Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-03-19 Thread Dale Kunce
survey. > > > > For Haiyan we did > > 1. Aerial imagery evaluation > > 2. Aerial imagery revision (later revising objects already > > evaluated) > > 3. Red Cross did some Field survey evaluations. > > > > About t

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-03-19 Thread Jean-Guilhem Cailton
liate queries. > For example > select key=damage:evaluation: > select key=damage:evaluation:barrier: > > Overpass Regex query can be used except I think adding a > negation. > see > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Key.2Fvalue_

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-25 Thread Mark Cupitt
Hi Althio Thanks, good info These would have to be dealt with in HStore in Postgres, it would blow the column count out dramatically in Postgres, with an infinite number of tag/key combinations (everything left of the first '=' would get its own column or is considered a Tag in Hstore. The beaut

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-24 Thread althio
Hi Pierre, Mark and all FYI some related schemes -- currently used or proposed in OSM -- are gathered at this page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts In particular this section http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#.3Cstatus.3E:.3

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
opy, distribute, >> or use the contents of this email. If you have received this email in >> error, please notify the sender immediately and >> delete the email and any attachments. >> ===

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Blake Girardot
r>> *À :* Markware Software Services mailto:markwaresoftw...@gmail.com>> *Cc :* HOT Openstreetmap mailto:hot@openstreetmap.org>>; S Volk mailto:svo...@hotmail.com>> *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 22 janvier 2015 22h30 *Objet :* Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation taggi

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Kate Chapman
== > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: > >> Mark >> >> About the prefix hot:, this is reserved for the HOT private store. Adding >> this prefix to objects in JOSM, the objects are sav

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
egular_expression_.28.7E.22key_regex.22.7E.22value_regex.22.29 >> >> Would it be efficient to make efficient Regex queries with postgresql? >> Then, I think that the order of the elements would be less a problem. >> >> >> Pierre >> >> ---

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
ila Coya > *À :* hot@openstreetmap.org > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 22 janvier 2015 21h24 > *Objet :* Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema > > > > Hi Pierre: > > I like this schema. Only two questions: > > What do you mean with evaluation and revision? > Why no

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
: > >> Mark >> >> About the prefix hot:, this is reserved for the HOT private store. Adding >> this prefix to objects in JOSM, the objects are saved in the HOT private >> store. >> >> Pierre >> >> -- >> *De :*

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
> *De :* Pierre Béland > *À :* Markware Software Services > *Cc :* HOT Openstreetmap ; S Volk < > svo...@hotmail.com> > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 22 janvier 2015 22h30 > *Objet :* Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema > > Hi Mark > > I agree, we have to consid

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Pierre Béland
22 janvier 2015 21h24 Objet : Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema Hi Pierre: I like this schema. Only two questions: What do you mean with evaluation and revision? Why not the event in 3rd and type of object at the end? Cheers, Rafael. On 23/01/15 02:33, Pierre Béland wrote: > F

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Pierre Béland
22h30 Objet : Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema Hi Mark I agree, we have to consider also aspects like how easy to extract for an event. For Haiyan, we had a specific tag. But what, if it would have be necessary to add tags recently for Hagupit? About SQL queries, are-they any

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Pierre Béland
contains "haiyan" ?  Pierre De : Markware Software Services À : Pierre Béland Cc : HOT Openstreetmap ; S Volk Envoyé le : Jeudi 22 janvier 2015 21h21 Objet : Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema Hi Pierre Excellent Thoughts. Interestingly, I am working on a 3D re

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Rafael Avila Coya
Hi Pierre: I like this schema. Only two questions: What do you mean with evaluation and revision? Why not the event in 3rd and type of object at the end? Cheers, Rafael. On 23/01/15 02:33, Pierre Béland wrote: > From the discusssion about mapping North of Nigeria, I open a distinct > thread ab

Re: [HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Markware Software Services
Hi Pierre Excellent Thoughts. Interestingly, I am working on a 3D rendering of buildings project now, and was planning on extending this to HOT's work when done with the commercial project. Having everything in one tag "k=" as you propose helps the query and rendering scenario a lot. The only dow

[HOT] Damage evaluation tagging schema

2015-01-22 Thread Pierre Béland
>From the discusssion about mapping North of Nigeria, I open a distinct thread >about the Damage evaluation discussion about the more technical aspects >related to Damage evaluation and tagging schema. This wiki page describes the schema used for the Haiyan typhoon.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org