Hi Bernd
On Oct 31, 7:02 am, Bernd Hohmann hohm...@harddiskcafe.de wrote:
On 31.10.2010 03:14, Tom Sharpless wrote:
Tom,
It is a fact that SIFT does not find as many matches as we would like
in wide angle and especially fisheye images. But that problem will
not be solved by better
so, it would be an interesting thing to create a template.pto before, and
include it in the ASIFT source code, and see what happens??
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Tom Sharpless tksharpl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bernd
On Oct 31, 7:02 am, Bernd Hohmann hohm...@harddiskcafe.de wrote:
On
On 01.11.2010 14:32, Tom Sharpless wrote:
Tom,
As far as I can see, ASIFT is doing its job very well even with fisheye
images and without calibration data.
That is surprising to me. As I understand the description of ASIFT
(which is not very well) it assumes that the source images are in
maybe its because the algorith isnt written for high detail pics, so it
might work with 640*480 resolution images or 800*600...
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Bernd Hohmann hohm...@harddiskcafe.dewrote:
On 01.11.2010 14:32, Tom Sharpless wrote:
Tom,
As far as I can see, ASIFT is doing
On 01.11.2010 16:49, john doe wrote:
maybe its because the algorith isnt written for high detail pics, so it
might work with 640*480 resolution images or 800*600...
It works perfectly with high resolution images, its a matter of the
number of contrast changes (or so). I guess a fine
ok im out for now, im going to check out some avidemux code...i think hugin
can use some part of it and FFMPEG to read videos to convert them to
diffrent projections and do video stitching...i opened a thread on this,
havent seen any replies..
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Bernd Hohmann
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:31 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
the current Stitcher tab displays well on high resolution displays (e.g.
1920x1080) but a major drawback on the average notebook display (1366x768):
it
must be scrolled (although well designed, with the buttons fix).
I find I don't often
On 1 Nov., 01:02, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Sorry, we are really suffering from a lack of documentation
considering how often we get requests for features that already
exist.
I think this is true. It's sad, but true. An undocumented feature
might as well not be there. Someone has
i have an ideahave any of you seen mpremap??it is used for single video
motion panorama projection transformation...it usess ffmpeg and libpano...
Why not build hugin with ffmpeg libraries, to be able to read video and
change the projections??this could be a step towards making hugin a video
Hi Eric,
On 1 Nov., 06:34, Eric O'Brien eri...@extramonday.com wrote:
The multi-row option is more sophisticated than this, matching
consecutive images is only the first step in the process. It is
able to deal with rows or columns in any order.
Does this require using a pre-aligned
On 01.11.2010 20:51, T. Modes wrote:
Does this require using a pre-aligned panorama (as below), or is it
expected to succeed with images in the project in any order and all
beginning placed at 0, 0, 0?
The positions of the images has no influence on the multi-row option.
The order is
On Mon 01-Nov-2010 at 12:46 -0700, Thomas Modes wrote:
I would like to keep the controls on the sticher tab. This allows
me to change some aspects without opening the preview window. If I
want only change a simple aspect, I can do it without to wait for
the preview.
To be able to move
On Sun 31-Oct-2010 at 08:08 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
However afaict these libraries are not supposed to be used by
programs outside hugin. Nobody seems to be responsible for
defining and monitoring a public interface. The libraries are not
versioned. Stuff should just work for hugin.
--- On Sat, 30/10/10, paisajesenvenezuela guerrerodelu...@gmail.com wrote:
has any of the hugin creators though
about using FFMPEG, OPENCV and
LIBPANO to make user open, read, write video files and to
be able to
stitch theM??
VLC is made with QT, and uses FFMPEG, so if any of the
coders
Well, since all mentioned applications are open source, why don't you
go ahead and start mashing up a nice program? Or do you think this
will be too much work or too hard?
/irony
I'm not here to discourage anyone, but seriously, this suggestion is
very far from a simple / easy / straightforward
--- On Tue, 2/11/10, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, since all mentioned
applications are open source, why don't you
go ahead and start mashing up a nice program? Or do you
think this
will be too much work or too hard?
/irony
I got other project more important, eg:
Firstly i stated in the hugin group that im not a programmer, im a lawyer,
and im beginning to study QT4...
secondly, before ironically commenting about subjects its better to look in
the webas tom stated, i wrote the thread specifically because in DIY
sites there are threads on how to do
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:32 PM, john doe guerrerodelu...@gmail.com wrote:
Firstly i stated in the hugin group that im not a programmer, im a lawyer,
and im beginning to study QT4...
secondly, before ironically commenting about subjects its better to look in
the webas tom stated, i wrote
--- On Tue, 2/11/10, john doe guerrerodelu...@gmail.com wrote:
From: john doe guerrerodelu...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin and video stitching
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Received: Tuesday, 2 November, 2010, 12:02 PM
Firstly i stated in the hugin group that im not a
yes but it is paid and only works in mac and windows...as of now ive been
succesfully encdoing 3 second 360 degree video using ffmpeg, mencoder, hugin
and some perl scripts...
im thinking couldnt it be possible to do a include ffmpeg in hugin, add the
program lines to the source files and headers
As promised:
http://www.tatteredmoons.org/hugin/deb
Build for Nov 01, 2010.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
