Am Sonntag, 9. September 2018 10:22:30 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>
> > The first one is due to the check of plausibility of the EXIF data. This
> > was too hard. I relaxed the check.
>
> What was the issue? The Exif data looked fine to me.
>
The EXIF data were fine. But Hugin does some checks fo
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 8:58:30 -0700, T. Modes wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 07:12:04 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>>
>> TO HUGIN DEVELOPERS: It seems to me that there are bugs involved here,
>> possibly relating to circular fisheye lenses. I take photos with full
>> f
Great! Thanks a lot for the explanation!
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 12:24:57 PM UTC-5, T. Modes wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 18:15:03 UTC+2 schrieb jiang...@gmail.com
> :
>>
>> but I still have a question. saved to the database meaning saved to my
>> computer?
>>
> Yes
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 18:15:03 UTC+2 schrieb jiang...@gmail.com:
>
> but I still have a question. saved to the database meaning saved to my
> computer?
>
Yes.
> if so, I have loaded and stitched those photos for like a dozen times
> already, how come it doesn't recognize them bef
ok, good to know!
but I still have a question. saved to the database meaning saved to my
computer? if so, I have loaded and stitched those photos for like a dozen
times already, how come it doesn't recognize them before?
JJ
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 11:00:11 AM UTC-5, T. Modes wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 17:37:22 UTC+2 schrieb jiang...@gmail.com:
>
> Another weird thing is that Hugin automatically filled out the lens info
> correctly, it also figured out the correct crop area, which I have to
> manually to them before.
>
Nothing weird here. This is exactly what
Hi Greg,
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 07:12:04 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>
> TO HUGIN DEVELOPERS: It seems to me that there are bugs involved here,
> possibly relating to circular fisheye lenses. I take photos with full
> frame fisheyes on a regular basis, and though I have issues that may
> b
Just a follow up on the previous discussion. I have tried 3 different
methods this morning.
1. crop without masks (exactly the same as original post), quality is
still bad as expected.
2. crop with masks, the output is bad as well.
3. masks without crop (from Greg's pto file), the ou
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 12:12:04 AM UTC-5, Groogle wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:43:40 -0700, jiang...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:55:36 -0700, jiang...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> Once is enough,especially since you included relatively
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:43:40 -0700, jiangjia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:55:36 -0700, jiangjia...@gmail.com wrote:
Once is enough,especially since you included relatively large images
(for email). It would have been better to put all the images on your
10 matches
Mail list logo
