In the UK at the end of the evening there is a well known phrase used in
places that serve alcohol.
"Time gentlemen please."
The post that set this off had an element of frustration and it was
unfortunate that the subject was a sensitive one at that time. With a bit
of good will it could have
Hi, Dale:
My comments inline.
On 15/12/17 20:41, Dale Kunce wrote:
Rafael,
Saying things like "x is childish" is not in keeping with good manners.
Maybe not with your own, cultural, manners. It's ok for me. That's what
I thought when I read his email. Honestly.
I think the larger point
I don't have a background in social behavior, but I've worked for a long
time on freedom of expression, so let me take a crack here.
I think that it is important to recognize to all sides of this argument are
pro-speech. All want to see the best ideas rise. But they have slightly
different
Rafael,
Saying things like "x is childish" is not in keeping with good manners.
I think the larger point is that this space is not "gentle." We clearly
need a CoC or at the very least to enforce the rules we (OSM) already have
in place. OSM is not so special from every other internet community.
Hi, Pete:
Yes, I forgot to say my opinion about the user who said he was
unsubscribing.
In my opinion, it's childish to quit an open forum, where anyone can
subscribe, just because somebody says something you don't like.
Specially when you see already some people telling you that no one can
The reason I joined this listserv was so that users could help each other with
issues and problems they faced while helping to create maps for countries that
don’t have the capabilities themselves. Out of the other listservs I am a part
of, this one is by far the most troublesome, just like
I feel almost all friction on this list, right now and in the past, has
been between "those that want to organize" and those that do not want to be
organized.
The hot mailinglist is the only one in the openstreetmap lists I see this
happen.
Maybe somebody with a background in social behaviour
Just to clear the air. I misspoke in my initial post when I said the HOT
CoC would be enforced on this list. I've since learned that the HOT list is
not administered by HOT and thus our community crafted CoC does not apply
here. Note: it does apply to all other HOT communication channels,
Hi Rafael, I see your point about the CoC and ownership of the list. But
that was only the third paragraph of Dale's email.
The fact remains that a person was told they are one of a hated group of
people and left the list. It's a loss. Are we comfortable with that? Is it
just the way it is and
Hi all,
I would prefer to participate in mailing lists that are governed by CoC and
enforced by an organized group rather than individuals.
=Russ
-Original Message-
From: Dan S [mailto:danstowell+...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:11 AM
To: Rafael Avila Coya
Cc:
Hi, Dan:
The thing here is that hot@openstreetmap.org is, as far as I know, an
OSM mailing list, not HOT US inc.'s. I would find it weard that another
OSM mailing list was governed by the Red Cross, and that talk-es was
governed by the Spanish Government, for example.
Cheers,
Rafael.
On
>but it's probably not clear to the average participant in the hot@ mailing
list whether they are automatically made a part of the HOT community.
I think there are two parts, those who subscribe to the current mailing
list and the "inner clique" who are invited to become a HOT member.
Hi
It does seem to me that more clarity would be good here, i.e. slightly
disentangling the lines of accountability regarding the hot@ mailing
list.
Mikel's response has logical sense, but it's probably not clear to the
average participant in the hot@ mailing list whether they are
automatically
Hi Miriam:
I agree with you: I don't see the need to open yet another mailing list
(although I will be happy if some decide to open a new one anyway), and
to try to collaborate and unify efforts.
But this thread was started by Dale Kunce, President of HOT US inc, who
says things like "I
It will be great if we don't open more mailing lists and we try to
collaborate and unify efforts in the current lists
Thanks,
M
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
> The hot@openstreetmap.org mailing list is not subject to any more
> restrictions than
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Milo van der Linden
wrote:
> Could we ask the OSMF if we can set up a humanitar...@openstreetmap.org
> mailing list that is not subject of HOT restrictions and open to everyone
> under the same rules and regulations of other OSM mailinglists?
The hot@openstreetmap.org mailing list is not subject to any more restrictions
than any other OSMF maintained list. It is not restricted to HOT members and
partners, nor is it subject to HOT governance.
Here is my response from yesterday clarifying, in case you missed it.
> Sure, a simple
Could we ask the OSMF if we can set up a humanitar...@openstreetmap.org
mailing list that is not subject of HOT restrictions and open to everyone
under the same rules and regulations of other OSM mailinglists?
2017-12-14 18:40 GMT+01:00 nicolas chavent :
> Dear all HOT
18 matches
Mail list logo