On Tue 22-Dec-2009 at 04:56 -0800, Battle wrote:
>
>So Bruno's suggestion to get al list of technical terms together which
>need to be simplified is probably the first task.
>
>I'd propose that we do two things with this list which I would be
>happy to contribute my efforts to. The first is transl
On Dec 21, 10:15 am, Daniel Reetz wrote:
> Do we want
> this part of the interface to describe accurately the underlying
> technology or the relevant part of the Hugin process?
>
I think this is the right question. In the end the users don't care
about the underlying technology, they only want
Hi,
2009/12/21 Roger Howard :
>
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:52:50 -0800 (PST), Bart van Andel
> wrote:
>> On 21 dec, 14:49, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> Detect corresponding points?
>>
>> Nice find!
>
> Feature match?
>
> 100 feature matches found...
> Match features manually?
> Etc...
>
I think "Feat
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:52:50 -0800 (PST), Bart van Andel
wrote:
> On 21 dec, 14:49, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Detect corresponding points?
>
> Nice find!
Feature match?
100 feature matches found...
Match features manually?
Etc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
On Mon 21-Dec-2009 at 17:14 +0100, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
>
> In photogrammetry, what we call control points is called tie
> points. I like that term it more than control points, but
> panotools has used control point, and for the sake of consistency,
> I think we should keep it.
I'm not sure an
bruno.postle wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2:51 pm, Mick Crane wrote:
>> Common point
>
> 'shared features' is another one I like.
In photogrammetry, what we call control points is called tie points. I
like that term it more than control points, but panotools has used
control point, and for the sake of
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Bart van Andel wrote:
> On 21 dec, 14:49, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Detect corresponding points?
I think this suggestion gets to the heart of the matter. Do we want
this part of the interface to describe accurately the underlying
technology or the relevant part of t
On Dec 21, 2:51 pm, Mick Crane wrote:
>
> Common point
'shared features' is another one I like.
--
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://
...
On 21 Dec 2009, at 13:51, Bart van Andel wrote:
> OK, now we have:
> - control point
> - link point
> - connection point
> - anchor point
>
> I couldn't think of many more, except for:
> - key point
> - feature point
>
> Common point
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
On 21 dec, 14:49, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Detect corresponding points?
Nice find!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_F
OK, now we have:
- control point
- link point
- connection point
- anchor point
I couldn't think of many more, except for:
- key point
- feature point
I think the latter two define best what the points actually *are* in
their own image. Both autopano-sift-c and panomatic actually combine
finding
On 20 dec, 16:43, Carl von Einem wrote:
> Thoughts?
Another way to look at it: "autopano-sift-c and friends" detect points
(or regions) which can be used as control points. In that respect,
they are really detectors. Well, in fact they are feature detectors
which generate/define control points.
12 matches
Mail list logo
