Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 19, 2011 02:30:50 pm dmg wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Yuval Levy wrote: > > hg up -C BRANCH_NAME > > Do not do -C Depends on the intended outcome. With -C you make sure that you are on a clean and fresh checkout of the branch. Paramount for preparing a tarball for

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Jim Watters wrote: On 2011-02-04 10:13 PM, Jim Watters wrote: On 2011-02-04 5:53 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: On Fri 04-Feb-2011 at 16:36 +0100, David Haberthür wrote: Why would PSB (a quick google detour hinted it's PhotoShop) be desired? Is a layered TIFF not something you can import into PhotoS

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Yuval Levy wrote: > >   hg up -C BRANCH_NAME > Do not do -C, use -c. If you use -C it will blindly remove your local changes. -c will warn you if you have uncommitted ones. -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org -- You received this message b

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 2011-02-04 10:13 PM, Jim Watters wrote: On 2011-02-04 5:53 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: On Fri 04-Feb-2011 at 16:36 +0100, David Haberthür wrote: Why would PSB (a quick google detour hinted it's PhotoShop) be desired? Is a layered TIFF not something you can import into PhotoShop? I believe Photo

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 10, 2011 02:32:56 pm Jim Watters wrote: > ... ok I found menu item "Update..." that allows to change between branches > and shows current branch. Every time I switch a branch to I need to do a > Synchronize|Pull? no, just an update. I am sorry I am guiding you blindly through this, I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 2011-02-09 9:02 AM, Yuval Levy wrote: On February 9, 2011 06:47:18 am Jim Watters wrote: Now that panotools is switch to Mercurial. Can someone give a quick overview of Mercurial using TortoiseHg GUI? there is some applicable information at [0] Thank you. The next main differences is that

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 8, 2011 09:12:10 pm Roger Howard wrote: > I've lurked on the list for several years and I've seen > it made abundantly clear that Hugin will be what it is, not what others > want it to be. actually: Hugin is to you what you make it for yourself. Nobody will ever prevent you from goi

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 9, 2011 06:47:18 am Jim Watters wrote: > Now that panotools is switch to Mercurial. > Can someone give a quick overview of Mercurial using TortoiseHg GUI? there is some applicable information at [0] the first main difference, coming from subversion, is that your commits and checkouts

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 9, 2011 05:34:25 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > I think I should chime in with some findings about GEGL and why I > think it's not a good idea to use it. can you record these findings somewhere where they don't get lost (wiki, blueprint, etc.)? thanks for sharing Yuv signature.asc De

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 2011-02-04 10:13 PM, Jim Watters wrote: On Fri 04-Feb-2011 at 16:36 +0100, David Haberthür wrote: Do you have any idea if there are (free/libre) libraries that can write according to Adobes Specifications? http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/photoshop/fileformatashtml/ Looking at the document

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

> On a related topic (large images):  any interest to continue the VIPS project > idea from a few years ago?  maybe using GEGL?  that would complement the new > file format nicely. > > Yuv > I think I should chime in with some findings about GEGL and why I think it's not a good idea to use it. We

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

>> Whether by reverse engineering (is that what you mean with cleanroom?) or >> by >> following the specs to the letter, one important ingredient is lacking: >> motivation. Roger> I'm not even sure it would require reverse engineering, as that work has already been done in ImageMagick,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Yuval Levy wrote: > On February 8, 2011 05:37:06 pm Roger Howard wrote: >> I was under the impression - maybe just guessing - that PSB support was >> added without the official Adobe specification. I know ImageMagick added >> it without - there's no reason IM, Hugin, o

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:58:06PM -0500, Yuval Levy wrote: > On February 8, 2011 05:37:06 pm Roger Howard wrote: > > I was under the impression - maybe just guessing - that PSB support was > > added without the official Adobe specification. I know ImageMagick added > > it without - there's no rea

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 8, 2011 05:37:06 pm Roger Howard wrote: > I was under the impression - maybe just guessing - that PSB support was > added without the official Adobe specification. I know ImageMagick added > it without - there's no reason IM, Hugin, or GIMP can't add support > through a cleanroom implem

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Tue 08-Feb-2011 at 14:01 -0800, Roger Howard wrote: I believe you can build both IM and GIMP with bigtiff support by linking against the libtiff 4.x So it's possible to: Generate huge PSB (from Hugin or whatever) Convert PSB to BigTIFF using IM (IM has had PSB support since March 2010)

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:18 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Tue 08-Feb-2011 at 13:51 -0800, Roger Howard wrote: >> On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: >> > PSB isn't a 'standard', until a few months ago adobe were > actively >> > trying to prevent tools like GIMP from supporting PSB. >> >>

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Ok, thanks Roger for your ideas. The fact is that today, there is no longer this nastiness around implementing PSB support - right? Bruno, I didn't mean to say that PSB is a standard, I meant to say that Photoshop itself is a standard (like it or not) And hey, at least they have a large file f

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Tue 08-Feb-2011 at 13:51 -0800, Roger Howard wrote: On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: > PSB isn't a 'standard', until a few months ago adobe were > actively trying to prevent tools like GIMP from supporting PSB. Has Adobe ever gone after PTGUI? I've never heard that Adobe was

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:27 AM, David Haberthür wrote: > Hey Bruno > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 23:09, Bruno Postle wrote: >> On Mon 07-Feb-2011 at 12:21 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: >>> >>> PSB because that is the only sane way to make large gigapixels. I have >>> made numerous images larger than 4

