Hullo Paul,
On Oct 5, 9:03 pm, paul womack wrote:
[snip]
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
> /home/bugbear/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/hugin-2009.2.0-0.1.20090914svn.fc10.x86_64/usr/bin/calibrate_lens
>
> I performed:
>
> find /home/bugbear/rpmbuild -name "*calib*"
> and the only result w
Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Fri 02-Oct-2009 at 16:30 +0100, paul womack wrote:
>> I'm trying to "get" the exciting (well, I'm excited!) new release
>> on my Fedora 10 box.
>>
>> As I understand matters, the "approved" mechanism is to install
>> the tarball, let the rpmbuild process trundle along (for
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb paul womack:
...
> No mention of cmake, except in the context of SVN.
>
> So I either (at this stage) need to make the rpmbuild
> thing work, or change to cmake.
>
> I would welcome advise of either (including advise
> as to which!)
>
>BugBear
The cmake-files
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb Bruno Postle:
> On Fri 02-Oct-2009 at 16:30 +0100, paul womack wrote:
> >I'm trying to "get" the exciting (well, I'm excited!) new release
> >on my Fedora 10 box.
> >
> >As I understand matters, the "approved" mechanism is to install
> >the tarball, let the rpmbui
On Fri 02-Oct-2009 at 16:30 +0100, paul womack wrote:
>
>I'm trying to "get" the exciting (well, I'm excited!) new release
>on my Fedora 10 box.
>
>As I understand matters, the "approved" mechanism is to install
>the tarball, let the rpmbuild process trundle along (for "some" time)
>and then insta
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb paul womack:
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> What I do _not_ understand, why there is proposed to call "make
>>> package_source". Instead I would try this sequence:
>>> svn co ... (as usual)
>> I didn't use svn at all; I downloaded hugin-2009.2.0
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb paul womack:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > What I do _not_ understand, why there is proposed to call "make
> > package_source". Instead I would try this sequence:
> > svn co ... (as usual)
>
> I didn't use svn at all; I downloaded hugin-2009.2.0.tar.gz from
> http://s
Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> What I do _not_ understand, why there is proposed to call "make
> package_source". Instead
> I would try this sequence:
> svn co ... (as usual)
I didn't use svn at all; I downloaded hugin-2009.2.0.tar.gz from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/
I note you
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 schrieb paul womack:
> I'm trying to "get" the exciting (well, I'm excited!) new release
> on my Fedora 10 box.
>
> As I understand matters, the "approved" mechanism is to install
> the tarball, let the rpmbuild process trundle along (for "some" time)
> and then install t
