[hugin-ptx] Re: Success building hugin-2009.2.0 with cygwin/mingw

On Oct 24, 12:46 am, Yuval Levy wrote: > Ryan wrote: > > 1. Is anyone interested in playing with the build I have? > > I would like to hear from users comparing your cygwin build with an MSVC > build. Not in terms of size (disk space is cheap nowadays) but in terms > of speed and performance. I

[hugin-ptx] Re: Success building hugin-2009.2.0 with cygwin/mingw

Ryan wrote: > Any suggestions where to host it? The group's file area has a 10MB > limit, and I don't really have a web page handy. there is ftp space on the panotools.org site. I need to find the login credentials that I misplaced. Harry uploads there regularly OSX versions, he might help you

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hi Terry, Tduell wrote: > Do changes/edits show up immediately after saving? they should. I don't see your edits... Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" gro

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hullo Yuv, On Oct 25, 3:09 pm, Yuval Levy wrote: [snip] > no need to apologize, and it was not a wasting of time, at least not of > mine and I hope not of yours either. You may want to record your > learning, e.g. in - this will > actually be a time saver

[hugin-ptx] Re: Next GUI - take 2-1/2

Hi Bill, thanks for sharing the detailed information about your workflow. to my understanding, the issues at Zenith and Nadir are shooting issues, not stitching issues. The upcoming new Layout with XYZ parameters may be of help for you with off-center nadir shots. To ease manual placement of

[hugin-ptx] Re: Success building hugin-2009.2.0 with cygwin/mingw

On Oct 24, 10:20 pm, Bruno Postle wrote: > >- does not include Java support or a control point generator (didn't > >try yet) > > Don't worry about java support in libpano13, this isn't used by > anything. Good to know. Thanks! > > >- a script syntax error prevents stitching (haven't debugged y

[hugin-ptx] Re: Next GUI - take 2-1/2

too confusing IMO. the solution to a flipped panorama is a numeric transform, roll 180°. http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ#Why_is_my_panorama_upside_down_.3F Yuv Carl von Einem wrote: > We have now two different anchor buttons in the Images tab. How about > adding two more buttons: > - Ancho

[hugin-ptx] Re: (Probably very basic) help needed for build process on WinXP: missing files?

Salut Nicolas, Nicolas Pelletier wrote: > I update the wiki merci! > why use png and jpg from one lib, and tiff from another? lazyness? you probably could also use tiff from wxWidget, but it is an older version. IIRC tifflib has added features that are worth the effort compared to what is i

[hugin-ptx] Primitive Aggressive Caching - take 2

Hi all, I have not yet implemented Lukas' suggestion (background thread) - I am reading about background threads in wxWidgets. I did however spend more time with the feature, and I find it helpful with my typical settings. No need for this on my dual core workstation, but on my 1.6GHz Pentium

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hi Terry, Tduell wrote: > It now looks like it has been a problem with the way I was optimising. > Bruno had a look at the pto files and reported... > "The problem seems to be that all lens parameters (a,b,c,d,e) were > optimised for both photos, if I reset everything and just optimise > 'positio

[hugin-ptx] Re: (Probably very basic) help needed for build process on WinXP: missing files?

Hey guys, I just spend a little more time on the setup. Didn't get enblend to build yet, but getting closer. I update the wiki with what I did in case somebody tries to setup. As I was reading this thread for a few walls I've been hitting... I saw that one of my assumptions was probably wrong. I

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hullo Yuv, On Oct 25, 1:00 pm, Yuval Levy wrote: [snip] > When in doubt always post at least the PTO file. It's small and gives > plenty of useful info. OK. > >  From my perspective there are a lot of things that need to be done on > Hugin. More than anybody here has time to spare. When I enga

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hi Terry, Tduell wrote: > I did provide files showing the problem as I saw it I had to look for the files. It was not immediately obvious to me that they are in the GoogleGroup's files area. And when I opened them I saw what you saw, but I did not see what is needed to reproduce and understan

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Hullo Yuv, On Oct 25, 9:34 am, Yuval Levy wrote: > note for the future: I ignore reports that are difficult to make sense > of. It is the responsibility of the reporter to facilitate the task of > the reader; to provide files or links to complete test cases. > > even better for suspected bugs:

