Hello,
I am experimenting with the following procedure to remove the blending
error for nadir and zenith vertices of a full spherical panorama:
1) pano01.pto -> this is the regular pano project file with various
images as input, it generates equirectangular pano01.jpg leveled
horizontally.
2) pa
I found them at www.debian-multimedia.org. They're binary only. Debian
dropped them from Sid, so look in the Stable (Squeeze) or Oldstable
(Lenny) package collections there.
The links that Google brings up for autopano-sift go to a file not
found, looks like the uni finally deleted his files.
On Kay's request, a thread of its own for the Python scripting as we move
toward 2011.2.
Since the threads will need to be persistent for a few months as work is in
progress for the next release, I made most issues tracker tickets. Feel free
to add other tracker tickets too, just tag them wit
On May 27, 2011 10:24:50 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> The posted link was broken, this one works:
>
> http://launchpad.net/hugin/2011.0/2011.0rc2/+download/hugin-2011.0.0_rc2.ta
> r.bz2 cu andreas
dooh! it has not occurred to me that it could be the link that is wrong, not
the actual file. sor
I am trying to build from scratch on Kubuntu 10.10 with -
DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
I get the following message right at the beginning of the CMake output:
DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH is not a supported variable name at /usr/bin/dpkg-
architecture line 214.
While we are at it, there I also see twice the wa
On May 27, 2011 10:41:24 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
> FWIW I will not upload this to Debian, since there no changes relevant
> to non-windows platforms compared to rc1 afaict:
indeed, the only change between rc1 and rc2 is a script affecting Windows
users.
Should I have put this sentence in a mor
On May 27, 2011 12:31:34 pm Jim Watters wrote:
> On 2011-05-27 9:06 AM, Yuval Levy wrote:
> > but it's FUN to reinvent the wheel :)
>
> I was not trying to reinvent the wheel. In fact I delayed creating the tool
> until I found the code I needed already written.
If you had quoted correctly, you w
On May 27, 2011 02:12:12 pm T. Modes wrote:
> @Yuv: please read my posting better. I did not say that *I* don't need
> it.
The first sentence I read from you is:
> We don't need a *new* tool.
"I don't need a *new* tool" would have been more acceptable to me. Or just
stating "thank you for the c
There were binaries for windows - GTK+ is multi-platform - if weren't GIMP
wouldn't run there. FreeBSD also have it.
Carlos.
2011/5/27 Gnome Nomad
> From the package description, autopanog requires GTK+, so I'd be surprised
> if it ran under Windows. Don't know about FreeBSD - does it include G
On 27 Mai, 22:12, Bart van Andel wrote:
> Sorry for not replying earlier, but I also think that looking at the
> panosphere from the outside is the right thing to do. Normally the camera is
> inside the sphere, looking at the outside. That's the normal panorama view.
> The spherical view is kind
On Friday, May 27, 2011 9:53:46 PM UTC+2, kfj wrote:
>
> On 27 Mai, 21:39, Milan Knížek wrote:
>
> > Anybody filed it as a bug/feature request? (I have not found anything
> > on launchpad.)
> >
> > The flipped left / right sides are really confusing.
>
> I haven't. Please go ahead and do it.
On 27 Mai, 21:39, Milan Knížek wrote:
> Anybody filed it as a bug/feature request? (I have not found anything
> on launchpad.)
>
> The flipped left / right sides are really confusing.
I haven't. Please go ahead and do it. I'm not convinced by Yuval's
lone voice earlier in this thread telling m
From the package description, autopanog requires GTK+, so I'd be
surprised if it ran under Windows. Don't know about FreeBSD - does it
include GTK+?
Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote:
Have you used the command line autopano-sift-c with the option to do
that? I tried but it got "segmen
Make sure you're looking at autopano-sift, not autopano-sift-c.
autopanog is not in the autopano-sift-c package.
I don't know if it would work or not, but I suppose I could send someone
the executable itself (or perhaps the package)? It runs fine here under
Debian Lenny, don't know what other
V Tue, 17 May 2011 02:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
kfj <_...@yahoo.com> napsáno:
>
>
> > I think it is showing the outside of the panosphere, and I guess it
> > is because that's the "natural" way to look at a sphere (e.g.
> > Earth). I don't know if it is worth to consider this a bug, or
> > rather a fea
Oh, I got it. That's manually creating a horizontal line, not having
CPFind or some other CP generator create them automatically.
Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) wrote:
Hi, maybe you didn't get it (or I didn't), but I don't think it's
"changing an existing **pair* *into hz line". I mean, t
On 27 Mai, 20:37, xraycrystallographer
wrote:
> Thanks for the links Seb ,
>
> I probably didn't make myself clear. The spherical panorama I am
> trying to make is one with the zenith exactly in the center of the
> final image.
I can't see why your approach shouldn't work if you do two takes s
On 27 Mai, 14:06, Yuval Levy wrote:
> In the past it was possible to compile only the Hugin command line tool to use
> them on a CLI-only machine. Is HSI accessible on a CLI-only machine too? I
> currently have no way to verify it. My only CLI-only machine is my FreeBSD
> server and I have not
Thanks for the links Seb ,
I probably didn't make myself clear. The spherical panorama I am
trying to make is one with the zenith exactly in the center of the
final image. I have created several that are described in the
references you gave me. The final image I am after now would be
equivalen
Hi Jim,
> Why does running *cpclean -w -o out.pto in.pto* optimizing all images pairs?
Because cpclean should work direct after the cpfinding step and before
the optimisation step to remove wrong connections.
If it would optimize first and run then cpclean (without optimisation)
it would result
> @Thomas: please speak for yourself when you say that *you* don't need it.
