Hi Yuv,
I find the proposal "3D Extension of Panotools Library" very fascinating. I
feel that making the new model, for incorporating pictures from a shifted
(and other possible ways of transformation) position would be really
interesting.
I wanted to discuss about the scope of this proposal.
Than
On Thu 02-Apr-2009 at 10:10 +0530, sumit sinha wrote:
> I find the proposal "3D Extension of Panotools Library" very
> fascinating. I feel that making the new model, for incorporating
> pictures from a shifted (and other possible ways of
> transformation) position would be really interesting.
On Apr 3, 8:38 am, Bruno Postle wrote:
[snip]
> There are two ways of looking at this:
>
> Mosaics. Photos taken at different locations and angles of the same
> planar surface (such as a mural, row of houses, or a floor),
> stitching them into either a single image or incorporating them into
>
Bruno: "Where do you stop? This is potentially
an enormous project. "
I agree. There's a really big potential here. But to start I think it
would be really cool if hugin could correct for the kind of small
camera movements that are inevitable when shooting panoramas handheld.
--~--~-~--~
On Thu 02-Apr-2009 at 16:17 -0700, allard wrote:
>
>Bruno: "Where do you stop? This is potentially
>an enormous project. "
>
>I agree. There's a really big potential here. But to start I think it
>would be really cool if hugin could correct for the kind of small
>camera movements that are inevita
Hi all,
Actually, my thesis project is about creating a linear panorama from a
series of photos taken along a line. I'm rebuilding the system as
described in an article called "Photographing Long Scenes with Multi-
Viewpoint Panoramas" [1]. Basically, these are the steps which are
performed (a bi
