[hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure Stack Troubles

2012-04-10 Thread JohnG
... I tried again, and it worked beautifully. Yay! Thank you Carl and Calvin for confirming that this works ( saves me testing it! ). IMHO the zenith and nadir include masks method would be a useful addition to the Hugin documentation and/or Bruno's tutorials for full-sphere panos. ... Is

[hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure Stack Troubles

2012-04-06 Thread zarl
Hi Calvin, On Apr 6, 7:52 am, Calvin McDonald c...@ckmcdonald.com wrote: My apologies John and Carl.  With both of you telling me it should work I decided to try again - even though I was convinced I did as you directed and it didn't work.  I tried again, and it worked beautifully. Great!

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure Stack Troubles

2012-04-05 Thread Calvin McDonald
My apologies John and Carl. With both of you telling me it should work I decided to try again - even though I was convinced I did as you directed and it didn't work. I tried again, and it worked beautifully. Unfortunately, I don't know what I (or Hugin?) did wrong before, but it's working

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure Stack Troubles

2012-04-04 Thread Carl von Einem
JohnG schrieb am 04.04.12 02:40: I'm very disappointed to hear that the zenith stack include mask didn't work ... in theory this should be an extremely elegant workaround for Enblend's inability to read across the poles :-( It should work. If not, I'd check if the stack is properly defined in

[hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure Stack Troubles

2012-04-03 Thread JohnG
Masks are recognised by both Enblend and Enfuse, so if you don't apply your mask to all layers in a stack Enfuse may well produce a set of intermediate images which are difficult to Enblend (and vice versa). Enfuse doesn't really recognise the properly exposed layer of a stack the way you and I