Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.24 released

2013-10-22 Thread Yemi Harris
reuse the pto file that was generated but change the image paths in the i-lines of the pto file, and replace the control points for each new set of images. Does this make sense? On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:41 AM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote: > > On 22 October 2013 16:22, Yem

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.24 released

2013-10-22 Thread Yemi Harris
Hi Bruno, When you say a "good" set of photometric parameters, what exactly do you mean? Sorry for my ignorance, i'm kind of new to the game. Thanks in advance. On Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:54:23 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote: > > On Thu 12-Sep-2013 at 12:56 -0700, Yemi

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.24 released

2013-09-12 Thread Yemi Harris
Hi Bruno, Please could you shed some light on this particular issue I keep running into. I've ran match-n-shift multiple times on the same set of 4 images and every time I get slightly different .pto files. I've done tests to check if the exif data is modified somehow after each run but that, t

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Panotools::Script 0.24 released

2013-09-12 Thread Yemi Harris
final stitched image looks the same even if I run it through the pipeline multiple times? On Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:26:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote: > > > On 12 Sep 2013 20:15, "Yemi Harris" > > wrote: > > > > Please could you shed some light on