Hi Matt,
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
At work, we have a full frame camera system ( 3xCanon EOS-1d) with 50 mm
lenses. Flying that at 1000m gives reasonable detail when looking
straight down and the imaged area is much larger than with your example
I toyed with this (in Linux, and with the latest SVN). Being me, I tried
to push the envelope and see if it can be used for a large linear
panorama riddled with obstacles, parallax, and all funny things to deal
with.
The good news is that TiX, TiY, TiZ is *very promising*.
The bad news is
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 15:54 -0700, Daniel M. German wrote:
did you try optimizing using the tilt model? Tx, Ty and Ts (try those
before you try Tz).
I'll be curious to see what happens.
Sorry, I only tried Pablo's modified version.
Could you post the script so I can try it? Thanks!
I think I
2009/9/23 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Is it possible to view the source images to this example?
Go to http://78.46.66.234/jpeg1600/ and scroll down to image
DSC00539.jpg Pablo used DSC00539.jpg through to DSC00549.jpg to create
the image above. There are higher resolution versions at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dale Beams schreef:
There is software out there for model RC planes that will allow you to
use an altimeter and get a constant height with a gps combo It'll fly a
grid pattern as well.
Yeah right, does that 'software out there' also stitch
Thanks, I see. So the method was to take one shot as straight down as
possible and then to take consecutive shots panning out towards the horizon
perpendicular to the flightpath, and then repeat that procedure from the
downward view, right?
I think the result looks really nice Pablo!
It would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dale Beams schreef:
One doesn't need to take at different heights if your locking in your
height from ground to plane. I live in the Plains and everything is flat.
Likewise here. But still if one blow of wind can take a quad copter
about 2
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at 00:37 +0200, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
Quick procedure:
1. panomatic -o 539-549.pto *.jpg
2. hugin 539-549.pto
- set focal length to 50mm (~ HFOV 26°)
- open fast preview
- set projection to rectilinear,
- select hfov and vfov ~ 100
- show only the first
Hi Bruno,
did you try optimizing using the tilt model? Tx, Ty and Ts (try those
before you try Tz).
I'll be curious to see what happens.
Could you post the script so I can try it? Thanks!
--dmg
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 23-Sep-2009 at
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
0. Get and compile the current trunk of libpano13
If you so happens to build panotools on windows, pls drop me a mail. (and
I'll give this a
2009/9/21 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
Hi Matt,
The general workflow for proper orthorectification (as used by the
professionals) is:
1. Measure some ground control points (GCPs) in the images. These
associate an image point with a 3D world position (lat, lon, height). If
a full
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane
for some aerial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matt Williams schreef:
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
I absolutely will.
2009/9/22 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
Matt Williams schreef:
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
I absolutely will. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matt Williams schreef:
Hey Stefan. I was wondering when you might turn up.
I have posted bounties on this list for increasing documentation and for
features ;) So I turned up well before you ;)
I guessed you
don't read talk...@osm.org but I
Hi Matt,
This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the
Tilt parameters and so it really struggled.
Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt
parameters, so changed libpano to allow estimate the X,Y and Z camera
position (assuming a
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
I absolutely will. This won't be the last time that OSM hire a plane
Stefan de Konink wrote:
We did; we have a rectifying program, and like I posted before I was
pointed myself to efoto. From there on we can use qgis and mapserver for
final positioning. Come and idle in #osp on oftc ;)
Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image?
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
Hi Matt,
This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the
Tilt parameters and so it really struggled.
Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt
parameters, so changed libpano to allow
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/22 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
If you experiment on this further, it would be really sweet if you did a
tutorial writeup here even if it doesn't work out perfect right now.
I absolutely will.
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
Hi Matt,
This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the
Tilt parameters and so it really struggled.
Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt
parameters, so changed
Pablo d'Angelo schrieb:
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/22 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de:
Hi Matt,
This is the method I had been using before, but obviously without the
Tilt parameters and so it really struggled.
Actually, I played around a little, and I wasn't satisfied with the tilt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pablo d'Angelo schreef:
Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image?
Next to just adding them to Hugin and per photo stitching we don't have it.
But I saw your last email and I wonder:
How did you solve the
] Re: Aerial Photography Stitching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pablo d'Angelo schreef:
Do you have a procedure that works nicely for the large amount of image?
Next to just adding them to Hugin and per photo stitching we don't have it.
But I saw your last email
Hi Matt
2009/9/21 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
Hi guys, I've only recently discovered Hugin so I'm still getting used
to it so bear in mind that there's probably still plenty I'm missing.
I'm a mapper for OpenStreetMap (http://openstreetmap.org), a project
to create a free map of the
2009/9/21 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
First, there are some new tilt options to the panorama tools (Tx, Ty,
Tz and Ts) but doesn't use them yet.
I've had a look through the archives and I see that the options you
mention could indeed be very useful. What version of Hugin are these
Hi Matt,
The general workflow for proper orthorectification (as used by the
professionals) is:
1. Measure some ground control points (GCPs) in the images. These
associate an image point with a 3D world position (lat, lon, height). If
a full bundle adjustment is used, this is not needed for
Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
Hi Matt,
The general workflow for proper orthorectification (as used by the
professionals) is:
1. Measure some ground control points (GCPs) in the images. These
associate an image point with a 3D world position (lat, lon, height). If
a full bundle adjustment is
28 matches
Mail list logo
