Hi Bruno, When you say a "good" set of photometric parameters, what exactly do you mean? Sorry for my ignorance, i'm kind of new to the game. Thanks in advance.
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 5:54:23 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote: > > On Thu 12-Sep-2013 at 12:56 -0700, Yemi Harris wrote: > >Ah, I see, thank you for getting back to me. Knowing this sheds a > >lot of light on why my final stitched photo looks slightly > >different every time I run the same set of images. Is it possible > >to specify what sample it uses from each photo for exposure and > >vignetting optimization, so that the final stitched image looks the > >same even if I run it through the pipeline multiple times? > > Not at the moment, though a patch to force Hugin to use the same > seed every time would be considered - I can't at the moment think > why this would be a problem. > > Alternatively you could save a 'good' set of photometric parameters > and apply them to all photos. > > -- > Bruno > > >On Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:26:34 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle > >wrote: > >> > >> The Hugin photometric (exposure/vignetting) optimisation uses a > >> random sample of from each photo, so you will get slightly > >> different photometric parameters each time. > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1d726170-4aba-47b3-b926-421c5e807a97%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