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Bruno Postle wrote: > Users of the Assistant have no information to make a sensible choice > about either of these tools, luckily we have kept this sort of bloat > out of the Assistant so far. "check this box if your panorama has clouds in the sky". a user that does not have information to mak

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste missing in SVN 4450 (Windows)

J. Schneider wrote: > Hi, > hugin SVN 4450 (on Windows) expects celeste in > \share\hugin\data. > This directory (and neither the file) exist in my installation. (Copied > from a previous one and it works.) Is this an installer issue or > something else? actually it is the celeste model that is

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

On Sat 24-Oct-2009 at 18:54 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >I also don't think we should run cpclean by default. Disagree, this is exactly the sort of thing Hugin should be doing, the whole point of having an Assistant is to make as many automatic decisions about the project as possible. >And now

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sat 24-Oct-2009 at 18:34 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: >> may be that the result of using the 'clean control points' is 'broken'. >> >> even if it was, I would not call it a step backward but rather a step on >> the place. It would be a step backward if 'clean control points' w

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

On Sat 24-Oct-2009 at 18:34 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >may be that the result of using the 'clean control points' is 'broken'. > >even if it was, I would not call it a step backward but rather a step on >the place. It would be a step backward if 'clean control points' was >mandated. It is not. Y

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

Tduell wrote: > Everyone is extremely quiet on this subject...nary a peep! I did not see any file attached nor any link in any of your previous three mails. I'd call it "incomplete bug report" and move on. The nagging disturbed me enough to do some search. So I've found what you uploaded [0] a

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

On Sat 24-Oct-2009 at 14:44 -0700, Terry Duell wrote: > >Everyone is extremely quiet on this subject...nary a peep! Sorry didn't have any obvious test images to try. I've just downloaded the two photos from your multi-lens tutorial: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/multi-lens/ They are

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.4.0 RC2 'clean control points' produces crook (bad) result

On Oct 22, 10:15 am, Tduell wrote: > Sorry, it is 2009.4.0_RC2 that I am using. Everyone is extremely quiet on this subject...nary a peep! Has anyone else experienced similar problems? It looks to me like the 'clean control points' option, when using more than one lens, is a step backward...

[hugin-ptx] Re: Success building hugin-2009.2.0 with cygwin/mingw

On Thu 22-Oct-2009 at 17:12 -0700, Ryan wrote: > >Hugin's new opengl support got me drooling, and I couldn't find a >working windows binary in the usual places, so I tackled a 32-bit >cygwin/mingw compile (gcc -mno-cygwin) of hugin-2009.2.0 last week. >Caveats: >- does not include Java support or

[hugin-ptx] Celeste missing in SVN 4450 (Windows)

Hi, hugin SVN 4450 (on Windows) expects celeste in \share\hugin\data. This directory (and neither the file) exist in my installation. (Copied from a previous one and it works.) Is this an installer issue or something else? regards Joachim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Y

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.4.0_rc2 tarball released

Andreas Metzler wrote: > This tarball contains some cruft: sorry for that. will pay more attention when releasing rc3. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" g

[hugin-ptx] Re: Success building hugin-2009.2.0 with cygwin/mingw

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:46:27PM -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > > the ideal untar/configure/make/make install/ process. > > ideal in the Unix world, but not really in the Windows world? If you're on "cygwin" you're on Unix, except that it's running on a different kernel. roger. -- **

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.4.0_rc2 tarball released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Panorama stitching and more. A powerful software package for creation > and processing of panoramic images. > hugin-2009.4.0_rc2 (release candidate 2) tarball is available here: [...] This tarball contains some cruft: ametz...@argenau:/tmp$ tar tzf hugin-2009.4.0_rc2.tar.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Linear Panograph

it's tricky and time consuming. most people resort to fixing them by hand in photoshop or gimp. mick 2009/10/23 Dale Beams : > I'd like to create a linear panograph of our small downtown.  This would > encompass 18 blocks.  I think I can create a pano at the end of each block > and then insert it