Ahhh, that did it! Looks great! That is really a cool feature.
Thank you very much.
Alex
Bruno Postle schrieb:
> On Tue 25-Nov-2008 at 23:54 +0100, Alexander Senger wrote:
>> The alignment is fine and after applying the exposure optimization
>> for LDR without white-balance I get a mean square
Does anyone know where could I find a good opensource software to
Optical Mark Recognition (OMR)?
Thanks,
Alfredo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A lis
Hi Bruno
On Nov 25, 10:11 am, Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon 24-Nov-2008 at 17:47 -0800, Tom Sharpless wrote:
>
>
>
> >> >> >>http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/frac/ho_52.63.2.htm#
> >>http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3056638979/
> >Would agree that your tilted Pani
I found why hugin and nona weren't working correctly with response
type set to gamma -- there was an integer/double conversion bug in
lut.h.
I just checked in a fix to that and at least now if a PTO file has
the response type set to gamma (Rt=2), then Hugin and nona seem to
do the right thing.
Hi Mick
Here is a very interesting paper on making strip panoramas out of
ordinary photos taken from multiple viewpoints, written by one of the
leaders in commercial image processing technology:
http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/multipano/agarwala_sig06.pdf.
It was inspired by the work of a
The current version of Hugin supports 2 response types, linear and
EMoR.I remember a while back Bruno posted something to the effect
that the gamma response type was obsolete. I'd like to reopen that.
When you're estimating the response type, the EMoR seems like a fine
way to proceed. How
On Tue 25-Nov-2008 at 23:54 +0100, Alexander Senger wrote:
>
>The alignment is fine and after applying the exposure optimization
>for LDR without white-balance I get a mean squared error of 5.39
>greylevels (Graustufen).
>But for the stitched panorama the exposure for the different parts
>seem
Hello list,
I have an odd problem here for which I can't find a solution. I took a batch of
nine, partly
overlapping pictures to form a panorama. Unfortunately the picture feature
quite different exposures.
Here the new exposure tab would come in handy. At least that's what I
understood: hugin
Cristian Marchi writes:
> I hope this is the right place to ask but tonight I've built Hugin
> (version 0.8.0.3563) on my ubuntu Intrepid 64 bit and tried it.
>
> All went well until I press the "stitch now!" button. Here is the output
> I get
>
> nona -z PACKBITS -r ldr -m TIFF_m -o neve -i 0
I hope this is the right place to ask but tonight I've built Hugin
(version 0.8.0.3563) on my ubuntu Intrepid 64 bit and tried it.
All went well until I press the "stitch now!" button. Here is the output
I get
nona -z PACKBITS -r ldr -m TIFF_m -o neve -i 0 /tmp/huginpto_VVm2Mx
nona -z PACKBIT
Quoting Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
> >The "cuboid" is not technically a multi-point perspective, because all
> >6 faces are viewed from the same point, but it is certainly a multiple
> >perspective, as each face has a different projection axis. Presented
> >flat, it can't be seen as a
On Mon 24-Nov-2008 at 17:47 -0800, Tom Sharpless wrote:
>
>> >> >>http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/frac/ho_52.63.2.htm#
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3056638979/
>Would agree that your tilted Panini does not look as "right" as the
>original? A lot of that is just because slan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dunno,
> compare this
>
> http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/2004/Hockney/large/HockneyMosaic.jpg
>
> to how a perfectly stitched view of the same scene would look.
>
> which would be most intriguing ?
>
This image was mentioned by Hockney in his program
discussi
Quoting paul womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This image was mentioned by Hockney in his program
> discussing the possible involvement of lenses
> in earlier-than-we-thought paintings.
Hockney's a genius. I saw a tv lecture by him in the 70's, if not earlier,
about television. He proposed that in
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:19:41 -0800, erwan-yves wrote:
> Hello,
> I just install Hugin 0.7 on my new installed Mandriva 2009, and have a
> systematic message when trying making a panorama execvp(make, -f,
> /home/yves/tmp/huginmk_oMOZe0, all, clean) failed with error 2!
> Can someone help?
https:
I dunno,
compare this
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/2004/Hockney/large/HockneyMosaic.jpg
to how a perfectly stitched view of the same scene would look.
which would be most intriguing ?
regards
mick
--
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline
Quoting Tom Sharpless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But what about curved trajectories, walking around
> corners, etc? I've seen very convincing looking multipoint panos
> taken from such trajectories.
I'd like to see that if you have any links ?
> My point is just that the limits on what can be r
Seems celeste has problems dealing with 16bit TIFF files.. other formats
should be ok. I'll investigate this.
Tim
grow wrote:
> Harry,
>
> Thanks.
>
> I tried those files you sent me ... I clicked the "Run Celeste"
> button in the Control Points panel and it work removing all cloudy-
> point
18 matches
Mail list logo