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Tue 08-Feb-2011 at 10:46 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: >> i'm not aware of any program that can generate a tiff larger than 4gb which >> can then be opened by any other program. > > I understand that if you use a libtiff with 'bigtiff' support

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Tue 08-Feb-2011 at 10:46 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: i'm not aware of any program that can generate a tiff larger than 4gb which can then be opened by any other program. I understand that if you use a libtiff with 'bigtiff' support this just works. not to be snarky, but what is wrong wi

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

i'm not aware of any program that can generate a tiff larger than 4gb which can then be opened by any other program. not to be snarky, but what is wrong with supporting photoshop users? it is a standard. and gimp should have PSB support. honestly, try making large gigapixels. if you're stuck wi

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Hey Bruno On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 23:09, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Mon 07-Feb-2011 at 12:21 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: >> >> PSB because that is the only sane way to make large gigapixels. I have >> made numerous images larger than 4GB and the only real way to edit them is >> if they are PSB form

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

> On a related topic (large images):  any interest to continue the VIPS project > idea from a few years ago?  maybe using GEGL?  that would complement the new > file format nicely. I've added some bits and pieces of the old GSOC-stuff to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/processing-of-v

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Sorry but there is always some kind of problem further down the line. Maybe GIMP will support PSB files eventually. Until then, can we nuzzle satan a bit and just have PSB output which currently requires photoshop to open/edit ? :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On February 7, 2011 05:09:51 pm Bruno Postle wrote: > On Mon 07-Feb-2011 at 12:21 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: > > PSB because that is the only sane way to make large gigapixels. I > > have made numerous images larger than 4GB and the only real way to > > edit them is if they are PSB format. > > T

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Mon 07-Feb-2011 at 12:21 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote: PSB because that is the only sane way to make large gigapixels. I have made numerous images larger than 4GB and the only real way to edit them is if they are PSB format. This is a problem if the only tool that can edit PSB files is Phot

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

PSB because that is the only sane way to make large gigapixels. I have made numerous images larger than 4GB and the only real way to edit them is if they are PSB format. On Friday, February 4, 2011 4:36:10 PM UTC+1, David Haberthür wrote: > > > On 01.02.2011, at 15:59, Jeffrey Martin wrote: > >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 2011-02-04 5:53 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: On Fri 04-Feb-2011 at 16:36 +0100, David Haberthür wrote: Why would PSB (a quick google detour hinted it's PhotoShop) be desired? Is a layered TIFF not something you can import into PhotoShop? I believe Photoshop does not recognize cropped tiff images.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Fri 04-Feb-2011 at 16:36 +0100, David Haberthür wrote: On 01.02.2011, at 15:59, Jeffrey Martin wrote: > i agree about raw input / dng output - it's no business of > hugin. > > what about PSB output? In the end I also agree about the RAW input, it's best left to other software. There wou

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 01.02.2011, at 15:59, Jeffrey Martin wrote: > i agree about raw input / dng output - it's no business of hugin. > > what about PSB output? In the end I also agree about the RAW input, it's best left to other software. Why would PSB (a quick google detour hinted it's PhotoShop) be desired? Is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Hey Thomas. >> Deliberately not copied over are >> -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2008_ideas#Lens_DatabaseIs this still >> relevant? How does Lensfun et al. do? > > Yes, still relevant. > >> -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2010_ideas#Zooming_for_fast_preview >> Still relevant? > > Yes. The fast

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Carl von Einem wrote: Gnome Nomad schrieb am 02.02.11 05:11: (...) I think the most the wiki could benefit from is listing some common raw formats and names of programs that can convert them. I just searched for 'raw' in the panotools wiki -> In the pragraph "E

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Gnome Nomad schrieb am 02.02.11 05:11: (...) I think the most the wiki could benefit from is listing some common raw formats and names of programs that can convert them. I just searched for 'raw' in the panotools wiki -> In the pragraph "External links" follow t

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

kfj wrote: On 1 Feb., 15:35, Rogier Wolff wrote: On the other hand, Hugin might be expanded to allow input-plugins. If we specify that an input-plugin should accept the filename as the first argument and should provide PPM output on its standard out, users can specify say pngtopnm as the inp

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Rogier Wolff wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30:28PM -0800, T. Modes wrote: -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009_idea#hugin_RAW_support Here I don't know. I don't think that hugin should move to support raw formats. I agree. There are plenty of programs around to convert various raw form

[hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On 1 Feb., 15:35, Rogier Wolff wrote: > On the other hand, Hugin might be expanded to allow input-plugins.  If > we specify that an input-plugin should accept the filename as the > first argument and should provide PPM output on its standard out, > users can specify say pngtopnm as the input pl

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Rogier Wolff wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30:28PM -0800, T. Modes wrote: -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009_idea#hugin_RAW_support Here I don't know. I don't think that hugin should move to support raw formats. There is one plausible (but only just) reason. I was looking into super

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

i agree about raw input / dng output - it's no business of hugin. what about PSB output? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30:28PM -0800, T. Modes wrote: > > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009_idea#hugin_RAW_support > > Here I don't know. I don't think that hugin should move to support raw formats. On the input side, users should convert images to the appropriate bit-depth tiff files, a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2011 Announced

Hi Habi, > Deliberately not copied over are > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2008_ideas#Lens_DatabaseIs this still > relevant? How does Lensfun et al. do? Yes, still relevant. > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009_idea#hugin_RAW_support Here I don't know. > -http://wiki.panotools.org/SoC_2009