepared your own piano reduction (you
called it "a reduction done by myself" and said you had
never
Perhaps I was slightly hasty in withdrawing my
original offer. It appears that a reduction is
available in Edmond Leloir's catalogue, a fact of
which I was made aware of by Professor Pizka.
Previously, I had posted that, to the best of my
knowledge, only one prior reduction had been made and
that i
At 02:00 PM 8/8/04 -0700, Scott Pappal wrote:
>since I don't want
>to violate any copyright laws, I must withdraw my
>offer of the piano reduction to this concerto.
If the original score is in the public domain and that is what you used as
source material for your piano reduction then you are not
All and professor Pizka:
I appreciate the information - and since I don't want
to violate any copyright laws, I must withdraw my
offer of the piano reduction to this concerto. Thank
you for the update!
Scott in Altoona
--- Hans Pizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> the piano redu
Hello Scott,
the piano reduction for that double concerto is not #out of print since
long#, very sorry, it is available at any time in Edmond Leloirs reduction
from the original score, which is protected under copyright. It is K.100 or
K.099 as full score & the parts are available as well.
Greeti
16 matches
Mail list logo