> The *we* is out of place here and discourages potential contributors. Every
> contribution is welcome, and what we need is an orderly way to accomodate
> these contributions, not to refuse them with a generic (and wro
Intel 10.6. I had about 10 4k x 4k or so images loaded.
Allan
On May 27, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
Hi Allan,
2011/5/23 Allan Seidel
Perhaps these have been mentioned before. I am seeing problems in
the Control Points tab. For example when starting to pick a point on
t
On 27 Mai, 18:31, Jim Watters wrote:
> I was not trying to reinvent the wheel. In fact I delayed creating the tool
> until I found the code I needed already written.
But I did, quite deliberately. And it was FUN. I only wrote it just
then when I saw this thread; using hsi this is trivial. Most o
Hi all, Allan,
See below.
2011/5/27 Harry van der Wolf
> Hi Allan,
>
>
> 2011/5/23 Allan Seidel
>
>> Perhaps these have been mentioned before. I am seeing problems in the
>> Control Points tab. For example when starting to pick a point on the left
>> side image a duplicate version of that image
On 2011-05-27 9:06 AM, Yuval Levy wrote:
but it's FUN to reinvent the wheel :)
I was not trying to reinvent the wheel. In fact I delayed creating the tool
until I found the code I needed already written.
and there are many roads that lead to Rome. A simple `man checkpto` yields
"This tool i
See here:
http://www.panoguide.com/forums/tipsntricks/4554/
and here
http://www.nodalninja.com/forum/showthread.php?4114-Revised-version-of-the-tutorial-quot-How-to-make-a-spherical-3D-panorama-with-a-single-camera-and-a-fisheye-lens-quot
A Google search on 360 stereo panoramas will also help you
On 2011-05-27 2:33 AM, T. Modes wrote:
On 27 Mai, 01:14, Yuval Levy wrote:
On May 26, 2011 06:35:26 PM Jim Watters wrote:
I created *parts* by scraping the necessary code out of *cpclean*.
I just noticed that you did not yet have write access to the repository and
granted it to you. You are
My apologies if this is too off-topic. I have been using the latest
versions of Hugin (windows 2011.0.0 RC1) with a quite accurate pano
head to generate some fantastic (IMHO) spherical panoramas—thanks for
the tremendous effort you all are making! The latest version can
usually stitch the approxi
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Yuval Levy wrote:
>> On May 26, 2011 01:12:46 PM Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> Afaict the correct tarball did not make it to either lp or sf. LP 404s
>>> and sf.net has a tarball that only contain the cmake files:
> [...]
>> LP looked good from here. I downloaded the tarbal
Yuval Levy wrote:
> On May 26, 2011 01:12:46 PM Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Afaict the correct tarball did not make it to either lp or sf. LP 404s
>> and sf.net has a tarball that only contain the cmake files:
[...]
> LP looked good from here. I downloaded the tarball and everything is there.
The
Have you used the command line autopano-sift-c with the option to do that? I
tried but it got "segmentation fault" in both Windows and FreeBSD. Maybe it
works on linux.
2011/5/27 Yuval Levy
> ...
> I am still curious about this autopanog thing. The autopano-sift package
> is
> available in Kubu
Yes, Carlos, your explanation is exactly right. And the only reason why
sometimes we might need to go into the list and change the mode is because
AFAIK currently Hugin guesses it (50% chance) based on the orientation of the
picture in the project, but vertical / horizontal control lines are us
On May 27, 2011 05:30:31 AM kfj wrote:
> On 27 Mai, 07:33, "T. Modes" wrote:
> > There is already checkpto which checks if
> > all images are connected. This tools can be easily updated to print
> > also the number of part instead of adding of new one.
>
> but it's FUN to reinvent the wheel :)
Hi, maybe you didn't get it (or I didn't), but I don't think it's "changing
an existing **pair* *into hz line". I mean, to make an only one CP you mark
one point on one window and another on the other. Usually you do both marks
over the same visual point on the image. To mark a line you do the same
kfj schrieb am 27.05.11 11:22:
On 27 Mai, 09:58, Carl von Einem wrote:
IMHO a link to an uploaded file is usually more elegant than sending
attachments to the whole group.
Sorry. I thought 80K wasn't really a problem - after all I didn't
attach the 3M tar file ;-)
I'll be good next time.
N
On 27 Mai, 07:33, "T. Modes" wrote:
> We don't need a *new* tool. There is already checkpto which checks if
> all images are connected. This tools can be easily updated to print
> also the number of part instead of adding of new one.
but it's FUN to reinvent the wheel :)
Here's my hsi version
On 27 Mai, 09:58, Carl von Einem wrote:
> Hi Kay,
> IMHO a link to an uploaded file is usually more elegant than sending
> attachments to the whole group.
Sorry. I thought 80K wasn't really a problem - after all I didn't
attach the 3M tar file ;-)
I'll be good next time.
Kay
--
You received
To get things started, I already posted a patch (which updates the old ISS
installer scripts instead of the new NSIS ones, my bad, but probably still
contains a nice starting point) [0].
And here's the LP link: [1]
[0] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hugin-ptx/E6EC4PCV2fE/7ymv4_kfaBgJ
[1] https:
Hi Kay,
kfj schrieb am 26.05.11 10:00:
Yesterday I posted this message to hugin-ptx by email so as to be able
to attach images showing the problem, but it never appeared here (why
would that be so?). So I'm now posting it via the web interface
without the attachments, if you're interested, foll
This is only a Windows issue, but can the Smartblend wrapper with
instructions be placed in the windows install packages.
Till now you have to download it separately.
Filed the request in Launchpad and sent a PM to Matthew Petroff, the
Windows instaler and binaries builder..
Kind regards,
Henk Ti
40 matches
Mail list logo
